C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
responsible for the conduction. Fe-based superconductors so far
12 (Ln ) La, Y)6
,7,13
in the Skutterudite family
discovered, LnFe
4
P
2+
and the present LaOFeP, commonly contain Fe ions coordinated
by P anions. However, there are two major differences in the crystal
4
structure between them: (1) LnFe P12 has a three-dimensional
structure, while LaOFeP has a two-dimensional layered structure;
2) the coordination around Fe2 is octahedral for LnFe
+
(
4
P12 but
tetrahedral for LaOFeP. Similar to the layered copper-based oxide
high T superconductors, the aliovalent ion doping to LaOFeP
Figure 2. Electrical resistivity (F) versus temperature (T) for pure and
F-doped LaOFeP.
c
caused the significant difference in the superconducting transition
temperature. LaOFeP has a layered structure and contains a
transition metal ion different from Cu and, therefore, constitutes a
new alternative material system to the layered copper-based oxides.
However, there is a marked difference in the coordination
structure in LaOFeP compared with the layered copper-based
2+
superconductors reported so far; that is, a Cu occupies a planar
2
+
4
-fold square site while Fe in LaOFeP occupies a tetrahedral
3-
site coordinated with four P ions, and the tetrahedrons are linked
with each other by edge-sharing to form the (Fe2
consequence, the electrons at the Fermi level occupy Cu 3dx2-y
orbitals in the layered copper-based superconductors, while either
+ 3-
P
) layer. As a
2
+
2
2+
Fe 3dxy or 3dyz/3dzx orbitals form the Fermi level for LaOFeP.
Therefore, we like to note that LaOFeP has an importance for
superconductivity physics and material exploration: the finding of
the iron-based new superconductor with a different type of a layered
structure will provide an opportunity for studying the mechanism
c
of high T superconductivity in layered crystals. It would be
informative that electronic transport at 2 K in LaOMP (M: +2
charge state transition metal cation) is drastically changed by
5
7
varying M from Mn (3d ) to Co (3d ): semiconductor for Mn,
14
superconductor for Fe, and metal for Co were observed. A variety
of derivatives can be synthesized by replacing the La, M, and/or P
sites, which allows for the systematic study on superconductivity.
Acknowledgment. Y.K. is indebted to Dr. H. Okabe (Aoyama
Gakuin University) and Dr. H. Kito (AIST) for their helpful advice.
Supporting Information Available: Crystal structure data of
LaOFeP at room temperature. This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Figure 3. Superconducting properties of pure and F-doped LaOFeP. (a)
Electrical resistivity (F) versus temperature (T) for pure LaOFeP at various
magnetic fields (H). (b) F versus T for F-doped LaOFeP in comparison
with pure LaOFeP. (c) Magnetic susceptibility (ø) versus T for pure and
F-doped LaOFeP. The dashed line indicates the ø value of the perfect
References
-
2
diamagnetism (-1.32 × 10 emu/g). (d) Magnetization (M) versus H for
(
(
(
1) Bednorz, J. G.; Muller, K. A. Z. Phys. 1986, B64, 189.
2) Patrick, A. L.; Nagaosa, N.; Wen, X. G. ReV. Mod. Phys. 2006, 78, 17.
3) Maeno, Y.; Hashimoto, H.; Yoshida, K.; Nishizaki, S.; Fujita, T.; Bednorz,
J. G.; Lichtenberg, F. Nature 1994, 372, 532.
pure LaOFeP. Inset shows the expanded M-T curve near Hc1.
(
×
ø) measured in zero-field cooling processes (Figure 3c) reach -2.4
10 and -1.2 × 10 emu/g at 2.3 K for pure and F-doped
(
(
4) Hiroi, Z.; Yonezawa, S.; Muraoka, Y. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2004, 73, 1651.
5) Takada, K.; Sakurai, H.; Takayama-Muromachi, E.; Izumi, F.; Dilanian,
R. A.; Sasaki, T. Nature 2003, 422, 53.
-
3
-2
LaOFeP, respectively. These values correspond to the volume
fraction of the superconductivity phase of 18 and 91% (estimated
from the ø value of the perfect diamagnetism). These observations,
zero resistivity and perfect diamagnetism, verify the occurrence of
the superconducting transition in LaOFeP at ∼4 K. Figure 3d shows
a magnetization (M-H) curve for pure LaOFeP at ∼2 K. This M-H
curve shows a typical profile for type-two superconductor-like
layered copper-based oxides, and the lower superconducting critical
magnetic field (Hc1) is observed at around 17 Oe and the upper
superconducting critical magnetic field (Hc2) at >1000 Oe (deduced
from Figure 3a). The Seebeck coefficients of all the samples were
negative in the normal state, indicating the electron carriers are
(
(
6) Meisner, G. P. Phys. B and C 1981, 108, 763.
7) Shirotani, I.; Shimaya, Y.; Kihou, K.; Sekine, C.; Takeda, N.; Ishikawa,
M.; Yagi, T. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2003, 15, S2201.
8) Zimmer, B. I.; Jeitschko, W.; Albering, J. H.; Glaum, R.; Reehuis, M. J.
Alloys Compd. 1995, 229, 238.
(
(9) Tokura, Y.; Takagi, H.; Uchida, S. Nature 1989, 337, 345.
10) Ueda, K.; Hiramatsu, H.; Ohta, H.; Hirano, H.; Kamiya, T.; Hosono, H.
Phys. ReV. B 2004, 69, 155305.
(
(
11) Hiramatsu, H.; Ueda K.; Ohta, H.; Hirano, M.; Kamiya, T.; Hosono, H.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 1048.
(
12) Izumi, F.; Ikeda, T. Mater. Sci. Forum 2000, 321-324, 198.
(
13) Grosvenor, A. P.; Cavell, R. G.; Mar, A. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1650.
(14) Kawamura, R.; Yanagi, H.; Kamiya, T.; Hirano, M.; Hosono, H.
Unpublished results.
JA063355C
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 128, NO. 31, 2006 10013