Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Molecules 2014, 19
2574
In search for lipophilic fosmidomycin analogues, Andaloussi et al. resynthesized 7b alongside other
hydroxamate-modified compounds with a bulky heteroaryl moiety such as 7c. Tests conducted with
these compounds revealed that steric constraint in the vicinity of the Dxr active site was deleterious to
inhibitory potency [26]. Other attempts to substitute the hydroxamate group of fosmidomycin with
similar sterically demanding alternatives led to the conclusion that the Dxr active site is very narrow
around the metal cation [27,28]. Nevertheless, the Dowd group recently observed a more efficient
coordination of the metal cation by amide- versus O-linked substituents on the retrohydroxamate of
fosmidomycin [29]. They highlighted the importance of having an aromatic group in the inhibitor
while also suggesting that an alkyl chain between the retrohydroxamate and the aryl group may be
preferable for accessing an alternate binding location.
This paper aims to more systematically investigate the possibilities of replacing the retrohydroxamate
group of fosmidomycin with effective alternative bidentate ligands. Amide derivatives represented by
the general structure 8 were prepared and evaluated. We envisaged a contribution to chelation by
ortho-substituents on the amide-linked aromatic ring. Compounds with a NH moiety between carbonyl
and sulfonyl groups are very acidic (pKa ~ 2). At physiological pH, the presence of a negative charge
at this position would be expected to improve the interaction with the active-site metal ion [30].
Therefore, we included one analogue with a methylsulfonyl group in the ortho position of the phenyl
ring (compound 8h), as well as a (non-aromatic) sulfamate (compound 8m). In order to ascertain the
influence of electronic factors on chelation, aromatic substituents with various electronic properties
were selected.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis
The synthesis of the amide derivatives 8a–i, m–q is outlined in Scheme 1. Carboxylic acid 9 was
readily prepared starting from commercially available ethyl 4-bromo-butyrate and dibenzyl phosphite
as previously described by Kuntz et al. [21]. Anticipation that the cyano substituent on aniline 11q
would be susceptible to hydrogenation later in the synthesis necessitated the use of the diethyl
protected phosphonate 10, obtained from saponification of commercially available triethyl
4-phosphonobutyrate, for reaction with this aniline. With the exception of anilines 11i and 11l, all
other anilines used were commercially available. Synthesis of 11i (Scheme 2) started from 2-nitro-aniline
which was easily converted to the NH-Boc protected form as described by McNeil and Kelly [31].
Subsequent N,N-dimethylation, followed by Boc removal afforded the aniline. Compound 11l was
prepared from 2,6-dihydroxyaniline according to a literature procedure [32].
Anilines are often poor nucleophiles, thus carboxylic acids 9 and 10 were first converted to their
respective acid chlorides by treatment with oxalyl chloride before subsequent nucleophilic substitution
of 11a–m, 11q to generate a small library of the protected amides 12a–m, and 13q in moderate yields.
1
The H-NMR spectrum of 12c displays two peaks at 2.17 ppm and 2.21 ppm for the 2,6-dimethyl
protons corresponding to the E and Z amide rotamers in a 5/1 ratio. Hydrolysis of the tertiary butyl
ester group of 12j with TFA (20% in dichloromethane) further converted this intermediate to 12n.
Using benzyl protection for both the phosphonate and the aryl substituent (12k and 12l) allowed a mild