Complex 5. Palladium acetate (0.032 g, 0.14 mmol), racemic 2
¯
(
M
r
1018.87), triclinic, P1, a = 12.4100(3), b = 12.7960(3), c =
◦
(
0.100 g, 0.28 mmol), and NaI (0.042 g, 0.28 mmol) were heated
˚
1
2
3
5.1290(4) A, a = 100.433(1), b = 99.417(1), c = 111.286(1) , Z =
3 −3
◦ ◦
c
◦
in DMSO (4 ml) at 60 C for 16 h, then the temperature was
˚
, V = 2131.48(9) A , D
= 1.586 g cm , 2.91 ≤ 2H ≤ 27.485 .
◦
gradually raised to 120 C over a period of 8 h, after which time
2768 reflections were collected of which 8678 were unique. 8678
the dark red-brown solution had become pale brown. The solution
was filtered to remove Pd black, the solvent removed in vacuo, and
the residue washed with methanol (3 × 5 ml) then extracted with
THF to separate unreacted, insoluble, 2. The crude product (a
mixture of several isomers) was precipitated by the addition of
reflections having I > 2.0r(I) were used for refinement (449
parameters), converging to R = 0.0524 and R = 0.1310.
W
CCDC reference numbers 611607–611609 for 2, 4 and 5,
respectively.
For crystallographic data in CIF format see DOI:
Et
2
O and further recrystallised from THF–Et
(400 MHz; CDCl
.35 (16H, m, aromatic CH), 5.17 (4H, s), 4.67–4.75 (4H, m),
2
O to yield 5 as a
1
0.1039/b611647g
yellow powder. Yield: 0.30 g, 23%. d
H
3
) 7.20–
7
3
Acknowledgements
.66–3.78 (4H, m), 3.54–3.66 (4H, m), 2.86 (4H, d (J = 16 Hz) of
+
poorly resolved t). HRMS (ESI, [M + H] ): m/z = 909.0099 Da
We are extremely grateful to Drs Li Ling Ooi and Andreas Stasch
for the crystal structure determinations, to the EPSRC/Crystal
Faraday and Cardiff University for financial support, and to
Johnson Matthey for a loan of Pd salts.
(
−4.8 ppm from calc.).
X-Ray crystallography
All structures were collected at 150 K on a Bruker/Nonius
Kappa CCD diffractometer using graphite monochromated Mo-
References
˚
Ka radiation (k = 0.71073 A). Structure refinement and final
geometrical calculations were carried out with the SHELX-97
1 (a) D. J. Cardin, M. J. Doyle and M. F. Lappert, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1972, 927; (b) M. F. Lappert, J. Organomet. Chem., 1984,
17
programs. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically;
hydrogen atoms were included in idealised positions and refined
using a riding model. ORTEP plots were produced using the
2
64, 217.
2
J. H. Hill and T. A. Nile, J. Organomet. Chem., 1977, 137, 293.
3 W. A. Herrmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1290.
4 F. K. Zinn, M. S. Viciu and S. P. Nolan, Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem., Sect.
B, 2004, 100, 231.
18
ORTEP-3 for Windows program and show thermal ellipsoids
at the 50% probability level.
5
D. S. McGuinness, N. Saendig, B. F. Yates and K. J. Cavell, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 4029.
(
13bRS,13cRS)-5,6,8,9,13b,13c-Hexahydro-7a-aza-6a-azonia-
6
D. S. McGuinness, B. F. Yates and K. J. Cavell, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
dibenzo[c,g]fluorene tetrafluoroborate (2). Colourless crystals
2
001, 123, 8317.
3
(
0.30 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm ) of 2 (racemic) were grown from a
7 K. J. Cavell and D. S. McGuinness, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248,
6
71.
mixture of ethanol and diethyl ether: C19
¯
H
19BF
4
N
2
(M
r
362.17),
˚
8
9
C. M. Crudden and D. P. Allen, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 2247.
triclinic, P1, a = 7.5518(15), b = 8.1740(16), c = 14.052(3) A, a =
D. Enders, H. Gielen, G. Raabe, J. Runsink and J. H. Teles, Chem. Ber.,
◦
3
˚
1
D
00.08(3), b = 101.81(3), c = 96.24(3) , Z = 2, V = 826.5(3) A ,
1
996, 129, 1483.
10 V. C e´ sar, S. Bellemin-Laponnaz and L. H. Gade, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004,
3, 619.
1 M. C. Elliott, E. Williams and S. T. Howard, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 2002, 201; M. C. Elliott and E. Williams, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2003, 1, 3038; M. C. Elliott, K. M. A. Malik and E. Williams, J. Chem.
Crystallogr., 2004, 34, 371.
2 (a) R. Jackstell, S. Harkal, H. Jiao, A. Spannenberg, C. Borgmann, D.
R o¨ ttger, F. Nierlich, M. Elliott, S. Niven, K. Cavell, O. Navarro, M. S.
Viciu, S. P. Nolan and M. Beller, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 3891; (b) K. J.
Cavell, International Symposium on Relations between Homogeneous
and Heterogeneous Catalysis (ISHHC-XII), Florence, July 2005,
presentation OC15; (c) K. J. Cavell, Singapore International Chemical
Conference (SICC-4), Singapore, December 2005, presentation 81-CA-
A0293.
−
3
◦
◦
c
= 1.455 g cm , 3.02 ≤ 2H ≤ 27.00 . 6741 reflections were
3
collected of which 3588 were unique. 3588 reflections having I >
.0r(I) were used for refinement (235 parameters), converging to
R = 0.0721 and R = 0.1828.
1
2
W
13bRS,13cRS)-6,6,8,8-Tetramethyl-5,6,8,9,13b,13c-hexahydro-
1
7
a-aza-6a-azonia-dibenzo[c,g]fluorene tetrafluoroborate (4).
3
Colourless crystals (0.20 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm ) of 4 were grown
¯
from ethanol: C23
H
27BF
4
N
2
(M
r
418.28), triclinic, P1, a =
˚
8
.0210(16), b = 10.697(2), c = 12.929(3) A, a = 71.95(3),
◦
3
˚
b = 86.98(3), c = 74.82(3) , Z = 2, V = 1017.4(4) A , D =
c
−
3
◦
◦
1
.365 g cm , 3.03 ≤ 2H ≤ 26.99 . 7948 reflections were collected
1
1
3 W. A. Herrmann, D. Baskakov, E. Herdtweck, S. D. Hoffmann, T.
Bunlaksananusorn, F. Rampf and L. Rodefeld, Organometallics, 2006,
25, 2449.
of which 4381 were unique. 4381 reflections having I > 2.0r(I)
were used for refinement (275 parameters), converging to R =
4 F. Guillem, C. L. Winn and A. Alexakis, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
0
.0529 and R
W
= 0.1179.
2
001, 12, 2083.
3
Complex 5. A pale yellow crystal (0.20 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm )
15 P. K. Fraser and S. Woodward, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2747.
1
1
6 L. Boh e´ and M. Kammoun, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 803.
7 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX-97, Programs for crystal structure determina-
tion and refinement, University of G o¨ ttingen, Germany, 1997.
of 5 (containing one molar equivalent of THF and 0.5 molar
equivalents of diethyl ether) was grown by vapour diffusion of di-
ethyl ether into a THF solution of the complex: C44
H
49
I
2
N
4
O1.5Pd
18 L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1997, 30, 565.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Dalton Trans., 2006, 4922–4925 | 4925