www.eurjic.org
FULL PAPER
Meyer), Elsevier Science, New York, 2004, pp. 679–759; i) N.
Mizuno, K. Kamata, K. Yamaguchi, in: Surface and Nanomo-
lecular Catalysis (Ed.: R. Richards), Taylor and Francis, New
York, 2006, pp. 463–492; j) N. Mizuno, K. Kamata, S. Uchida,
K. Yamaguchi, in: Modern Heterogeneous Oxidation Catalysis
[15] a) W. Adam, D. Golsch, Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 1111–1113; b)
W. Adam, D. Golsch, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 115–119; c) M.
Bonchio, V. Conte, M. Assunta, D. Conciliis, F. D. Furia, F. P.
Ballistreri, G. A. Tomaselli, R. M. Toscano, J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 4475–4480; d) W. Adam, C. M. Mitchell, C. R. Saha-
Möller, T. Selvam, O. Weichold, J. Mol. Catal. A 2000, 154,
251–255; e) K. Sato, M. Hyodo, M. Aoki, X.-Q. Zheng, R.
Noyori, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2469–2476; f) W. A. Herrmann,
R. W. Fischer, J. D. G. Correia, J. Mol. Catal. 1994, 94, 213–
223.
(
1
Ed.: N. Mizuno), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2009, pp.
85–216; k) N. Mizuno, K. Kamata, K. Yamaguchi, Top. Ca-
tal. 2010, 53, 876–893.
[
9] a) Y. Ishii, T. Yoshida, K. Yamawaki, M. Ogawa, J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 5549–5552; b) C. Venturello, R. D’Aloisio, J. C. J.
Bart, M. Ricci, J. Mol. Catal. 1985, 32, 107–110; c) D. C. Dun- [16] O. W. Howarth, Dalton Trans. 2004, 476–481.
can, R. C. Chambers, E. Hecht, C. L. Hill, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
[17] The slight discrepancies between the observed and theoretical
995, 117, 681–691; d) K. Kamata, K. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuno,
1
ratios (2:1) are probably explained by underestimation of the
broad δ = 105 and 332 ppm signal intensities.
Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4728–4734; e) K. Kamata, S. Kuzuya,
K. Uehara, S. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuno, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46,
[18] a) L. Pettersson, I. Andersson, F. Taube, I. Toth, M. Hashim-
oto, O. W. Howarth, Dalton Trans. 2003, 146–152; b) R. I.
Maksimovskaya, G. M. Maksimov, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50,
4725–4731; c) W. G. Klemperer, W. Shum, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1978, 100, 4891–4893; d) J. R. Black, M. Nyman, W. H. Casey,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14712–14720; e) M. Pohl, R. G.
Finke, Organometallics 1993, 12, 1453–1457.
3
768–3774; f) J.-M. Brégeault, M. Vennat, L. Salles, J.-Y.
Piquemal, Y. Mahha, E. Briot, P. C. Bakala, A. Atlamsani, R.
Thouvenot, J. Mol. Catal. A 2006, 250, 177–189; g) K. Kam-
ata, T. Hirano, S. Kuzuya, N. Mizuno, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
1
31, 6997–7004; h) K. Kamata, T. Hirano, N. Mizuno, Chem.
Commun. 2009, 3958–3960; i) K. Kamata, T. Hirano, R. Ishim-
oto, N. Mizuno, Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 5509–5518; j) K. Kam-
ata, R. Ishimoto, T. Hirano, S. Kuzuya, K. Uehara, N. Mizuno,
Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 2471–2478.
1
7
[19] The O signal broadening of bridging oxygen atoms in I is
likely owing to proton exchange between two [{WO(O ) } (μ-
2
2 2
2
–
[20]
O)] units; see ref.
[
10] a) K. Kamata, K. Yonehara, Y. Sumida, K. Yamaguchi, S. Hi-
kichi, N. Mizuno, Science 2003, 300, 964–966; b) K. Kamata,
Y. Nakagawa, K. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuno, J. Catal. 2004, 224,
[20] L. Kimtys, V. Balevi cˇ ius, D. W. Aksnes, J. Mol. Struct. 1992,
270, 161–171.
[21] Upon addition of water ([TPA ·I] = 0.03 m, [water] = 0.25 m)
3
1
7
2
24–228; c) K. Kamata, M. Kotani, K. Yamaguchi, S. Hikichi,
2 2
in the absence of H O , the O NMR spectroscopic signal of
1
7
N. Mizuno, Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 639–648; d) D. G. Musaev,
K. Morokuma, Y. V. Geletii, C. L. Hill, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43,
IЈ appeared in addition to several unidentified O signals. The
intensities of the unidentified signals increased greatly with
time, oxygen was evolved, and the signals of I and IЈ disap-
peared, thereby suggesting the self-decomposition of I. It was
also confirmed by UV/Vis spectroscopy that the intensity of
the 243 nm absorption band characteristic of peroxotungstates
decreased with time in the absence of H O .
7
702–7708; e) R. Prabhakar, K. Morokuma, C. L. Hill, D. G.
Musaev, Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 5703–5709; f) A. Sartorel, M.
Carraro, A. Bagno, G. Scorrano, M. Bonchio, Angew. Chem.
2
007, 119, 3319; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3255–3258;
g) M. Carraro, L. Sandei, A. Sartorel, G. Scorrano, M. Bon-
2
2
chio, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3671–3674; h) T. D. Phan, M. A. [22] Upon addition of 78% H O (2.5 equiv. with respect to
2
2
2
–
Kinch, J. E. Barker, T. Ren, Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 397–
00; i) A. Yoshida, M. Yoshimura, K. Uehara, S. Hikichi, N.
Mizuno, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 1990; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
006, 45, 1956–1960; j) R. Ishimoto, K. Kamata, N. Mizuno,
Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 9062; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009,
8, 8900–8904.
11] a) R. Neumann, M. Gara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5066–
074; b) M. Bösing, A. Nöh, I. Loose, B. Krebs, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 7252–7259; c) M. D. Ritorto, T. M. Anderson, [23] I662 was not much changed, and the sum of the five signal
2 2 2 2 2 2
[{WO(O ) } (μ-O)] ), the signal intensities of [{WO(O ) } (μ-
2
–
4
O)] were much decreased and a new signal appeared at δ =
2
–
662 ppm. It has been reported that [{WO(O ) } (μ-O )] is
2
2
2
2
2
–
2
2 2 2 2 2
generated by the reaction of [{WO(O ) } (μ-O)] with H O ;
2
–
in addition, [{WO(O ) } (μ-O )] has two terminal oxygen
2
2
2
2
4
atoms and no bridging oxygen atom. Therefore, the δ =
[
662 ppm signal is assignable to terminal oxygen atoms in
2
–
5
2 2 2 2
[{WO(O ) } (μ-O )] .
W. A. Neiwert, C. L. Hill, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 44–49; d) N.
Mizuno, C. Nozaki, I. Kiyoto, M. Misono, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
intensities remained almost constant.
1
7
[24] The O signal of bridging oxygen atoms in IЈ was observed at
lower magnetic field than that in I. Therefore, water possibly
works as a proton acceptor to form an inactive nonprotonated
tetranuclear peroxotungstate (IЈ). It has been reported that re-
1
998, 120, 9267–9272; e) Y. Nakagawa, K. Kamata, M. Kotani,
K. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5266; An-
gew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5136–5141; f) K. Kamata, K.
Yonehara, Y. Nakagawa, K. Uehara, N. Mizuno, Nat. Chem.
action rates increase with increase in the W–O bond lengths in
di- and tetranuclear peroxotungstates.[
9g,12]
DFT calculations
2
010, 2, 478–483; g) K. Kamata, K. Sugahara, K. Yonehara,
R. Ishimoto, N. Mizuno, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7549–7559;
h) K. Kamata, T. Yamaura, N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2 2
showed that the W–OW bond lengths (1.93 Å) of [{W O -
4
–
(O ) (μ-O)} ] are much shorter than those (1.99–2.06 Å) of
2
4
2
2
012, 51, 7275–7279.
12] R. Ishimoto, K. Kamata, N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
012, 51, 4662–4665.
other peroxotungstates including I, thereby supporting the idea
that IЈ is inactive for epoxidation (Figure S4 in the Supporting
Information).
[
[
2
–
1
13] a) W. Adam, A. Corma, H. García, O. Weichold, J. Catal. [25] This calculated activation barrier (85 kJmol ) is in the range
–
1
of those (53–99 kJmol ) reported for titanium-substituted
2
000, 196, 339–344; b) W. Adam, C. M. Mitchell, C. R. Saha-
POMs; see ref.[
6a,26]
Möller, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 785–790; c) G. Bellucci, G.
Berti, M. Ferretti, G. Igrosso, E. Mastrorilli, J. Org. Chem. [26] N. S. Antonova, J. J. Carbó, U. Korz, O. A. Kholdeeva, J. M.
1
978, 43, 422–428; d) R. W. Murray, M. Singh, B. L. Williams,
Poblet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7488–7497.
[27] A. B. Pangborn, M. A. Giardello, R. H. Grubbs, R. K. Rosen,
F. J. Timmers, Organometallics 1996, 15, 1518–1520.
H. M. Moncrieff, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1830–1841.
[
14] a) A. Arcoria, F. P. Ballistreri, G. A. Tomaselli, J. Mol. Catal.
[28] W. L. F. Armarego, C. L. L. Chai, Purification of Laboratory
1983, 18, 177–188; b) K. A. Vassell, J. H. Espenson, Inorg.
Chem. 1994, 33, 5491–5498; c) A. M. Al-Ajlouni, J. H. Espen-
son, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9243–9250; d) G. Du, J. H.
Espenson, Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2465–2471; e) F. E. Kühn,
A. M. Santos, W. A. Herrmann, Dalton Trans. 2005, 2483–
Chemicals, 5th ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2003.
[29] M. Postel, C. Brevard, H. Arzoumanian, J. G. Riess, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 4922–4926.
[30] W. Adam, D. Golsch, F. C. Görth, Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 255–
2491.
258.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 1943–1950
1949
© 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim