8426 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 106, No. 36, 2002
Coombe et al.
249 and 193 nm. The channel leading to singlet photofragments
(eq 1) is clearly open at 193 nm, with a high quantum yield for
the production of NCl(a1∆). Because emission from excited
Cl2(3Π) states was not observed for either 193 or 249 nm
photolysis, it would appear that dissociation of NCl3 to triplet
fragments (eq 3) is not open at these wavelengths. As noted
above, emission from excited Cl2 is readily observed when the
NCl3 auto-decomposition flame is ignited by throttling the pump.
It is interesting to note that emission from excited NCl(a1∆,
bΣ+) is not observed in the auto-decomposition flame, and
indeed emission from excited I(52P1/2) produced by the photo-
dissociation of CH2I2/NCl3/Ar mixtures at 193 nm is quenched
when the auto-decomposition flame is ignited. These observa-
tions are consistent with the auto-decomposition mechanism
proposed by Rubtsov,5 in which Cl atoms are among the
principal products. These atoms are efficient quenchers16,17 of
both NCl(a1∆) and I(52P1/2).
0.8), then NCl(a1∆) self-quenching, with a rate constant19 of
7.2 × 10-12 cm3s-1, would account for another 290 s-1. Hence
the total quenching rate should be about 350 s-1, in very good
agreement with the observed result. For the conditions of Figure
5, this self-quenching process should be dominant in the removal
of excited NCl and the observed decays should in fact be second
order.
The rapid loss of excited I(52P1/2) from the system, exhibited
by the rise of the signals in Figure 5, is more difficult to account
for. The most likely quencher would appear to be the residual
NCl3 in the system. To account for the observed rates, I(52P1/2
)
quenching by NCl3 would have to have a rate constant of
roughly 3 × 10-11 cm3s-1. This value is similar to that reported
by Ray and Coombe7 for I(52P1/2) quenching by ClN3. Current
experiments in our laboratory are directed toward exploring the
rates of energy transfer processes in the I(52P1/2)/NCl(a1∆)/NCl3
system.
While the present data offer a much extended spectrum of
the banded emission produced by photodissociation of NCl3 at
249 nm (Figure 2), few conclusions can be drawn beyond those
reported by Gilbert and co-workers.6 The exponential decay
times for the new bands observed between 750 and 1400 nm
appear to be short, in accord with those expected for excited
states of NCl2. The bands observed by Gilbert et al.6 at shorter
wavelengths had longer lifetimes and were thought to correspond
to excited states of the parent NCl3. Gilbert and Smith18 have
shown that the near UV broadband photolysis of NCl3 trapped
in a low-temperature Ar matrix generates NCl and Cl2. These
authors speculate, though, that the initial photofragments are
NCl2 and Cl and that the NCl arises from either further
photolysis or reaction of the NCl2 in the matrix cage.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the U.S.
Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant No. F49620-
00-1-0062.
References and Notes
(1) Davy, H. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 1813, 103, 1.
(2) Clark, T. C.; Clyne, M. A. A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1969, 65, 2994.
(3) Exton, D. B.; Gilbert, J. V.; Coombe, R. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 2692.
(4) See for example Janda, J. DeVelopments in Inorganic Nitrogen
Chemistry; Colburn, C. B., Ed, Elsevier: New York, 1973, ch. 3.
(5) Rubtsov, N. M. MendeleeV Comm. 1998, 173.
(6) Gilbert, J. V.; Wu, X. L.; Stedman, D. H.; Coombe, R. D. J. Phys.
Chem. 1987, 91, 4265.
(7) Ray, A. J.; Coombe, R. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 3475.
(8) Henshaw, T. L.; Herrera, S. D.; Schlie, L. A. J. Phys. Chem. A
1998, 102, 6239.
(9) Ray, A. J.; Coombe, R. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 1995, 99, 7849.
(10) Henshaw, T. L.; Manke, G. C.; Madden, T. J.; Berman, M. R.;
Hager, G. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 325, 537.
(11) Schwenz, R. W.; Gilbert, J. V.; Coombe, R. D. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1993, 207, 526.
The measurements described above suggest that the channel
producing NCl(a1∆) is dominant in NCl3 photodissociation at
193 nm. While production of Cl2(X1Σg+) as a cofragment (eq
1) seems reasonable, molecular chlorine would not make a
significant contribution to the quenching processes observed in
the system, in particular the rapid quenching of excited I(52P1/2
)
(12) Pritt, A. T., Jr.; Patel, D.; Coombe, R. D. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1981,
observed in the rise of the signals in Figure 5 or the quenching
of NCl(a1∆) reflected in the decay of those signals. It seems
likely that the excited NCl is quenched primarily by collisions
with ground-state iodine atoms and by collisions with other
NCl(a1∆) molecules. For example, the data of Figure 5A exhibit
a decay rate of 360 s-1. From the value of ke and the density of
ground-state I(52P3/2) in the system, NCl(a1∆) quenching by
iodine atoms should contribute about 60 s-1 to this observed
rate. If the NCl(a1∆) density in the system were constant at its
87, 401.
(13) Coombe, R. D.; Patel, D.; Pritt, A. T., Jr.; Wodarczyk, F. J. J. Chem.
Phys. 1981, 75, 2177.
(14) Komissarov, A. V.; Manke, G. C., II; Davis, S. J.; Heaven, M. C.
Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2000, 138, 3931.
(15) Pence, W. H.; Baughcum, S. L.; Leone, S. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1981,
85, 3844.
(16) Manke, G. C., II; Setser, D. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 7257.
(17) Burrows, M. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3546.
(18) Gilbert, J. V.; Smith, L. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 7278.
(19) Henshaw, T. L.; Herrera, S. D.; Haggquist, G. W.; Schlie, L. A. J.
Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 4048.
initial value (4.0 × 1013 cm-3 assuming a quantum yield of
,