T. Sakai et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 (2004) 1929–1932
1931
injection temp. 200 °C), and the enantiomeric excess
determined by HPLC [Chiralcel OB-H, hexane/
i-PrOH ¼ 100:1, flow rate ¼ 0.5 mL/min, detection
254 nm, 17.5 min for (S)-2, 19.0 min for (R)-2]. The
absolute configuration was determined to be (R) by
comparison of the sign of the specific rotation
ln E
2.5
60
30
0 —10 oC
% ee
76
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
64
46
24
{½aꢀ ¼ )6.0 (c 0.5, CH3OH), 54% ee} with that
D
{½aꢀ ¼ +12.2 (c 4, CH3OH), 87% ee, (S)} already re-
D
ported.11 The retention times for (S)- and (R)-2 were
confirmed by using commercially available racemic 2. In
the reaction at 60 °C, the amount of lipase was also in-
creased to shorten the reaction time, owing to the vol-
atility of the solvent.
EtOH
MeOH
2.5
3
3.5
)
4
1/T (×10—3 K—1
Figure 2. Correlation between ln E versus 1/T (Lipase PS on Toyonite,
MeOH or EtOH).
Acknowledgements
3. Conclusion
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scien-
tific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
We have reported the temperature effect on the enantio-
face-selective protonation in the lipase-catalyzed
hydrolysis of prochiral enol ester of ketone, in which
(R)-2-methylcyclohexanone was obtained at best in 77%
ee with 82% conversion at 0 °C. The existence of the
temperature effect is significant for the discussion of the
mechanism and for fine-tuning the enantioselectivity. A
combination of the low-temperature method and opti-
mization of the enzyme is the next subject for improving
further the asymmetric protonation.
References and notes
1. (a) Tomioka, K.; Koga, K. In Asymmetric Synthesis;
Morrison, J. D., Ed.; Academic: New York, 1983; Vol. 2,
pp 201–224; (b) Enders, D. In Asymmetric Synthesis;
Morrison, J. D., Ed.; Academic: New York, 1984; Vol. 3,
pp 275–339.
2. Recent examples: (a) Review: Fehr, C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2566–2587; (b) Eames, J.; Wee-
rasooriya, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 521–523; (c)
Yamashita, Y.; Emura, Y.; Odashima, K.; Koga, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 209–213; Temperature effect in
4. Experimental
4.1. General
ꢀ
a chemical method: (d) Henin, F.; Letinois, S.; Muzart, J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 2037–2044; (e) Asensio,
ꢀ
Silica gel column chromatography was performed using
Fuji Silysia BW-127 ZH (100–270 mesh). Thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck silica
gel 60 F254. Lipase PS-C II and lipase PS were purchased
from Amano Enzyme Inc. Diisopropyl ether was dis-
ꢀ
ꢀ
G.; Gil, J.; Aleman, P.; Medio-Simon, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1359–1362; Review: (f) Eames, J.;
Weerasooriya, N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1–24;
Review: (g) Ishibashi, H.; Ishihara, K.; Yamamoto, H.
Chem. Rec. 2002, 2, 177–188; (h) Ohtsuka, Y.; Ikeno, T.;
Yamada, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 967–970;
1
tilled from sodium before use. H NMR spectra were
ꢁ
ꢁ
(i) Munoz-Muniz, O.; Juaristi, E. Tetrahedron: Lett. 2003,
44, 2023–2026; (j) Futatsugi, K.; Yanagisawa, A.;
Yamamoto, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2003,
566–567; (k) Ishihara, K.; Nakashima, D.; Hiraiwa, Y.;
Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 24–25; (l)
measured at 200 MHz. Enantiomeric excesses were
determined by HPLC analyses detected at 254 nm with a
chiral column (Chiralcel OB-H, Daicel Chemical
Industries). 1-Acetoxy-2-methylcyclohexene 1 was pre-
pared by a reported procedure.3b
ꢀ
Baur, M. A.; Riahi, A.; Henin, F.; Muzart, J. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2755–2761.
3. (a) Ohta, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Tsutsumi, S.; Ihori, T. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 485–486; (b) Matsu-
moto, K.; Tsutsumi, S.; Ihori, T.; Ohta, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 9614–9619; (c) Fujii, I.; Lerner, R. A.;
Janda, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8528–8529; (d)
Matsumoto, K.; Ohta, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
4729–4732; (e) Matsumoto, K.; Oishi, T.; Nakata, T.;
Shibata, T.; Ohta, K. Biocatalysis 1994, 9, 97–104; (f)
Matsumoto, K.; Kitajima, H.; Nakata, T. J. Mol. Catal.
B: Enzym. 1995, 1, 17–21; Accounts: (g) Ohta, H. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1997, 70, 2895–2911; (h) Hirata, T.;
Shimoda, K.; Kawano, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000,
11, 1063–1066; (i) Fantin, G.; Fogagnolo, M.; Guerrini,
A.; Medici, A.; Pedrini, P.; Fontana, S. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2709–2713.
4.2. Typical procedure for lipase PS-C II-catalyzed
asymmetric protonation in the presence of ethanol
A
mixture of 1-acetoxy-2-methylcyclohexene 13b
(100 mg, 0.65 mmol), lipase PS-C II (amount indicated
in Table 1) and 5 mL of diisopropyl ether was placed in
a test tube in a thermo-controlled bath. Ethanol (380 lL,
6.5 mmol) was quickly injected into the mixture through
a syringe. The reaction progress was monitored by TLC
(hexane/ethyl acetate ¼ 4:1). The mixture was quickly
filtered with suction to remove the lipase and the filtrate
concentrated under reduced pressure. The conversion
was analyzed by GC (PEG-3m, oven temp. 120 °C,