168
J. Zhang et al. / Phytochemistry 108 (2014) 157–170
4.4. Extraction and isolation
(4.0 mg). Occurrence of three phenolic compounds, 26, 27, and
28, which have been detected in the EtOAc-soluble fraction as
described above, seems likely in the BuOH-soluble fraction as well
– although their occurrence in this fraction was not confirmed in
this study.
Whole nuts were oven-dried at 60 °C over 72 h and decorticat-
ed. Kernels were crushed into powder first. The pulverized sample
was weighed (3705 g), and extracted with hexane (under condi-
tions of reflux, 3 h, 3ꢁ) which gave an extract (1737 g) (Akihisa
et al., 2010c). The defatted residue was then extracted with MeOH
(under conditions of reflux, 3 h, 3ꢁ) to yield a MeOH extract
(450 g) which was suspended in H2O, and partitioned successively
with EtOAc and BuOH to yield EtOAc- (69 g), BuOH- (134 g), and
H2O- (191 g) soluble fractions sequentially.
EtOAc-soluble fraction. A portion of the EtOAc fraction (60.0 g)
was subjected to SiO2 CC (800 g). Step gradient elution was
conducted with hexane–EtOAc (1:0 ? 0:1) and EtOAc–MeOH
(1:0 ? 7:3) to give 14 fractions, A1–A14. Fraction A9 (200 mg),
from the EtOAc eluate, was crystallized from MeOH to yield a
crystalline material (45 mg) which was then acetylated in acetic
anhydride/pyridine. HPLC (system III) of the resulting acetate
yielded compounds 18a (the tetraacetate derivative of 18;
1.7 mg, tR 17.0 min) and 17a (the tetraacetate derivative of 17;
2.0 mg, tR 24.0 min). A portion (403 mg) of the fraction A10
(2.26 g), from the EtOAc eluate , was subjected to HPLC (system
VI) giving compounds 26 (7.2 mg, tR 33.0 min) and 27 (6.6 mg, tR
36.0 min). A portion (650 mg) of the fraction A11 (6.1 g), from
the EtOAc–MeOH (19:1) eluate was passed through a SiO2 CC
[20 g; hexane–EtOAc (7:3 ? 0:1)] to give a fraction (100 mg) from
which was obtained compound 23 (61.9 mg) by crystallization
from MeOH.
H2O-soluble fraction. A portion (90 g) of the H2O-soluble fraction
was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 CC (150 g), eluted with
MeOH–H2O (0:1 ? 1:1) which yielded seven fractions, H1–H7.
The fractions H2 (2.1 g) and H3 (53.9 g), both from the eluates of
H2O, were crystallized from MeOH–H2O (1:1) yielding 30 (1.6 g)
and 29 (1.4 g), respectively. Fraction H4 (20.4 g), from the eluate
of H2O, was subjected to ODS CC (96 g); {MeOH–H2O
(0:1 ? 1:1)] to yield eight fractions, H4–1–H4–8. Fraction H4–7
(724 mg), upon further silica gelCC [25 g; CHCl3–MeOH
(1:0 ? 13:7)], gave a fraction (105 mg) from which were isolated
compounds 5 (16.2 mg, tR 36.0 min) and 4 (20.0 mg, tR 48.0 min)
by HPLC (system II).
4.4.1. Paradoxoside A (1)
White amorphous powder from MeOH, mp 225–228 °C; aD25
ꢀ38.8 (c 0.41, EtOH); UV (EtOH) kmax nm: 264, 394; IR (KBr): mmax
cmꢀ1: 3436 (OH), 2930, 1632 (C@O), 1384, 1073, 1040; For 1H
NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data, see Table 3; HRESIMS m/z:
997.4599 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C47H74O21Na, 997.4615); HRESIMS2
m/z: 821.4281 [(M+Na)
–
GlcA]+ (calcd for C41H66O15Na,
821.4299), 719.3605 [(M+Na) – Ara – Rha]+ (calcd for C36H56O13Na,
719.3618), 543.3285 [(M+Na) – Ara – Rha – GlcA]+ (calcd for
C
30H48O7Na, 543.3297), 499.3384 [(M+Na) – Ara – Rha – GlcA –
BuOH-soluble fraction. The BuOH-soluble fraction (130 g) was
subjected to CC [Diaion HP-20 (1000 g); step-gradient elution with
MeOH–H2O (0:1 ? 1:0)] to give nine fractions, B1–B9. Fraction B2
(29.6 g), from the H2O eluate, was crystallized from MeOH–H2O
(1:1) to yield compound 28 (3.9 g). Fraction B3 (4.6 g), from the
H2O eluate, was passed through an ODS CC [120 g; MeOH–H2O
(0:1 ? 7:3)] to afford eight fractions, B3–1–B3–8. Crystallization
of fraction B3–2 (1.7 g) from MeOH yielded compound 21
(137.6 mg). Fraction B3–7 (140 mg) was subjected to silica gel col-
umn chromatography, CC [10 g; CHCl3–MeOH (19:1 ? 0:1)] to give
a fraction (10 mg) from which were isolated compounds 24
(1.3 mg, tR 11.0 min) and 25 (3.9 mg, tR 12.0 min) by HPLC (system
V). Fraction B4 (4.8 g), from the MeOH–H2O (1:9) eluate, was
applied to a SiO2 column [150 g; CHCl3–MeOH (1:0 ? 7:3)] to yield
nine fractions, B4–1–B4–9. Fraction B4–5 (424 mg), upon CC on an
ODS column [MeOH–H2O (0:1 ? 3:17)], yielded a fraction (36 mg)
from which was obtained compound 22 (3.0 mg, tR 15.0 min) and a
fraction (5.0 mg, tR 17.0 min) by HPLC (system VII). Further HPLC
(system VIII) of the latter fraction yielded compounds 20 (0.8 mg,
tR 57.0 min) and 19 (1.4 mg, tR 58.5 min). A portion (26.0 g) of frac-
tion B7 (27.1 g), from theMeOH–H2O (7:3) eluate, was subjected to
ODS CC [700 g; MeOH–H2O (0:1 ? 1:0)] to afford nine fractions,
B7–1–B7–9. Further silica gel CC [100 g; CHCl3–MeOH
(1:0 ? 13:7)] of fraction B7–5 (3.4 g) yielded nine fractions, B7–
5a–B7–5i. HPLC (system I) of fraction B7–5 h (431 mg) gave com-
pounds 1 (12.5 mg, tR 122.0 min), 2 (14.9 mg, tR 130.0 min), and
3 (17.1 mg, tR 140.0 min). Fraction B8 (20.0 g), from the MeOH–
H2O (9:1) eluate was subjected to ODS CC [200 g; MeOH–H2O
(0:1 ? 1:0) to afford six fractions, B8–1–B8–6. Silica gel CC [CHCl3–
MeOH (1:0 ? 0:1)] of a portion (1.4 g) of the fraction B8–4 (8.8 g)
gave eight fractions, B8–4a–B8–4 h. HPLC (system IV) of fraction
B8–4b (50 mg) yielded compounds 12 (18.6 mg, tR 41.0 min) and
14 (4.0 mg, tR 43.9 min). Fraction B8–4f (155 mg), upon repeated
silica gel CC [CHCl3–MeOH (1:0 ? 1:1)], eventually afforded com-
pounds 6 (1.2 mg), 7 (1.0 mg), 8 (25.0 mg), 9 (35.5 mg), 10
(12.3 mg), and 11 (24.7 mg). An EtOAc-soluble portion (26 mg) of
fraction B8–5 (766 mg) was passed through a silica gel column
[hexane–EtOAc (1:0 ? 3:2)] which afforded compound 16
CO2]+ (calcd for C29H48NaO5, 499.3399).
4.4.2. Paradoxoside B (2)
White amorphous powder from MeOH, mp 217–220 °C; aD25
ꢀ35.3 (c 0.35, EtOH); UV (EtOH) kmax nm: 264, 441; IR (KBr): mmax
cmꢀ1: 3436 (OH), 2930, 1638 (C@O), 1385, 1074, 1040; For 1H
NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data, see Table 3; HRESIMS m/z:
1129.5011 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C52H82O25Na, 1129.5037); HRESIMS2
m/z: 953.4702 [(M+Na) – GlcA]+ (calcd for C46H74O19Na, 953.4721),
719.3598 [(M+Na) – Xyl – Rha – Ara]+ (calcd for C36H56O13Na,
719.3618), 543.3272 [(M+Na) – Xyl – Rha – Ara – GlcA]+ (calcd
for C30H48O7Na, 543.3297).
4.4.3. Paradoxoside C (8)
White amorphous powder from MeOH, mp 235–238 °C; aD25
+13.5 (c 1.15, EtOH); UV (EtOH) kmax nm: 245, 250, 256; IR (KBr):
mmax cmꢀ1: 3436 (OH), 2930, 1638 (C@O), 1385, 1073, 1040; For
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data, see Table 4; HRESIMS
m/z: 695.3998 [M+H]+ (calcd for C37H59O12, 695.4006); HRESIMS2
m/z: 469.3309 [(M+H) – MeGlcA – 2H2O]+ (calcd for C30H45O4,
469.3318).
4.4.4. Paradoxoside D (9)
White amorphous powder from MeOH, mp 241–244 °C; aD25
+20.0 (c 0.87, EtOH); UV (EtOH) kmax nm: 244, 250, 255; IR (KBr):
mmax cmꢀ1: 3410 (OH), 2930, 1700 (C@O), 1384, 1070, 1037; For
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data, see Table 4; HRESIMS
m/z: 851.4427 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C42H68O16Na, 851.4405); HRE-
SIMS2 m/z: 689.3777 [(M+Na) – Glc]+ (calcd for C36H58O11Na,
689.3876), 645.3912 [(M+Na) – Glc – CO2]+ (calcd for C35H58O9Na,
645.3978).
4.4.5. Paradoxoside E (14)
White amorphous powder from MeOH, mp 237–240 °C; aD25
+15.5 (c 0.20, EtOH); UV (EtOH) kmax nm: 272; IR (KBr): mmax
cmꢀ1: 3435 (OH), 2930, 1689 (C@O), 1385, 1070, 1037; For 1H
NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopic data, see Table 4; HRESIMS m/z:
677.3892 [M+H]+ (calcd for C37H57O11, 677.3901); HRESIMS2 m/z: