1
give the title compound 2 as a yellow solid (277.7 mg, 88%), mp
Measurements of O
2
production under UV-A irradiation in an
◦
1
92–193 C. d
H
(600 MHz; CDCl
3
) 10.22 (1H, s, CHO), 9.32
), 3.21 (1H, m,
) and 1.37 (6H, d, J 7.2, iPr). d (150 MHz;
) 191.1, 180.1, 160.4, 159.4, 157.9, 157.7, 148.8, 143.1,
30.5, 42.0, 40.3, 35.9 and 18.3. (Found: C, 52.99; H, 5.14; N,
aqueous solution of 1
(
1H, s, 7-H), 9.00 (1H, s, NCHN), 3.29 (3H, s, CH
CH), 3.16 (3H, s, CH
CDCl
3
1
To examine whether 1 produces O
spectroscopy was used and 4-oxo-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine
4-oxo-TEMP), which reacts with
nitroxide radical, 4-oxo-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyloxy (4-
2
under UV-A irradiation, EPR
3
C
3
1
(
O
2
and produces a stable
1
2
+
6.58; O, 15.00%; M , 316.1290. C14
H
16
N
6
O requires C, 53.16;
3
−
1
1
oxo-TEMPO), was employed as a O detector. The solution of 1
2
H, 5.10; N, 26.57%; M, 316.3155). mmax/cm 1778, 1697 and
643 (CO). The water solubility (5.6 mM) was determined by
UV-spectroscopy.
and 4-oxo-TEMP was placed in a flat quartz EPR aqueous cell,
which was fixed in the cavity of the EPR spectrometer. The EPR
spectrum recording started after 10 s of UV-A irradiation in a
microwave cavity with a light focused from a RUVF-203F xenon
arc-lamp (Radical Research Co., Tokyo, Japan) with a 360 nm
band path filter operating at 200 mW. The EPR spectra were
recorded with the following EPR parameters: microwave power:
5 mW; field: 329 ± 5 mT (9.2331 GHz); modulation: 0.079 mT;
time constant: 0.03 s; amplitude: 320; and sweep time: 2 min. The
intensity of 4-oxo-TEMPO and the hfsc’s were calculated in a
similar way to that shown above. In some experiments, sodium
1
2
-(N,N-Dimethylaminomethyleneamino)-6-formyl-3-o-toluoyl-
pteridine-4-one (3). 6FP (190.0 mg, 1.0 mmol), N,N-
diisopropylethylamine (780 ll, 4.5 mmol) and o-toluoyl chloride
(
460 ll, 3.5 mmol) were mixed in DMF (6 ml) with stirring
under nitrogen for 2 h at room temperature. During this time,
the suspended solid 6FP dissolved. The mixture was evaporated
in vacuo and the resultant brown oil was purified by column
chromatography eluting with chloroform–methanol (99 : 1) to
1
2
give the title compound 3 as a yellow solid (187.8 mg, 52%),
azide was used as a scavenger of O .
◦
mp 140–144 C. d
H
(600 MHz; CDCl ) 10.23 (1H, s, CHO),
3
9
.34 (1H, s, 7-H), 8.94 (1H, s, NCHN), 7.59 (1H, d, J 7.8,
Ph), 7.48 (1H, t, J 7.2, Ph), 7.37 (1H, d, J 7.2, Ph), 7.23 (1H,
t, J 7.5, Ph), 3.20 (3H, s, CH ), 2.88 (3H, s, CH ) and 2.77
(150 MHz; CDCl ) 191.2, 168.7, 160.7, 159.2,
58.1, 158.0, 148.9, 143.1, 142.5, 133.7, 132.2, 131.2, 131.1, 130.6,
Acknowledgements
3
3
This work is partially supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology, Japan to K.M. (no. 15350099), and by the Center
of Excellence (COE) program for the "Establishment of COE
on Sustainable-Energy System", Grant-in-aid for Science and
Technology Promotion from the Ministry of Education, Science,
Sports and Culture, Japan. This work was also supported by
CREST of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation.
(
3H, s, PhCH
3
). d
C
3
1
1
+
26.4, 41.9, 35.6 and 21.9. (Found: M , 364.1286. C18
H
16
N
6
O
3
−
1
requires M, 364.3582). mmax/cm 1743, 1695 and 1633 (CO). The
water solubility (1.0 mM) was determined by UV-spectroscopy.
Oxygen consumption measurements with an oxygen electrode
The O consumption during the reaction of 1 in the presence
2
of NADH was measured polarographically using a Clarke oxy-
gen electrode (model 5300; Yellow Springs Instruments; Yellow
Springs, OH, USA) at 37 C in a 4 ml reaction mixture. The
References
◦
1
(a) B. C. White, J. M. Sullivan, D. J. DeGracia, B. J. O’Neil, R. W.
Neumer, L. I. Grossman, J. A. Rafols and G. S. Krause, Neurol. Sci.,
oxygen concentrationwas calibratedwithair-saturated phosphate-
buffered saline (PBS), assuming that the dissolved oxygen concen-
2
000, 179, 1; (b) N. Maulik, T. Yoshida and D. K. Das, Free Radical
−
1
15
Biol. Med., 1998, 24, 869; (c) K. Fujimoto, R. Hosotani, M. Wada,
J.-U. Lee, T. Koshiba, Y. Miyamoto, R. Doi and M. Imamura, J. Surg.
Res., 1997, 71, 127.
2 (a) M. Sakaguchi, T. Shibata, K. Hattori, H. Hirai, M. Hosono, T.
Aoyama, T. Ikuta, Y. Bito and S. Suehiro, Circ. J., 2004, 68, 241; (b) A.
Calderone, T. Jover, T. Mashiko, K. Noh, H. Tanaka, M. V. L. Bennett
and R. S. Zukin, J. Neurosci., 2004, 24, 9903.
tration in 1 ml of PBS was initially 200 nmol ml . The 6FP
solution was prepared by diluting 60 mM 6FP in 0.1 N NaOH
solution with PBS buffer.
EPR analysis
3
(a) T. Funakoshi, H. Miyata, T. Imoto, T. Arai, N. Endo, K. Makino,
C. H. Yang and E. Ohama, Neuropathol., 2003, 23, 161; (b) H. Mori, T.
Arai, H. Ishii, T. Adachi, N. Endo, K. Makino and K. Mori, Neurosci.
Lett., 1998, 241, 99.
(a) C. Wei, Z. Wang, Q. Wang, A. L. Meade, C. Hemann, R. Hille
and D. J. Stuehr, J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276, 315; (b) K. U. Schallreuter,
J. M. Wood, M. R. Pittelkow, M. Gutlich, K. R. Lemke, W. Rodl,
N. N. Swanson, K. Hitzemann and I. Ziegler, Science, 1994, 263, 1444;
EPR spectra obtained from 1 in the presence of NADH
To determine whether 1 produces ROS in the presence of NADH
and what species are generated, EPR spectroscopy combined
with spin trapping with DMPO was employed. For the sample
preparation, a solution containing DMPO (1.47 M) was employed.
Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) (1 mM) was added
to the solution to avoid baseline contamination. The EPR spectra
were recorded on a Model JES-TE300 spectrometer (JEOL Ltd.;
Tokyo, Japan). The EPR settings were as follows: microwave
power: 5 mW; field: 334.5 ± 5 mT (9.4160 GHz); modulation:
4
(
1
c) C. A. Nichol, G. K. Smith and D. S. Duch, Annu. Rev. Biochem.,
985, 54, 729.
5
6
(a) H. M. Kalckar, N. O. Kjeldtaard and H. Klenow, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta, 1950, 5, 586; (b) O. H. Lowry, O. A. Besswey and E. J. Crawford,
J. Biol. Chem., 1949, 180, 399.
(a) T. Arai, H. Yamada, T. Namba, H. Mori, H. Ishii, K. Yamashita,
M. Sasada, K. Makino and K. Fukuda, Biochem. Pharmacol., 2004,
67, 1185; (b) T. Arai, N. Endo, K. Yamashita, M. Sasada, H. Mori, H.
Ishii, K. Hirota, K. Makino and K. Fukuda, Free Radical Biol. Med.,
0
2
.079 mT; time constant: 0.03 s; amplitude: 500; and sweep time:
min. Sample solutions were placed in a flat quartz EPR aqueous
2
001, 30, 248.
cell fixed in the cavity of the EPR spectrometer. The hyperfine split-
7
A. H. Thomas, C. Lorente, A. L. Capparelli, C. G. Martinez,
A. M. Braun and E. Oliveros, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2003, 2,
245.
2
+
ting constants (hfsc’s) were calculated based on the Mn marker,
which was inserted into the cavity of the EPR spectrometer.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 1811–1816 | 1815