Synergy in the Reduction of Phosphine-Ligated PdII to Pd0
[
2] a) J. P. Collman, L. Hegedus, J. R. Norton, R. G. Finke, Prin-
ciples and Applications of Organotransition Metal Chemistry,
University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1987, p. 725; b) R.
Mc Crindle, G. Ferguson, G. J. Arsenault, A. J. Mc Alees,
D. K. Stephenson, J. Chem. Res. Synop. 1984, 360–361.
adjusting the concentration of the hydroxides. This is why
such reactions are slower than those performed in the pres-
ence of pure hydroxide ions, whereas the reduction process
is essentially the same. Consequently, in catalytic reactions
performed with the use of tertiary amines and [PdCl2- [3] a) C. Amatore, A. Jutand, M. A. M’Barki, Organometallics
(
PPh ) ] as a precatalyst, it is recommended to add water
1992, 11, 3009–3013; b) C. Amatore, E. Carré, A. Jutand,
M. A. M’Barki, G. Meyer, Organometallics 1995, 14, 1818–
3
2
to facilitate the in situ reduction of [PdCl (PPh ) ] into the
2
3 2
1
826; c) C. Amatore, A. Jutand, M. J. Medeiros, New J. Chem.
0
required Pd complex, the catalytic loading of which is thus
made higher. The catalytic reactions become thus faster in
the presence of water.[
1
996, 20, 1143–1148; d) A. Jutand, F. Lemaître, J.-L. Ricard,
S. Kozuch, S. Shaik, J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 3728–
3734; e) C. Amatore, A. Jutand, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33,
11]
314–321; f) C. Amatore, A. Jutand, A. Tuilliez, Organometallics
2001, 20, 3241–3249.
Experimental Section
[4] F. Ozawa, A. Kubo, T. Hayashi, Chem. Lett. 1992, 2177–2180.
[
5] V. V. Grushin, H. Alper, Organometallics 1993, 12, 1890–1901.
General Procedure for the Kinetic Measurements of the Reduction
of [PdCl (PPh ) ] in the Presence of Amine and Water: The kinetic
2 3 2
measurements were performed by chronoamperometry at a rotating
0
[6] For the characterization of [Pd (PPh ) ] in DMF, see: C. Ama-
3
3
tore, A. Jutand, F. Khalil, M. A. M’Barki, L. Mottier, Organo-
metallics 1993, 12, 3168–3178.
gold disk electrode (d = 2 mm) with an angular velocity of
[
7] For the electrochemical reduction of [PdCl
2 3 2
(PPh ) ] in DMF,
1
05 rads–1 in a cell (see the Supporting Information) containing
see: A. Jutand, S. Negri, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1811–1821.
DMF (15 mL, with nBu
PdCl (PPh (16.8 mg, 0.03 mmol, 2 mm), and EtN(iPr)
0.5 mL, 0.6 mmol). The rotating disk electrode was polarized at
4
NBF
4
0.3 m, as supporting electrolyte),
[8] a) A. J. Bard, L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Funda-
mentals and Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 2001; b)
A. Jutand, Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2300–2347.
[
2
3
)
2
]
2
(
[
9] A diminution of about 13% in the reduction current (not
shown in Figure 2, a) was observed just after the addition of
water (within less than 5 s) because of the dilution induced by
the addition of water (1 mL, ca. 9%). Part of the current de-
crease was also due to the partial formation of complex 4 (not
reduced at –1.2 V) in a fast reaction controlled by the concen-
tration of hydroxide (see text).
–1.2 V vs. SCE, on the plateau of the reduction current of
[PdCl
2
(PPh ]. The decreasing reduction current was recorded ver-
3 2
)
sus time after the addition of H
conversion (Figure 2, a).
2
O (1 mL, 55 mmol), up to 100%
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental details and kinetic curves.
[
[
10] The kinetic law that takes into account the fact that the kinetics
was not investigated under pseudo-first-order conditions for
–
–
Acknowledgments
Cl and HO was determined: ln x – 3.3ln(2.3 + x) + 4 =
–
3 –1
–1.15kre
KClt. KClkre = 2.6ϫ10
s
was calculated from the
plot of ln x – 3.3ln(2.3 + x) + 4 vs. time (Figure S7).
This work has been supported in part by the Centre National de
la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Ecole Normale Supérieure
11] The ring opening of cyclopropylbromoarylamine catalyzed by
[
PdCl
worked only after the addition of water (53% yield)
Scheme S1); see: a) L. El Kaïm, L. Grimaud, R. Ramozzi,
2 3 2
(PPh ) ] in the presence of a base did not work. It
(ENS).
(
[
1] For books, see: a) E.-i. Negishi (Ed.), Handbook of Organopal-
ladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis Wiley, New York, 2002,
vol. I and II; b) M. Oestreich (Ed.), The Mizoroki–Heck Reac-
tion, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2009.
2013, unpublished results; b) R. Ramozzi, PhD Thesis, ENS
University Lyon1, Paris, 2013.
Received: April 30, 2014
Published Online: June 25, 2014
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 4709–4713
© 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
4713