THERMAL STABILITY STUDY OF 4-(1-ADAMANTYL)PHENOL
1301
added and stirring was continued for another 30 min. the value of the calibration factor for 4-(1-Ad)Ph was
The phenol/1-bromoadamantane molar ratio was in 1.1455 0.051.
the range of (4–3)/1.
The qualitative analysis of the components of the
mixtures was performed by GC/MS on an Agilent
6850 gas chromatograph equipped with an Agilent
19091S-433E capillary column (30 m × 250 μm ×
0.25 μm) with an HP-5MS stationary phase and an
Agilent 5975CVL MSD mass selective detector at an
ionizing potential of 70 eV.
The catalyst was separated from the reaction mix-
ture by vacuum filtration and rinsed with hot acetoni-
trile on the filter; the resulting solution was combined
with the reaction products. The solvent was distilled
off under atmospheric pressure, and the excess of phe-
nol, under vacuum. The residue was recrystallized
from acetonitrile; the white needle-like crystals
formed were filtered off and dried at room tempera-
ture. The concentration of 4-(1-Ad)Ph was 99.9 wt %
by GLC after the removal of the solvent.
4-(1-Adamantyl)phenol Thermolysis Reaction Mixture
A typical chromatogram of the 4-(1-Ad)Ph ther-
molysis products is given in Fig. 1:
The products were identified by GC/MS using
the spectral data (EI, 70 eV) from the NIST 2017
library [13].
4-MePh, 4-EtPh, 4-IPPh, and 4-NPPh were addi-
tionally identified by comparing the retention times of
the components of the reaction mixture under study
with the reference standards of the compounds. It was
found as a result that the position isomers of the spec-
ified alkylphenols (APhs) were absent in the 4-(1-
Ad)Ph thermolyzate.
To identify the structure of components 14, 16, 17,
19, and 21–24, we used the data, rules, and
approaches described in [14–19], finding the correla-
tions between the degradation of adamantylarenes in
the mass spectrometer chamber under electron ioniza-
tion and thermal decomposition. The correctness of
this approach is confirmed in the works by Lobodin
and Lebedev [20] and Dougherty [21]. The assump-
tion about the structure of components A1 and A2 (17,
22) was additionally based on the data of the study of
the thermal stability and degradation of 1,3-dimeth-
yladamantane [22], in which similar adamantane cage
opening products due to breaking of one or two bonds
between the bridgehead and bridge carbons were
found. The characteristics of the mass spectra of com-
ponents 12–24 are presented in Table1, and their
structures are shown in Fig. 1.
Procedure for Studying 4-(1-Ad)Ph Thermolysis
The thermal stability of 4-(1-Ad)Ph in the gas
phase was studied in a the temperature range of 703–
753 K (in increments of 5 K) by thermostating in
enclosed reactors—glass capillaries sealed on both
sides. The substances were preliminarily dehydrated,
and the capillary was purged with helium after loading.
The schematic of the oven in which the samples were
thermostated is presented in our paper [12] describing
the investigation of the thermal stability of 4-tert-
butylphenol (4-TBPh). The accuracy of temperature
control in the isothermal zone was provided within
1°C. The time to reach isothermal conditions after
placing the capillary into the oven did not exceed 60 s.
The pyrolysis process was completed by quenching in
a cooled test tube, after which the capillary was slightly
notched by a needle-point file, immersed into a test
tube with a solvent, and broken with a stainless steel
rod. Ethanol was used as the solvent.
The kinetics of 4-(1-Ad)Ph thermolysis was stud-
ied at the conversion value within 30%. In this case,
the number of moles increased by no more than 5% of
the initial value during the process, because of which
an assumption was adopted about the possibility of the
transition from the number of moles of the products to
molar concentration when evaluating the changes in
the thermolyzate composition.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analysis of Thermal Transformations of 4-(1-Ad)Ph
Product Analysis and Identification
The composition of the main products of thermol-
ysis of 4-(1-Ad)Ph at the process temperature of 733 K
selected from the middle of the range under study of
703–753 K is shown in Table 2. All the features
revealed for this temperature point are characteristic
for the entire temperature range examined.
The information about the character of change in
the concentrations of all the individual products and
groups of components in the reaction mixture is
reflected in Fig. 2.
GLC was used as the main method of analysis of
the reaction mixtures. The analysis was performed on
a Kristall 2000M instrument equipped with a flame
ionization detector, a carrier gas flow splitter, and a
quartz capillary column (60 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm)
with the bonded stationary phase SE-30. Helium used
as the carrier gas had the column inlet pressure of
3 atm. The evaporator temperature was 250°C, and
the detector temperature was 280°C.
The quantitative analysis of the composition of the
reaction mixture was performed using the internal
standard method with n-C24H50 (99.9 wt % by GLC);
The analysis of the possible interconversion of the
identified components was based on the existing infor-
mation about the pathways and products of degrada-
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY Vol. 60 No. 11 2020