Selective and Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensing of ATP
A R T I C L E S
14
beenconsiderableeffortstodevelopfluorescent9orcolorimetric9e,10
sensors for ATP.
ratiometric fluorescent probes for metal ions such as Zn2+
,
16
17
Ag+,15 Pb2+
,
and Cu2+
.
In contrast, ratiometric fluorescent
Recently, Anslyn and co-workers9g reported the intelligent
combinatorial library-based sensors to differentiate between
structurally similar compounds of ATP and guanosine 5′-
triphosphate (GTP), with the help of principal component
analysis (PCA). Hamachi and co-workers utilized a zinc
dipicolyl-appended xanthone,9c acridine,9d or anthracene9i as
new fluorescent chemosensors for ATP. We also reported a new
water-soluble imidazolium anthracene derivative, which not only
differentiates the structurally similar compounds GTP and ATP
but also acts as a potential fluorescent chemosensor for GTP in
100% aqueous solution.11a Wang and Chang11b and Ramaiah
et al.11c showed excellent results regarding GTP-selective
fluorescent chemosensors. On the other hand, UTP and UDP
selective fluorescent chemosensor was reported recently by our
group.11d The latest case was reported by Yellen and co-workers
using the cpFP approach to create an improved cellular ATP
biosensor based on GlnK1.8
However, it is still a challenging task to discriminate a certain
nucleoside triphosphate among various nucleoside triphosphates
such as ATP, GTP, CTP, UTP, and TTP. Indeed, in most
reports,8-11 it is not easy to find an example in which all of
these five nucleoside triphosphates were examined to evaluate
the selectivity, because all of these sensors only contain the
recognition site for triphosphate groups. The distinguishability
of ATP from adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine
monophosphate (AMP) is also urgently desired for an improved
sensor, since ATP is made from ADP or AMP, and its use in
metabolism converts it back into these precursors. The ratio
between ATP and AMP is used as a way for a cell to sense
how much energy is available and to control the metabolic
pathways that produce and consume ATP. Moreover, there are
strong interactions between ATP and ADP on some proteins
such as PII proteins, and the competition between ATP and ADP
leads these proteins to sense the “energy charge” of the
bacteria.12 Then a fluorescent sensor, which can signal the exact
concentration of ATP free from hindrance of other nucleoside
triphosphates as well as ADP and AMP, is needed.
sensors for anions mainly focused on small-sized anions such
as F- and CN-,18d,19 but hardly were developed for nucleoside
18
triphosphates. Hamachi et al. reported sensors for ratiometric
detection of ATP derivatives,9d but the selectivity lacks for
various nucleosides. To the best of our knowledge, compound
1 is the first ratiometric fluorescent sensor for ATP with high
selectivity. It is worth mentioning that a relatively simple
imidazolium receptor can discriminate ATP efficiently from
other nucleoside triphosphates by ionic hydrogen bonding20
between imidazolium (C-H)+ and triphosphate group and by
π-π stacking interaction21 between pyrene and adenine base.
The unique binding mechanism is proposed on the basis of
fluorescence measurements, NMR experiments, and theoretical
calculations.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis. For the synthesis of sensor 1, 1-pyrenemethanol
(2) was treated with phosphorus tribromide in toluene to give
1-bromomethylpyrene 3 in 91% yield. 3 was then reacted with
3.5 equiv of 4 in THF to give monoimidazolium ion 5 in 93%
yield. This intermediate was heated at 90 °C in DMF with
compound 6 for 48 h to give the desired sensor 1 in 27% yield
(Scheme 1).
Fluorescence Behavior of 1 with Phosphate-Containing
Anions. Figure 1 explains the fluorescent changes of 1 upon
addition of H2PO4- (Pi), pyrophosphate (PPi), CTP, UTP, TTP,
GTP, and ATP. Compound 1 displays two distinct and well-
known fluorescent spectra of pyrene moieties in which a peak
at 375 nm can be attributed to the monomeric emission and
another peak at 487 nm comes from the excimer formation. As
in Figure 1, 1 displays fluorescent quenching of excimer peaks
upon addition of nucleoside triphosphates. On the other hand,
Pi or PPi shows no change or induces very small quenching
effects. The quenching effects of these excimer peaks are ATP
= GTP > TTP = UTP > CTP. However, most importantly, only
ATP induces a large enhancement in the monomeric fluorescent
peak of 1. This unique change allows an easy discrimination of
ATP from the structurally similar nucleoside triphosphates. From
Herein, we report a new ATP selective fluorescent sensor,
which can display a unique ratiometric fluorescent change only
with ATP among similar nucleoside triphosphates. The ratio-
metric fluorescence signals can effectively discriminate ATP
from ADP and AMP. Ratiometric fluorescent measurements
observe changes in the ratio of the intensities of the emission
at two wavelengths.13 Thus, ratiometric fluorescent sensors have
an important feature that they can use to evaluate the analyte
concentration and provide built-in correction for environmental
effects. Up to now, many investigations were conducted to make
(14) (a) Taki, M.; Wolford, J. L.; O’Halloran, T. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 712–713. (b) Maruyama, S.; Kikuchi, K.; Hirano, T.; Urano,
Y.; Nagano, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10650–10651.
(15) Yang, R.; Chan, W.; Lee, A. W. M.; Xia, P.; Zhang, H.; Li, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2884–2885.
(16) Deo, S.; Godwin, H. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 174–175.
(17) (a) Xu, Z.; Qian, X.; Cui, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3029–3032. (b) Xu,
Z.; Xiao, Y.; Qian, X.; Cui, J.; Cui, D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 889–892.
(18) (a) DiCesare, N.; Lakowicz, J. R. Anal. Biochem. 2002, 301, 111–
119. (b) Xu, Z.; Kim, S. K.; Han, S. J.; Lee, C.; Kociok-Kohn, G.;
James, T. D.; Yoon, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 18, 3058–3065. (c)
Tan, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhu, D. J. Mater. Chem. 2007,
17, 1964–1968. (d) Parab, K.; Venkatasubbaiah, K.; Jakle, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12879–12885. (e) Liu, Z.; Shi, M.; Li, F.; Fang,
Q.; Chen, Z.; Yi, T.; Huang, C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5481–5484. (f)
Zhou, G.; Baumgarten, M.; Mulle, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
12477–12484.
(10) (a) Sanceno´n, F.; Descalzo, A. B.; Mart´ınez-Ma´n˜ez, R.; Miranda,
M. A.; Soto, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2640–2643. (b) Jose,
D. A.; Mishra, S.; Ghosh, A.; Shrivastav, A.; Mishra, S. K.; Das, A.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1979–1982. (c) Kejik, Z.; Zaruba, K.; Michalik,
D.; Sebek, J.; Dian, J.; Pataridis, S.; Volka, K.; Kral, V. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 14, 1533–1535.
(11) (a) Kwon, J. Y.; Singh, N. J.; Kim, H.; Kim, S. K.; Kim, K. S.; Yoon,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8892–8893. (b) Wang, S.; Chang,
Y.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10380–10381. (c) Neelakandan,
P. P.; Hariharan, M.; Ramaiah, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
11334–11335. (d) Chen, X.; Jou, M. J.; Yoon, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
2181–2184.
(19) (a) Lou, X.; Zhang, L.; Qin, J.; Li, Z. Chem.Commun. 2008, 44, 5848–
5850. (b) Chen, C.; Chen, Y.; Chen, C.; Sun, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
5053–5056.
(20) (a) Kim, S. K.; Singh, N. J.; Kim, S. J.; Kim, H. G.; Kim, J. K.; Lee,
J. W.; Kim, K. S.; Yoon, J. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2083–2086. (b)
Ihm, H.; Yun, S.; Kim, H. G.; Kim, J. K.; Kim, K. S. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 2897–2900. (c) Yoon, J.; Kim, S. K.; Singh, N. J.; Kim, K. S. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2006, 35, 355–360.
(12) (a) Wolfe, D. M.; Zhang, Y.; Roberts, G. P. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189,
6861–6869. (b) Jiang, P.; Ninfa, A. J. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 12979–
12996.
(13) Grynkiewicz, G.; Poenie, M.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260,
3440–3450.
(21) Kim, K. S.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Lee, J. Y. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 4145–
4185.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 42, 2009 15529