10242
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10242-10243
Chart 1a
A New Chiral Bidentate (P,S) Ligand for the
Asymmetric Intermolecular Pauson-Khand Reaction
§
§
,§
Xavier Verdaguer, Albert Moyano, Miquel A. Peric a` s,*
,§
†
†
Antoni Riera,* Miguel Angel Maestro, and Jos e´ Mah ´ı a
Unitat de Recerca en S ´ı ntesi Asim e` trica
Departament de Qu ´ı mica Org a` nica, UniVersitat de
Barcelona, Mart ´ı i Franqu e` s, 1-11, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
SerVicios Xerais de Apoio a´ InVestigaci o´ n
a
CO ligands are omitted for clarity.
Campus Zapateria, s/n, UniVersidade da Coru n˜ a
Scheme 1
1
5071, A Coru n˜ a, Spain
ReceiVed May 30, 2000
In the past two decades the Pauson-Khand reaction (PKR)1
has attracted much attention from the synthetic chemistry com-
munity. Although some progress has been achieved lately on the
way to convert the intramolecular PKR into a catalytic enantio-
2
selective process, the intermolecular version of the process has
been left out from most of these advances.3 To turn the
intermolecular PKR into an asymmetric transformation, the use
diastereoselectivity of its formation. The most important step in
the design of such a chiral bidentate ligand was to drive the
coordination of the sulfur in the dicobalt-alkyne cluster to the
cobalt atom not bonded to phosphorus. To obtain such a
coordination pattern, the distance between the P and S atoms
becomes crucial. A methylene link between the sulfide and the
phosphine11 could provide an excellent scaffold for this purpose.
Since no chiral ligands bearing S and P in such close proximity
could be found in the literature, we chose oxathiane 1, which is
readily accessible from natural (+)-pulegone,12 as the starting
material for our synthesis. Chlorodiphenylphosphine was first
alkylated with the lithium anion of 1, generated at low temperature
by treatment with s-BuLi (Scheme 1). The reaction was totally
stereoselective, affording the chiral phosphine 2 (PuPHOS) as a
single diastereomer. The new phosphine was most conveniently
isolated in its borane-protected form 3 as a shelf-stable, highly
crystalline solid in 81% overall yield. The stereochemistry of the
newly formed center was assumed to be the one depicted in
Scheme 1, with the phosphorus substituent equatorial at C-2 of
the oxathiane ring.
4,5,6
of covalently bonded chiral auxiliaries,
chiral ligands on
cobalt,7 and chiral promoters has been explored. The use of
chiral auxiliaries has been extensively investigated by our group,5
and we have introduced the extremely efficient inductors I (Chart
,8
9
,6
1), bearing a sulfide arm that is able to coordinate to the cobalt
complex of the alkynyl derivatives as in structure II, thus
enhancing both the reactivity and stereoselectivity of the inter-
molecular PKR.6
,10
Several phosphines have been used as chiral ligands on cobalt;
however, many drawbacks hamper this methodology, i.e., low
diastereoselectivity in the formation of type III complexes,
cumbersome separation of these diastereomeric mixtures, and
decreased reactivity toward the PKR.
We reasoned that a bidentate ligand, designed to form chelated
structures such as IV, would increase, as for the covalently bonded
chiral auxiliaries, both the reactivity of the complex and the
§
Universitat de Barcelona.
†
Universidade da Coru n˜ a.
(
1) (a) Buchwald, S. L.; Hicks, F. A. In Pauson Khand Type Reactions;
Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., and Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1999;
The free PuPHOS ligand (2) was conveniently generated in
situ by simply heating in toluene the mixture of 3 with 2 equiv
of 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO). Generation of 2 in
the presence of dicobalt hexacarbonyl complexes 4 derived from
terminal alkynes smoothly led to a diastereomeric mixture of
dicobalt tetracarbonyl complexes 5/6. TLC monitoring showed
that at the initial stages of the reaction both diastereomers were
in an almost 1/1 ratio, as was the case with the previously
described nonchelated phosphines.7 Fortunately, and accord-
ing to our expectations, heating the solution for 17-18 h at
Vol. II, pp 491-510. (b) Chung, Y. K. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 188, 297-
3
9
41. (c) Geis, O.; Schmalz, H. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37,
11-914. (d) Schore, N. E. Org. React. (N.Y.) 1991, 40, 1-90.
(
2) (a) Hicks, F. A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7026-
7
2
033. (b) Hiroi, K.; Watanabe, T.; Kawagishi, R.; Abe, I. Tetrahedron Lett.
000, 41, 891-895. (c) Hiroi, K.; Watanabe, T.; Kawagishi, R.; Abe, I.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 797-808.
(
3) The unsuccessful use of chiral phosphines in catalytic intermolecular
PKR is described in ref 2c.
4) Recent examples: (a)Witulski, B.; Gossmann, M. Chem. Commun.
(
,8
1
1
3
999, 21, 1879-1880. (b) Adrio, J.; Carretero, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
21, 7411-7412. (c) Hiroi, K.; Watanabe, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
935.
60-80 °C induced the equilibration of the diastereomers, leading
(
5) (a) Balsells, J.; Moyano, A.; Riera, A.; Peric a` s, M. A. Org. Lett. 1999,
to biased mixtures of complexes in excellent yields (Table 1).
The observed stereoselectivity for this process mostly depended
on the nature of the substituent on the alkyne. While for R ) Ph
no diastereoselectivity at all was detected in the complexation
process (entry 1, Table 1), when the reaction was carried out with
the dicobalt complexes derived from tert-butylacetylene and
trimethylsilylacetylene, the stereoselectivity increased to 3/1
(entries 2 and 3, Table 1). The higher selectivity level in the
complexation process (dr ) 4.5/1) was reached when the complex
of 2-methyl-3-butyn-2-ol was employed (entry 4, Table 1).
Whereas diastereomers 5a/6a could be separated by column
1
, 1981-1984. (b) Fonquerna, S.; Rios, R.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera,
A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 3459-3478 and references therein.
(
6) (a) Verdaguer, X.; Vazquez, J.; Fuster, G.; Bernardes-Genisson, V.;
Greene, A. E.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
3, 7037-7052. (b) Montenegro, E.; Poch, M.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.;
Riera, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 335-338.
7) (a) Brunner, H.; Niedernhuber, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1990, 1,
6
(
7
11-714. (b) Park, H.-J.; Lee, B. Y.; Kang, Y. K.; Chung, Y. K. Organo-
metallics 1995, 14, 3104-3107. (c) Gimbert, Y.; Robert, F.; Durif, A.;
Averbuch, M. T.; Kann, N.; Greene, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3492-
3
497. (d) Hay, A. M.; Kerr, W. J.; Kirk, G. G.; Middlemiss, D. Organome-
tallics 1995, 14, 4986-4988.
8) Castro, J.; Moyano, A.; Peric a` s, M. A.; Riera, A.; Alvarez-Larena, A.;
Piniella, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7944-7952.
9) Kerr, W. J.; Lindsay, D, M.; Rankin, E. M. Scott, J. S.; Watson, S. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3229-3233.
(
(
(11) Edwards, A. J.; Mack, S. R.; Mays, M. J.; Mo, C. Y.; Raithby, P. R.;
Rennie, M. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 519, 243-252.
(12) Eliel, E. L.; Lynch, J. E.; Kume, F.; Frye, S. V. Org. Synth. 1987, 65,
215-223.
(
10) Sulfur coordination to cobalt was first introduced to control the
regioselectivity of the PKR. Kraft, M. E.; Juliano, C. A.; Scott, I. L.; Wright,
C.; McEachin, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1693-1703.
1
0.1021/ja001839h CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/30/2000