Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.6 (2004)
733
Table 2. Degradation of PP-4 under various conditions
Ph
CO C H
2 5
2
O
decomp.
O
Degradation Conditions
Product yield/%
Conv.
/%
O
O
n/m
Temp
/ꢁC
Time
/h
Addi-
tive
Solvent
Acetone/FA (ratio)
CO C H
2
2
5
Ph
90
1
2
3
5
toluene-d8 none
toluene-d8 none
toluene-d8 none
toluene-d8 none
45.8 52.6/49.0 (1/0.93)
78.7 76.0/63.4 (1/0.83)
88.1 87.8/69.6 (1/0.79)
97.8 83.0/64.8 (1/0.78)
91.0 85.8/81.6 (1/0.95)
42.5 53.4/36.2 (1/0.68)
5,4 structure
2,3 structure
90
90
CHO
O
CHO
O
90
+
+
H
+
110
0.5 toluene-d8 none
OC H
2 5
H
Ph
CO C H
2 5
30 (hꢂ)
30 (hꢂ) 12
r.t.
30
3
toluene-d8 none
toluene-d8 none
O
Ph
2
81.8 85.0/26.0 (1/0.31)
b
Scheme 2.
a
0.5 benzene-d6 NEt3 ꢄ100
3 days ethanol-d6 HRPc
45.7
b
Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) (Table 2). During photoirradia-
tion, the fumaraldehyde monoesters produced by the decompo-
sition of the polyperoxide further reacted via EZ isomerization,
dimerization, and other reactions, leading to a low fumaralde-
hyde to acetone ratio. The addition of a basic compound, such
as triethylamine, induced a rapid decomposition accompanying
by complicated reaction products. The biochemical decomposi-
tion of the polyperoxides by HRP also proceeds via a radical
chain reaction mechanism, providing similar main products dur-
ing decomposition. The polymers degradable via a radical chain
reaction mechanism triggered by various stimuli have a potential
for use in various fields including adhesion, coating, environ-
mental, and medicinal chemistry.
c
aNEt3, 0.24 mol/L. bNot determined. PP-4 25 mg, HRP 1.25 mg.
sis (TG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) in a nitrogen
stream at a heating rate of 10 ꢁC/min. It was confirmed that
the polyperoxides readily and exothermically decompose upon
heating (ꢀH ¼ 163{188 kJ/unit). The onset temperatures of
the decomposition (Tinit) were 72–89 ꢁC for PP-3–PP-6, being
lower than those for the polyperoxides obtained from sorbates.
The maximum decomposition temperature (Tmax) also showed
similar results. The TG and DTA experiments support their ther-
mal stability depending on the structure of the R1 and R2 sub-
stituents on the polymer main chain.
In order to determine the decomposition products, the poly-
peroxides in toluene-d8 in a sealed tube were heated, and the de-
composition products were examined as a reaction mixture by
NMR spectroscopy. A fumaraldehyde monoester was produced
from all the polyperoxides with an alkoxycarbonyl group as
R3, and acetaldehyde, butyladehyde, acetone, and benzaldehyde
were also detected as another decomposition product from PP-1
(or PP-2), PP-3, PP-4, and PP-5, respectively, as expected. As
the decomposition products from PP-5, two further compounds,
cinnamaldehyde and ethyl glyoxylate, were simultaneously
found (Scheme 2). The NMR spectrum of PP-5 suggested the
existence of the 5,4 and 2,3 structures as the repeating unit in
a 2:3 molar ratio. The presence of phenyl and carboxylate groups
leads to attack of a peroxy radical at both the 2- and 5-positions
and the subsequent cross propagation results in the polymer
structure. Nevertheless, the degradation behavior was the same
as that for the other polyperoxides except for four kinds of de-
composition products. The decomposition products from PP-5
consist of compounds with a high boiling point (low vapor pres-
sure at room temperature) and less toxicity, compared to the de-
composition products from polyperoxides derived from sorbates
or vinyl monomers. PP-6 provided the most simple and environ-
mentally friendly decomposition products, i.e., benzaldehyde
and cinnamaldehyde.
This work was partly supported by Nagase Science and
Technology Foundation.
References
1
a) G. Scott, ‘‘Polymers and the Environment,’’ Royal Society
of Chemistry, Manchester (1999). b) E. S. Stevens, ‘‘Green
Plastics: An Introduction to the New Science of Biodegrad-
able Plastics,’’ Princeton University Press, Princeton (2002).
c) E. Chiellini and R. Solaro, ‘‘Biodegradable Polymers and
Plastics,’’ Kluwer, New York (2003).
2
3
H. Staudinger, Angew. Chem., 35, 657 (1922).
Reviews: a) F. A. Bovey and I. M. Kolthoff, Chem. Rev., 42,
491 (1948). b) T. Mukundan and K. Kishore, Prog. Polym.
Sci., 15, 475 (1990). c) A. Matsumoto, J. Adhes. Soc. Jpn.,
39, 308 (2003).
4
5
A. A. Miller and F. R. Mayo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 78, 1017
(1956) and subsequent papers.
a) K. Kishore and K. Ravindran, Macromolecules, 15, 1638
(1982). b) K. Kishore and T. Mukundan, Nature, 324, 130
(1984). c) J. Jayaseharam and K. Kishore, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 120, 825 (1998). d) A. K. Nanda and K. Kishore,
Macromolecules, 34, 1558 (2001). e) P. De and D. N.
Sathyanarayana, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 203, 420 (2002).
f) T. Nakano, O. Nakagawa, T. Yade, and Y. Okamoto,
Macromolecules, 36, 1433 (2003). g) S. Nomura, T. Itoh,
M. Ohtake, T. Uno, M. Kubo, K. Sada, and M. Miyata,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 42, 5468 (2003).
The degradation reaction proceeds via a radical chain reac-
tion mechanism.3b,4 A peroxy bond in the polymer chain is ho-
molitically cleaved during the first step, followed by the succes-
sive ꢁ-scission (also via a radical chain reaction) providing two
kinds of aldehydes alternately. These polyperoxides degrade not
only upon heating but also by other stimuli. For example, photo-
chemical or redox reactions are available for decomposition at
ambient temperature, as well as an enzymatic trigger such as
6
a) A. Matsumoto, Y. Ishizu, and K. Yokoi, Macromol. Chem.
Phys., 199, 2511 (1998). b) A. Matsumoto and H. Higashi,
Macromolecules, 33, 1651 (2000). c) H. Hatakenaka, Y.
Takahashi, and A. Matsumoto, Polym. J., 35, 640 (2003).
Published on the web (Advance View) May 24, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.732