Organic Letters
Letter
Scheme 1. Preparation of Difluoromethyl Thioesters from
Aldehydes
Table 1. Optimization of the Conditions for Photoredox
Difluoromethylthiolation
a
b
entry
variation from the standard conditions
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
none
90
64
71
58
77
74
71
45
NR
14
NR
16
Na2CO3 instead of NaHCO3
K3PO4 instead of NaHCO3
DCE instead of CH3CN
1.5 equiv of 2
2 mol % TBADT
20 mol % NaHCO3
no NaHCO3
470 nm LED
air
no light
no TBADT
10
11
12
we needed to overcome is that PhSO2 radical cannot abstract
the hydrogen atom from the aldehyde because of the polarity
mismatch.14
a
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.6 mmol), tetrabutylammo-
We hypothesized that this challenge could be overcome with
a hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) photocatalyst. As part of our
ongoing work on photoredox catalysis,15 we recently
developed a protocol for deuteration reactions of aldehydes
mediated by a synergistic combination of photoredox HAT
and thiol catalysis; in these reactions, the HAT photocatalyst
generates the acyl radical and is subsequently oxidized by a
thiol radical to complete the photoredox cycle.16 On the basis
of that previous work, we wondered whether a PhSO2 radical
could oxidize the HAT photocatalyst, and we set about
exploring this possibility. Herein we report that difluorome-
thylthiolation of aldehydes with PhSO2SCF2H can be
accomplished with a decatungstate photocatalyst under
oxidant-free conditions (Scheme 1B).
At the outset, we investigated the difluoromethylthiolation
of 2-naphthaldehyde (1a) (1.0 equiv) with PhSO2SCF2H (2)
(3.0 equiv) in the presence of a base at 30 °C with
tetrabutylammonium decatungstate (TBADT) as the HAT
photocatalyst under irradiation with 36 W, 390 nm LEDs
(Table 1). We began by screening several bases with
acetonitrile as the solvent. With NaHCO3 (1.5 equiv) as the
base, the desired difluoromethyl thioester 3a was obtained in
90% yield (entry 1); the other tested bases led to lower yields
(entries 2 and 3). Using 1,2-dichloroethane as the solvent
decreased the yield (entry 4), as did reducing the amount of
PhSO2SCF2H, TBADT, or NaHCO3 (entries 5−7). When the
base was omitted, 3a was obtained in 45% yield (entry 8).
There was no reaction when a 470 nm LED was used (entry
9), and the reaction under an air atmosphere gave 3a in 14%
yield (entry 10). Control experiments showed that light and
the HAT photocatalyst were necessary for the reaction (entries
11 and 12).
nium decatungstate (TBADT) (0.008 mmol), NaHCO3 (0.3 mmol),
b
CH3CN (1 mL), Ar atmosphere. DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane. Yields
were determined by 18F NMR spectroscopy using fluorobenzene as
the internal standard. NR = no reaction.
particularly encouraged by the outcome of reactions of
halogenated aldehydes (3c−f) since 50% of the market-leading
drugs contain halogens because their reduced susceptibility to
oxidation by cytochrome P450.17 Moreover, halogenated
molecules can rapidly generate molecular complexity via
cross-coupling reactions.18 A fluorine atom and a trifluor-
omethyl group, which may improve the activity of
pharmaceutical lead compounds, were suitable for this
reaction, affording moderate yields of 3f and 3g (64% and
49%, respectively). In addition, benzaldehydes with electroni-
cally neutral functional groups, for example, isopropyl, tert-
butyl, and phenyl, were also compatible with the reaction,
giving good yields of 3h−k. Moreover, electron-rich
benzaldehydes were reactive (3l−p, 44−72% yield). Especially
3l and 3p, which have an active hydrogen, are compatible with
this reaction in moderate yields. However, 3l and 3p were
obtained in lower yields with previously reported conditions.11
A benzaldehyde with an electron-withdrawing ester group was
smoothly transformed into the corresponding difluoromethyl
thioester 3q in 51% yield. Intriguingly, benzaldehydes with
relatively sensitive yet versatile alkyne (3r) and cyclic ether
(3s) functional groups tolerated the difluoromethylthiolation
conditions well. Polysubstituted aldehydes afforded the
corresponding difluoromethyl thioesters in moderate yields
(3t−v). Heteroaromatic moieties are prevalent motifs in drugs,
and we found that S- and N-heteroarenes were also compatible
with the difluoromethylthiolation conditions (3w−y). In
addition, when the reaction was scaled up to 6 mmol, 3d
was isolated in 65% yield.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we explored
the scope of aldehydes (Scheme 2). First, we found that
difluoromethyl thioester 3a could be isolated in 86% yield,
which indicated that decomposition of the difluoromethyl
thioester was minimal. The reaction has a broad substrate
scope and was amenable to oxidant-sensitive functional groups,
for example, an alkyne; −OMe, −SMe, −OH, and −OBn
groups; an amide; and a cyclic ether. Specifically, 6-methoxy-2-
naphthaldehyde afforded 3b in 81% yield. Benzaldehydes
bearing substituents with various electronic and steric
properties afforded difluoromethyl thioesters 3c−v. We were
Aliphatic aldehydes constitute a greater part of the −CHO
family compared with aromatic aldehydes. We were pleased to
find that in addition to aromatic aldehydes, several aliphatic
aldehydes were suitable substrates for our protocol, affording
difluoromethyl thioester products 3z−cc in 49−67% yield, and
no products of CO dissociation were observed (Scheme 2). It
is worth mentioning that 3bb, which has an oxidant-sensitive
position, tolerated the difluoromethylthiolation conditions
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX