SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
3
2
.2.1. 2-((2ʹ-hydroxy-[1,1ʹ-biphenyl]-2-yl)oxy)-
N-(4-(metylthio)phenyl)acetamide (compound S2)
,2-biphenol (1.07 g; 5.75 mmol) and potassium car-
3. Results and discussion
.1 Design of the sensor 1 structure
3
2
bonate (1.19 g; 8.61 mmol) were mixed and stirred in
The structure of sensor 1 mainly consisting of
a biphenolic skeleton connecting with dansyl and
2-chloro-N-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)acetamide derivatives
was a rigid one that yielded a good optical signal change
upon binding to anions. For the purpose of binding
mechanism, an acidic proton of the –NH amide group
was deprotonated by strong basic anion. Deprotonating
of sensor 1 may induce the delocalised electrons within
the molecules, resulting in a significant change of colori-
metric and fluorescence emission signals.
CH CN (20 mL). The compound S1 (1.86 g;
3
7
.81 mmol) in CH CN was slowly added to the solu-
3
tion. The mixture was stirred and refluxed at 150°C
under N atmosphere for 10 h. The reaction mixture
2
was poured into water and extracted with CH Cl2
2
(
three times). The organic layer was purified by col-
umn chromatography using 9:1 CH Cl /EtOAc as an
2
2
eluent, affording a light yellow solid (0.30 g, 15%). M.
1
p. 174–176°C. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): δ 2.10 (s,
3
3
1
1
1
1
6
H), 4.64 (s, 2 H), 6.93 (m, 2 H), 7.02 (m, 2 H), 7.10 (m,
H), 7.20 (m, 3H), 7.31 (m, 4 H), 8.10 (d, 1H), 9.02 (s,
steps as shown in Scheme 1. 4-thiomethyl aniline and
chloroacetyl chloride were used as starting com-
pounds. The mechanism of compound S1 is
nucleophilic substitution. It was found that the com-
pound S1 has a sharp singlet proton peak of CH2
group as a characteristic peak. Then, compound S2
was obtained by the condensation reaction of com-
pound S1 and biphenol by using K CO as a base.
1
3
H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): δ 166.5, 154.5, 153.3,
3
37.0, 132.8, 132.2, 131.3, 130.0, 129.6, 128.5, 127.2,
27.0, 125.4, 123.3, 121.7, 123.0, 116.9, 116.6, 113.0,
−
1
8.2, 18.7. FT-IR (KBr, cm ) ν = 3314 (N-H), 3160
(
(
O-H), 2926 (C-H), 1653 (C = O), 1530 (C = C), 1276
C-O) Element Analysis for C H NO S (%): C 69.02,
2
1
19
3
H 5.24, N 3.83 found C 69.11, H 5.18, N 3.84. MS: m/z
calculated for C H NO S+Na ([M+ Na ]), 388.10;
found, 388.0961.
2
3
+
+
The percent yield was quite low because the com-
2
1
19
3
1
pound S2 was a minor product. For H NMR spectrum,
the methylene proton peak shifted to 4.64 ppm and
aromatic protons shited towards downfield, indicating
a compound S2 formation. Lastly, the coupling reac-
tion of compound S2 with dansyl chloride was
2
.2.2 Sensor 1
Compound S2 (0.30 g; 0.77 mmol), dansyl chloride
0.17 g; 0.63 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.14 g;
.01 mmol) were combined and refluxed at 150°C in
CH CN (15 mL). After refluxing under N atmosphere
(
1
refluxed at 150°C in CH CN solvent to obtain sensor
3
1
as a major product. The asymmetric structure of
3
2
sensor 1 consists of 4-methythio aniline as a binding
site of anion and dansyl moiety as a signalling unit.
for 8 h, the reaction mixture was poured into water
and extracted with CH Cl (three times). The organic
2
2
layer was dried with anhydrous Na SO . The resulting
2
4
product was purified by column chromatography
using 9:1 CH Cl /EtOAc as an eluent, affording
3
.2 Anion sensing properties of sensor 1 using
2
2
1
H NMR studies
1
a yellow solid of sensor 1 (0.10 g, 21.28%). H NMR,
1
3
1
−3
C NMR and ESI-MS spectra are shown in Figure S1,
H NMR spectra of sensor 1 (5 × 10 M) with different
1
−
−
−
−
−
−
S2 and S3. M.p. 138–140°C H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
anions (F , Cl , Br , H PO , CH COO and C H COO )
d6): δ 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.84 (s, 6 H), 4.45 (s, 2 H), 6.62 (t,
were studied in DMSO-d as shown in Figure 1. In the
6
2
7
H), 6.80 (d, 1H), 7.00 (t, 1H), 7.22 (m, 4 H), 7.42 (m,
H), 7.86 (t, 2 H), 8.46 (d, 1H), 9.38 (s, 1H). C NMR
case of fluoride ion, the NH peak of sensor 1 disappeared
1
3
via deprotonation reaction [14–16]. Meanwhile, the tri-
−
(
100 MHz, DMSO): δ 165.9, 153.5, 147.5, 134.9, 134.0,
plet peak of HF2 species was found at 16.11 ppm as
1
1
1
2
32.5, 132.4, 132.0, 131.7, 131.4, 130.3, 129.8, 129.6,
29.2, 128.8, 128.0, 127.5, 125.8, 123.7, 123.1, 121.7,
20.3, 119.7, 115.7, 113.2, 111.4, 67.2, 60.5, 45.7, 29.8,
shown in Figure S4. In addition, the CH proton peak
2
shifted towards downfield from 4.45 to 4.59 ppm due to
a decrease in electron density. The aromatic protons of
sensor 1 also shifted upfield and downfield due to the
−
1
1.1, 16.8, 14.2 FT-IR (KBr, cm ) ν 3395 (N-H), 2917
−
−
(
(
(
C-H), 1693 (C = O), 1530 (C = C), 1368 (S = O), 1286
C-O), 858 (S-O). Element analysis for C H N O S
%): C 66.22, H 5.34, N 4.44 found C 66.34, H 5.07,
anisotropic effect. In the case of other anions (Cl , Br , H
2
−
−
−
PO , CH COO and C H COO ), the NH peak of sensor 1
3
3
30
2
5 2
4
3
6 5
was moved slightly downfield due to weak hydrogen
bonding. The chemical shifts of aromatic protons
remained unchanged due to the weak interaction
+
+
N 4.66. MS: m/z calcd for C H N O S -H ([M-H ]),
5
3
3 30 2 5 2
99.17; found, 599.1632.