J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4317-4318
The Asymmetric Baylis-Hillman Reaction
4317
Linda Joy Brzezinski, Sara Rafel, and James W. Leahy*
Figure 1.
Table 1
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of California
Berkeley, California 94720-1460
ReceiVed January 9, 1997
The controlled construction of carbon-carbon bonds is of
fundamental importance in organic chemistry. Unfortunately,
there are relatively few methods for performing this task with
absolute stereocontrol. We wish to report here an asymmetric
variation of the Baylis-Hillman reaction as a novel method to
realize this objective.
The tertiary amine catalyzed addition of an acrylate to an
aldehyde is widely referred to as the Baylis-Hillman reaction
1
(
Figure 1). This reaction activates an acrylate group to form
a carbon-carbon bond via nucleophilic attack of an aldehyde,
thereby creating a new stereocenter. Selective formation of this
stereocenter would provide a route to optically enriched
R-methylene-â-hydroxy esters, useful building blocks in organic
1
synthesis. These compounds have previously been converted
Scheme 1
to a variety of other products with high stereospecificity,
including aziridines, epoxides, triols, and anti aldol adducts.
2
3
4
5
Numerous attempts have been made to introduce stereoselec-
tivity into the Baylis-Hillman reaction using optically pure
amine catalysts,6 aldehydes,7 and acrylates.8 However, no
reliable, highly enantioselective process has emerged to date.
We have found a system that routinely provides Baylis-Hillman
products in greater than 99% enantiomeric excess in moderate
to excellent yields with a variety of achiral aldehydes. Chiral
auxiliaries have been proven to be a highly effective method
of introducing stereochemistry into a molecule in a recoverable
fashion.9 Particularly useful in this regard has been the
that were essentially optically pure.12 The reaction works best
10
when the aldehyde substrates are unbranched at the R-position,
as evidenced by the results with isobutyraldehyde (2d) and
benzaldehyde (2h). Furthermore, the auxiliary was fortuitously
cleaved under the reaction conditions by incorporation of a
second equivalent of the aldehyde, thereby rendering 1 as a
camphor-derived Oppolzer’s sultam. It is readily available
as either antipode and typically leads to excellent transfer of
1
1
chirality.
In practice, Oppolzer’s sultam was found to be an ideal
auxiliary in the Baylis-Hillman reaction (Table 1). The reaction
proceeded smoothly with a variety of aldehydes to yield products
1
3
renewable source of chirality in this case.
The 1,3-dioxan-4-ones produced in this manner were easily
converted into R-methylene-â-hydroxy esters (Scheme 1). As
mentioned above, this is a versatile template for further
manipulation. For example, products such as 3 were directly
converted into the corresponding anti aldol adducts (4) via
(
1) For recent reviews, see: (a) Basavaiah, D.; Rao, P. D.; Hyma, R. S.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8001. (b) Drewes, S. E.; Roos, G. H. P. Tetrahedron
988, 44, 4653.
2) Atkinson, R. S.; Fawcett, J.; Russel, D. R.; Williams, P. J. J. Chem.
1
(
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2031. For an excellent review on directed
reactions, see: Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. ReV. 1993,
5,14
directed reduction of the olefin.
Given the difficulty typically
9
3, 1307.
5
(
3) Bailey, M.; Mark o´ , I. E.; Ollis, W. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
associated with direct generation of this stereochemical array,1
2
687.
(
4) Mark o´ , I. E.; Giles, P. R.; Janousek, Z.; Hindley, N. J.; Declercq,
(12) A representative procedure for this transformation is as follows: A
solution of acrylate 111 (500 mg, 1.85 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was cooled
to 0 °C, and propionaldehyde (2.0 mL, 27 mmol) was added followed by
DABCO (20.7 mg, 0.19 mmol). The solution was stirred at 0 °C for 12 h
and then concentrated under reduced pressure without heat. The residue
was purified by flash column chromatography to provide 2b (310.3 mg,
98%) as a clear oil.
(13) While all auxiliaries can theoretically be reused/regenerated, they
are often carried through several synthetic steps, thereby reducing the overall
efficiency of this asymmetric induction. In this case, however, the auxiliary
is automatically removed under the reaction conditions, regenerating the
sultam for subsequent use without additional work. Typically, 90% of the
theoretical amount of the sultam can be recovered from the reaction by
further elution of the flash column.
(14) Generation of the anti aldol adducts via a directed reduction served
the additional purpose of allowing us to confirm the stereochemical outcome
of the Baylis-Hillman reactions by comparison with known scalemic
products. These compounds (such as 4) have been previously reported in
enantiomerically pure fashion (Meyers, A. I.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1981, 103, 4278).
(15) For useful reviews of the aldol reaction, see: (a) Heathcock, C. H.
In Asymmetric Synthesis; Morrison, J. D., Ed.; Academic: New York, 1984;
Vol. 3, pp 112-212. (b) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, J. V.; Taber, T. R. Top.
Stereochem. 1982, 13, 1. (c) Heathcock, C. H. In ComprehensiVe Organic
Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol.
2, pp 133-238.
J.-P.; Tinant, B.; Feneau-Dupont, J.; Svendsen, J. S. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-
Bas 1995, 114, 239.
(
(
5) Brown, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 190.
6) Oishi, T.; Oguri, H.; Hirama, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6,
1
2
2
241.
(
7) Drewes, S. E.; Khan, A. A.: Rowland, K. Synth. Commun. 1993,
3, 183.
(
8) (a) Drewes, S. E.; Emslie, N. D.; Khan, A. A. Synth. Commun. 1993,
3, 1215. (b) Basavaiah, D.; Gowriswari, V. V. L.; Sarma, P. K. S.; Rao,
P. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 1621. (c) Gilbert, A.; Heritage, T. W.;
Isaacs, N. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 969. (d) Khan, A. A.;
Emslie, N. D.; Drewes, S. E.; Field, J. S.; Ramesar, N. Chem. Ber. 1993,
1
26, 1477. (e) Drewes, S. E.; Emslie, N. D.; Karodia, N.; Khan, A. A.
Chem. Ber. 1990, 123, 1447. (f) Jensen, K. N.; Roos, G. H. P. S. Afr. J.
Chem. 1992, 45, 112.
(
9) See: Ager D. J.; Prakash, I.; Schaad, D. R. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96,
8
35 and references cited within.
(
10) Several reviews have appeared, including the following: (a)
Oppolzer, W. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1241. (b) Kim, B. H.; Curran,
D. P. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 293. (c) Oppolzer, W. Tetrahedron 1987, 43,
1
969. (d) Oppolzer, W. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 39.
(
11) (a) Weismiller, M. C.; Towson, J. C.; Davis, F. A. Org. Synth. 1990,
6
9, 154. (b) Towson, J. C.; Weismiller, M. C.; Lal, G. S.; Sheppard, A. C.;
Davis, F. A. Org. Synth. 1990, 69, 158. (c) Ho, G. J.; Mathre, D. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 2271.
S0002-7863(97)00079-6 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society