916
K.-C. Luk et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 913–917
Table 2. FACS cell cycle analysis of SW480 cells treated with 7q
Concentration of 7q
Lane, D. P. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 1213. (b) Sielecki,
T. M.; Boylan, J. F.; Benfield, P. A.; Trainor, G. L. J.
Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1.
5. Dermatakis, A.; Luk, K.-C.; DePinto, W. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2003, 11, 1873.
Time of
treatment
0 nM
92 nM
270 nM
6. (a) Schulze-Gahmen, U.; De Bondt, H.; Kim, S.-H. J.
Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4540. (b) Hoessel, R.; Leclerc, S.;
Endicott, J. A.; Nobel, M. E. M.; Lawrie, A.; Tunnah, P.;
Leost, M.; Damiens, E.; Marie, D.; Marko, D.;
Niederberger, E.; Tang, W.; Eisenbrand, G.; Meijer, L. Nat.
Cell Biol. 1999, 1, 60. (c) Bramson, N. H.; Corona, J.;
Davis, S. T.; Dickerson, S. H.; Edelstein, M.; Frye, S. V.;
Gampe, R. T.; Harris, P. A.; Hassel, A.; Holmes, W. D.;
Hunter, R. N.; Lackey, K. E.; Lovejoy, B.; Luzzio, M. J.;
Montana, V.; Rocque, W. J.; Rusnak, D.; Shewchuck, L.;
Veal, J. M.; Walker, D. H.; Kuyper, L. F. J. Med. Chem.
2001, 44, 4339. (d) Huang, P.; Ramphal, J.; Rice, A.;
Tang, F.; Liang, C.; Wei, J.; McMahon, G.; Tang, C.
Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2001, 42, Abst. 3622.
7. For experimental details, see: (a) Chen. Y.; Dermatakis,
A.; Luk, K.-C.; Liu, J.-J. US Pat. 6,252,068 B1. (b) Chen.
Y.; Dermatakis, A.; Liu, J.-J.; Luk, K.-C. US Patent
6,303,793 B1.
4 h
G0-G1 49.25%
G2-M 18.42%
S 32.33%
G2/G1a 1.94%
%CVb 3.31%
SubG0 13.29%
G0-G1 46.55%
G2-M 14.84%
S 38.61%
G2/G1a 1.95%
%CVb 3.29%
SubG0 11.29%
G0-G1 52.41%
G2-M 14.89%
S 32.70%
G2/G1a 1.95%
%CVb 3.09%
SubG0 11.85%
G0-G1 52.49%
G2-M 18.36%
S 29.14%
G2/G1a 1.95%
%CVb 3.02%
SubG0 11.17%
G0-G1 55.84%
G2-M 15.72%
S 28.43%
G2/G1a 1.96%
%CVb 3.22%
SubG0 13.52%
G0-G1 54.68%
G2-M 15.16%
S 30.15%
G2/G1a 1.96%
%CVb 3.15%
SubG0 11.67%
G0-G1 43.90%
G2-M 21.8%
S 34.26%
G2/G1a 1.95%
%CVb 3.41%
SubG0 14.47%
G0-G1 47.74%
G2-M 38.44%
S 13.82%
G2/G1a 1.94%
%CVb 3.27%
SubG0 43.52%
G0-G1 50.00%
G2-M 35.45%
S 14.54%
G2/G1a 1.94%
%CVb 3.19%
SubG0 46.86%
16 h
24 h
a Ratio between the G2 and G1 cellular fractions.
b Coefficient of variation.
8. Assay details have been disclosed in ref 5.
9. The crystals of CDK2-7o complex were grown at 4 ꢀC by
the vapor diffusion method. CDK2 (1-298) at 12 mg/mL
was mixed with and equilibrated against 10% PEG 3350
and 0.1 M Ches pH 9. 2.5% b-mercaptoethanol was
added to reservoir after mixing of the drop. Cryoprotec-
tant was the same as the reservoir with 20% PEG 3350
and the addition of 15% ethylene glycol. X-ray data was
collected at beamline X8C at the Brookhaven National
Laboratories. Data was processed to 2.0 A with the HKL
package (Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W. Methods Enzymol.
1997 276, 307) to an R-sym of 0.036. The structure was
refined with REFMAC (Murshudov, G. N.; Vagin, A. A.;
Dodson, E. J. Acta Crystallogr. 1997, D53, 240) to an R-
factor/Rfree of 0.234/0.273. The crystal coordinates have
been deposited in the PDB with the accession code 1R78.
10. Protocol for assessment of Rb phosphorylation in SW480
cells: SW480 (2.25Â106 cells/mL) cells were treated with
0.1% DMSO (as the control) or oxindole CDK2 inhibitor
dissolved in DMSO. Cells were treated with compound
concentrations equivalent to the IC50, IC90 & 3ÂIC90 as
determined in the MTT assay. Cells were exposed to drug
for 4 h, 16 h, and 24 h time points. For immunoblotting,
cell pellets were resuspended in PLC lysis buffer, sonicated
briefly and debris sedimented by microcentrifugation at
15,000 rpm at 4 ꢀC. The supernatant was mixed with 2X
SDS sample buffer with 5% b-ME, and equal amounts of
protein per lane loaded onto a 4–20% Tris Glycine gel.
Proteins were resolved by electrophoresis, transferred to
nitrocellulose membrane which was blocked in BSA
blocking buffer (1% BSA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM
NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) overnight at 4 ꢀC. The membrane
was then incubated with diluted 1ꢀ antibody (NEB
Ser807/811 phospho-Rb dilution 1:1000) in BSA blocking
buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was
washed for 30 min with buffer changes every 5 min with
wash Buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1%
Tween 20) and then incubated with 2ꢀ antibody con-
jugated to HRP (anti-mouse IgG-HRP and anti-rabbit
IgG-HRP both at 1:2000) in BLOTTO buffer (5% nonfat
milk powder, 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1%
Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature. The wash proce-
dure was repeated for another 30 min after which specific
binding was detected with ECL (Amersham) folowed by
exposure to a film.
In summary, the lead oxindole 1b was transformed to a
new series of potent inhibitors of CDK2. The potency
optimization of 1b was achieved by the introduction of
propargyl and/or homopropargyl heteroatom substituted
moieties at its C-4 position.
Acknowledgements
We thank Gino Sasso, Vance Bell, Richard Szypula,
Michael Lanyi, and Theresa Burchfield for their analy-
tical and spectroscopic work. We also owe thanks to Dr.
Christine Lukacs for her help with the crystal structure
figures.
References and notes
1. Harper, J. W.; Adams, P. D. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2511.
2. Hu, B.; Mitra, J.; Van Der Heuvel, S.; Enders, G. H. Mol.
Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 2755.
3. For the latest work in this area, see: (a) Tang, J.;
Shewchuk, L. M.; Sato, H.; Hasegawa, M.; Washio, Y.;
Nishigaki, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2985.
(b) Liu, J.-J.; Dermatakis, A.; Lukacs, C.; Konzelman, F.;
Chen, Y.; Kammlott, U.; DePinto, W.; Yang, H.; Yin, X.;
Chen, Y.; Schutt, A.; Simcox, M. E.; Luk, K.-C. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2465. (c) Li, X.; Huang, P.;
Cui, J. J.; Zhang, J.; Tang, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2003, 13, 1939. (d) Mesguiche, V.; Parsons, R. J.; Arris,
C. E.; Bentley, J.; Boyle, F. T.; Curtin, N. J.; Davies,
T. G.; Edincott, J. A.; Gibson, A. E.; Golding, B. T.;
Griffin, R. J.; Jewsbury, P.; Johnson, L. N.; Newell, D. R.;
Noble, M. E. M.; Wang, L. Z.; Hardcastle, I. R. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1939. (e) Misra, R. N.; Rawlins,
D. B.; Xiao, H.-Y.; Shan, W.; Bursurker, I.; Kellar, K. A.;
Mulheron, J. G.; Sack, J. S.; Tokarski, J. S.; Kimball,
S. D.; Webster, K. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13,
1133.
4. For reviews on small molecule inhibitors of CDK2 and
other cyclin dependent kinases, see: (a) Fischer, P. M.;
11. For the cell cycle analysis experiments cells were fixed in