7066
U. BANIN et al.
55
qualitatively observed in the hole-burning spectra for the se-
ries of samples shown in Fig. 1͑b͒.
280Ϯ40 fs. The temperature dependence is consistent with a
line-broadening mechanism which results from coupling to
low-frequency acoustic modes. This intrinsic mechanism
limits the linewidth in highly confined quantum dots.
Compared to the CdSe nanocrystal system, we find that
the Fr o¨ hlich coupling to LO phonons is smaller in InP. The
TO mode is also coupled to the electronic transition unlike
the more polar CdSe case. The observed and calculated level
structure is found to be more congested in InP primarily
because of the smaller spin-orbit splitting in the bulk. The
low-temperature linewidth for 29-Å InP is smaller than that
observed for similar size CdSe, but the temperature depen-
dence of the broadening is considerably steeper indicating
stronger deformation-potential mediated coupling to acoustic
phonons in InP nanocrystals.
The deformation-potential coupling mechanism predicts a
5
1
/r dependence of the linewidth on size. This suggests that
while in the very small sizes considerable intrinsic broaden-
ing is present, there is a size regime in which the simple
confinement pictures suffice and the spacing of the electronic
transitions greatly exceeds the linewidth. This size regime is
material dependent. In InP nanocrystals with a radius of 50
Å, the predicted intrinsic low-temperature linewidth is 0.002
meV, and even at 300 K the linewidth is predicted to
broaden only to 0.06 meV by this particular mechanism.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
InP nanocrystals in the size range below 50-Å in diameter
exhibit an electronic structure of a band-edge transition
along with close-lying excited states, assigned within a
model of a particle in a spherical box including the effects of
valence-band mixing. The excited transitions, as observed by
ns hole burning, are broadened and congested leading to a
pulse-limited fast decay component in the fs 3PPE measure-
ments. The band-gap transitions have linewidths on the order
of a few meV. Direct 3PPE measurements for 29-Å samples
show that the low-temperature electronic dephasing time is
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. Bob Schoenlein for helpful discussions. We
are grateful to Dr. Al. L. Efros for assistance in the energy-
level calculations. U.B. thanks the Rothschild and Fulbright
foundations for support. G.C. acknowledges support of
NATO. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of
Energy under Contract No. DE-AC0376SF00098.
*
Permanent address: Dipartimento di Fisica del Politecnico, Piazza
L. Da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy.
A. P. Alivisatos, Science 271, 933 ͑1996͒.
L. E. Brus, Appl. Phys. A 53, 465 ͑1991͒.
and J. R. Heath, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 7212 ͑1996͒.
1
1
5
6
H. Geissen, B. Fluegel, G. Mohs, N. Peyghambarian, J. R. Spra-
gue, O. I. Macic, and A. J. Nozik, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 304
͑1996͒.
1
2
3
S. Schmitt-Rink, D. A. B. Miller, and D. S. Chemla, Phys. Rev. B
C. J. Bardeen and C. V. Shank, Chem. Phys. Lett. 203, 535
3
5, 8813 ͑1987͒.
͑
1993͒.
D. J. Norris and M. G. Bawendi, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 5260
1995͒.
D. W. Peck, L. R. Narasimhan, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys.
2, 4125 ͑1990͒.
S. Mukamel, in Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy
Oxford, New York, 1995͒.
4
5
6
7
C. B. Murray, D. J. Norris, and M. G. Bawendi, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 115, 8706 ͑1993͒.
J. E. Bowen Katari, V. L. Colvin, and A. P. Alivisatos, J. Phys.
Chem. 98, 4109 ͑1994͒.
A. P. Alivisatos, A. L. Harris, N. J. Levinos, M. L. Steigerwald,
and L. E. Brus, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4001 ͑1988͒.
M. G. Bawendi, W. L. Wilson, L. Rothberg, P. J. Carrol, T. M.
Jedju, M. L. Steigerwald, and L. E. Brus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65,
17
18
19
͑
9
͑
2
2
0
1
A. M. Weiner, S. De Silvestri, and E. P. Ippen, J. Opt. Soc. Am.
B 2, 645 ͑1985͒.
C. Bardeen, G. Cerullo, and C. V. Shank, in Ultrafast Phenomena
X, edited by P. F. Barbara, W. H. Knox, J. Fujimoto, and W.
Zinth ͑Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996͒, p. 197.
J. J. Shiang, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley,
California, 1995.
N. Bloembergen, in Nonlinear Optics ͑Benjamin, New York,
1965͒.
Y. Wang, A. Suna, J. McHugh, E. F. Hilinski, P. A. Lucas, and R.
D. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 6927 ͑1990͒.
D. S. Kim, J. Shah, T. C. Damen, W. Schafer, F. Jahnke, S.
Schmitt-Rink, and K. Kohler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2725 ͑1992͒.
D. S. Kim, J. Shah, T. C. Damen, W. Schafer, L. N. Pfeiffer, and
K. Kohler, Phys. Rev. B 50, 15 086 ͑1994͒.
M. Kock, J. Feldmann, E. O. Goebel, P. Thomas, J. Shah, and K.
Koehler, Phys. Rev. B 48, 11 480 ͑1993͒.
Al. L. Efros and A. L. Efros, Fiz. Tekh. Poluyprovodn. 16, 1209
͑1982͒ ͓Sov. Phys. Semicond. 16, 772 ͑1982͔͒.
L. E. Brus, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4403 ͑1984͒.
1
623 ͑1990͒.
8
9
R. W. Schoenlein, D. M. Mittleman, J. J. Shiang, A. P. Alivisatos,
and C. V. Shank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1014 ͑1993͒.
D. M. Mittleman, R. W. Scshoenlein, J. J. Shiang, V. L. Colvin,
A. P. Alivisatos, and C. V. Shank, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14 435
2
2
2
2
3
4
͑
1994͒.
1
0
1
T. Takagahara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3577 ͑1993͒.
1
1
1
A. I. Ekimov, F. Hache, M. C. Schanne-Klein, D. Ricard, C.
Flytzanis, I. A. Kudryavtsev, T. V. Yazeva, A. V. Rodina, and
A. L. Efros, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 100 ͑1993͒.
D. J. Norris, A. Sacra, C. B. Murray, and M. G. Bawendi, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 72, 2612 ͑1994͒; D. J. Norris and M. G. Bawendi,
Phys. Rev. B 53, 16 338 ͑1996͒.
O. I. Micic, C. J. Curtis, K. M. Jones, J. R. Sprague, and A. J.
Nozik, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 4966 ͑1994͒; O. I. Micic, J. R. Spra-
gue, C. J. Curtis, K. M. Jones, J. L. Machol, A. J. Nozik, H.
Geissen, B. Fluegel, G. Mobs, and N. Peyghambarian, ibid. 99,
2
3
25
2
2
2
6
7
8
7754 ͑1995͒.
1
4
29
A. A. Guzelian, J. E. B. Katari, A. V. Kadavanich, U. Banin, K.
Hamad, E. Juban, A. P. Alivisatos, R. H. Wolters, C. C. Arnold,
3
0
G. B. Grigoryan, E. M. Kazaryan, Al. L. Efros, and T. V. Yazeva,