P. Wei, et al.
MolecularCatalysis488(2020)110903
reaction was initiated by adding the hydrophobic phase containing 200
mM 2-HAP. Aliquots (2 × 20 μL) were taken at specified time intervals
from the biphasic system. The sample from the buffer phase was diluted
by adding the purified water before filtering with the 0.22 μm filter
membrane, whereas the sample from the hydrophobic phase was di-
luted using acetonitrile or ethyl acetate for HPLC analysis. The pH value
of the buffer system was adjusted by batch-feeding the NaHCO3
powder.
Table 2
Enzymatic activity of recombinant BL21 (DE3).
Number
Strain
AcCR activity
(U/g-dw)
A
B
BL21(DE3)
(pETDuet-gst-accr-gdh)
BL21(DE3)
26.5 0.7
420.9 4.8
(pETDuet-gst-mut-accr-gdh)
Condition: 2 mL citrate phosphate buffer (100−200 mM, pH 6.5) containing 50
mM 2-HAP, 50 mM glucose, 10 mg-dcw/mL cells, 30 °C,180 rpm.
Biocatalytic reduction of 2-HAP on the preparative scale
The biocatalytic reduction of 2-HAP on preparative scale with
whole-cell BL21(DE3)(pETDuet-gst-mut-accr-gdh) was conducted by
adding 1.5 g dry-cell of BL21(DE3)(pETDuet-gst-mut-accr-gdh) (15 mg-
dcw/mL) and 675 mM glucose (675 mM, stage addition) in 50 mL
buffer phase as well as 450 mM 2-HAP to 50 mL IL phase, followed by
the execution of the reaction at 200 rpm and 35 °C. Subsequently, the
samples were analyzed by HPLC. The pH value of buffer system was
adjusted by batch-feeding the NaHCO3 powder.
respectively. It indicated that the substrate coupling for the coenzyme
regeneration with isopropanol did not provide NADH fast enough for
the reduction process. The catalytic efficiency based on the enzyme-
coupled coenzyme regeneration overmatched that of the substrate
coupling method. The initial reaction rate was 3.0 mM/min, which was
almost 2 times higher than that of the coenzyme regenerated by iso-
propanol, along with an excellent yield (90.7 %). Therefore, the coex-
pressed strain harboring mut-AcCR and GDH gene had higher catalytic
efficiency, which was chosen to be used to the follow-up study.
The catalytic activity of the recombinant E. coli harboring wild-type
AcCR and mut-AcCR was analyzed for the reduction of 2-HAP. As
shown in Table 2, the catalytic activity of strain A was only 26.5 0.7
U/g-dcw, however the stain B exhibited an activity of 420.9 4.8 U/g-
dcw, which was 15.9 times as compared to the wild-type one.
HPLC analysis
The substrate and product concentration were analyzed by HPLC
(Agilent 1260 Series) with UV detection at 245 nm and 215 nm using
C18 column (Waters, XBridge™ C18, 5 μm, 4.6 φ × 250 mm). The
mobile phase was water/acetonitrile (3/2, v/v, 0.1 % trifluoroacetic
acid in water phase) and its flow rate was 0.5 mL/min at a column
temperature of 35 °C. The retention durations for 2-HAP and PED were
7.80 and 6.24 min, respectively.
Effect of the critical variables on the reduction of 2-HAP to (S)-PED with
BL21(DE3)(pETDuet-gst-mut-accr-gdh) cells in the buffer system
The e.e. value of (S)-PED was analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1100
Series) with UV detection at 215 nm using OB-H column (Daicel, 4.6
mm × 150 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase was the mixture of 2-propanol
and n-hexane (1/9, v/v) and its flow rate was 0.7 mL/min at a column
temperature of 35 °C. The retention time for (R)-PED and (S)-PED was
8.51 and 10.21 min, respectively.
To investigate the asymmetric bioreduction of 2-HAP in detail and
to achieve an improvement in the initial reaction rate and yield, a
systematic study about the effect of the important variables was made.
The buffer pH plays a vital role in the biocatalytic reduction process.
The buffer pH has an effect on the activity and selectivity of the bio-
catalyst, along with coenzyme regeneration, which have an inverse on
the reduction rate [34]. Therefore, an optimum pH range needed for the
reduction process. As presented in Fig. 1a, as the buffer pH increased
from 5.0 to 6.0–6.5, both the reaction rate and yield were observed to
enhance. As the buffer pH reached 7.0, both the initial reaction rate and
yield were noted to drop. There was an insignificant change in the
product e.e. on changing the buffer pH. Obviously, the optimal buffer
pH for the reduction of 2-HAP lied in the range 6.0−6.5. At the pH
range, the initial reaction rate was 2.97 mM/min with a yield of about
90 %.
The coenzyme regeneration relies on the oxidation of glucose, cat-
alyzed by GDH, which can couple with the reduction reaction catalyzed
by the carbonyl reductase. The oxidation process produced D-Gluconic
acid, which can bring down the buffer pH of the reaction system. As
shown in Fig. 1b, the buffer pH exhibited a significant drop accom-
panied by an increase in the D-Gluconic acid concentration during the
reaction progress. Owing to the simultaneous production of D-Gluconic
acid, the buffer pH decreased to ∼ 4.5 after a reaction duration of 4 h.
As shown in Fig. 1a, the buffer pH influenced the initial reaction rate
and yield. The buffer pH was controlled by batch-feeding of the alka-
lescent carbonate (NaHCO3) to the system. The result was remarkable
as the maximum product yield reached 94.1 % after feeding NaHCO3 to
The initial reaction rate, yield and e.e. value of these reactions were
calculated as described in our previous study [27].
The gluconic acid concentration was analyzed indirectly by de-
tecting sodium gluconate, as reported previously (as the sodium glu-
conate concentration was equal to that of gluconic acid) [33]. NaHCO3
was added to the reaction solution until the pH of the mixture was
about 10. The sodium gluconate concentration was analyzed using the
XDB-C18 column (Agilent, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 mm) by HPLC. The
mobile phase was the mixture of water, methanol and 1.0 % H3PO4
solution (45/ 5/ 50, v/v/v), and its flow rate was 0.6 mL/min. The
retention duration of sodium gluconate was 5.7 min.
Results and discussion
Effect of coenzyme recycling on the asymmetric reaction of 2-HAP catalyzed
by recombinant BL21(DE3)
The coenzyme recycling is an important influencing factor for the
asymmetric reduction catalyzed by the whole-cell. As shown in Table 1,
different coenzyme regenerations were investigated, and the initial
reaction rate and yield were observed to be 1.6 mM/min and 62.6 %,
Table 1
Effect of coenzyme recycling on the asymmtric reaction of 2-HAP catalyzed by recombinant BL21(DE3).
Cosubstrate
(200 mmol/L)
Strain
Initial reaction rate
Yield
(%)
e.e
(%)
Config-uration
(mmol L−1 min−1
)
Isopropanol
Glucose
BL21(DE3) (pETDuet-gst-mut-accr)
BL21(DE3) (pETDuet-gst-mut-accr-gdh)
1.6
3.0
62.6
90.7
> 99
> 99
S
S
Reaction condition: 2 mL citrate phosphate buffer (100−200 mM, pH 6.5) containing 100 mM 2-HAP, 200 mM glucose, 10 mg-dcw/mL cells, 35 °C, 200 rpm.
3