5
explain reaction mechanisms. NLEs have been already
first prepared by reacting diphenylphosphinobenzaldehyde
with various mixtures of L- and D-tert-leucine (L/D ratio of
100/0, 90/10, 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, 55/45, 50/50; method A).
The ligands of optical purities between 10 and 80% were
tested two or three times to secure the reproducibility
(see Supporting Information). The results are presented in
Figure 1.
6
observed in Cu-catalyzed 1,4-conjugate additions to enones.
7
Early observations were reported in 1994 by Pfaltz and van
8
Koten with Grignard reagents. In the case of addition of
organozinc nucleophiles, both negative and positive NLEs were
reported. Moderate depletions were observed by Feringa in the
Cu/phosphoramidite-catalyzed addition on cyclohexenone
9
and chalcone, Fu in the Cu/phosphaferroceneÀoxazoline
1
0
catalyzed addition on 4-chlorochalcone, and Ito in the
1
1
Cu/phosphino-phenol-catalyzed addition to chalcone. An
amplification (58% ee was reached with a 40% ee ligand) in
agreement with the Kagan ML model was observed by Hu in
2
the Cu/bidentate phosphiteÀpyridine-catalyzed addition on
1
2
chalcone. In 2004, Alexakis and van Koten observed a posi-
tive NLE in the Cu/aminoarenthiolate-catalyzed addition on
1
3
cyclohexenone (50% ee was obtained with a 36% ee ligand).
Nevertheless, it must be underlined that similar observa-
tion has never been reported to date on the Cu-catalyzed
1
,6-conjugate addition reaction.
Scheme 1. Cu(II)/DiPPAM-Catalyzed 1,6-ACA
Figure 1. NLE in Cu(II)/DiPPAM-catalyzed 1,6-ACA.
a
b
ee was determined on chiral GC using a Betadex column. Average
values from multiple experiments (see supporting information for
details).
A strong positive NLE was observed as, for instance, the
product was obtained in 71% ee when a ligand having a ee
of 40% was used. It was checked first that the preparation
mode of the ligand did not have any influence on the result.
To that aim, (L)-L1 and (D)-L1 ligands were first prepared
separately then mixed in a 60/40 ratio before being used in
the catalysis (method B). In this case, the product was
isolated in a similar ee (45%) to this which was obtained
using method A. To check that the removal of the hexane
We decided to study the relationship between optical
purities of the tert-butyl DiPPAM ligand L1 and the
product, and we report our results here.
The1,6-conjugateadditionwasstudied usingdiethylzinc
and (E)-3-(prop-1-en-yl)cyclohex-2-enone 1 under the ex-
4
perimental conditions reported previously: 5 mol % of
Cu(OTf) and 10 mol % of the ligand were used, and the
2
reactions were run in Me-THF at 0 °C. After acidic quench-
ing, the product being partially reconjugated, the reconjuga-
tion step was completed in the presence of DBU (Scheme 1).
DiPPAM ligands L1 having different optical purities were
from the Et Zn solution before the addition of solvent and
2
reagents did not interfere with the result, an experiment
was run without the removal of hexanes using a 20% ee
ligand. In this case, the reaction was slower, but a similar ee
value was reached (43%). Moreover the evolution of the ee
value in the course of time was monitored in the reaction
using a ligand having an optical purity of 20%: seven
reactions were run simultaneously in the same conditions
but quenched at different times (from 1 h 30 to 24 h), and it
was observed that in all cases the ee’s were somewhat
constant (ranging from 37% to 50%). Besides, it can be
noted that the isolated yields dropped when low ee ligands
were used (10À40%). First, it was observed that the con-
version of the conjugate addition step was lower when a
(7) Zhou, Q.-L.; Pfaltz, A. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 4467–4478.
(8) van Koten, G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1455–1462.
(9) Arnold, L. A.; Imbos, R.; Mandoli, A.; de Vries, A. H. M.; Naasz,
R.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2865–2878.
(10) Shintani, R; Fu, G. C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3699–3702.
(11) Ito, K.; Eno, S.; Saito, B.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
3
981–3985.
(
12) Hu, Y.; Liang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Hu, X. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 2771–2774.
(
13) Arink, A. M.; Braam, T. W.; Keeris, R.; Jastrzebski, J. T. B. H.;
Benhaim, C.; Rosset, S.; Alexakis, A.; van Koten, G. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
959–1962.
1
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 14, 2012
3577