R. A. Moss et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 6016–6018
6017
Table 1
Experimental activation parameters for additions of PhCCl to TMEa
Solvent
T (K)
TME (mmol)
Ea (kcal/mol)
D
Hà (kcal/mol)
D
Sà (cal/K mol)
D
Gà (kcal/mol)
Pentane
Octane
Decane
Pentadecane
Heptadecane
276–304
283–322
283–324
292–321
299–326
1.5–7.0
0.75–3.75
0.6–3.0
0.6–3.0
0.6–3.5
À1.77 0.12
À3.28 0.23
À5.15 0.42
À5.76 0.37
À5.89 0.24
À2.37 0.12
À3.88 0.23
À5.75 0.42
À6.36 0.37
À6.49 0.24
À28.04 0.42
À33.39 0.77
À39.65 1.40
À41.12 1.20
À41.24 0.77
5.99 0.25
6.07 0.46
6.25 0.84
5.89 0.73
5.80 0.47
a
All solvents are n-alkanes. Errors are derived from least-squares analyses of the Arrhenius correlations. Both Ea
=
D
Hà + RT and
D
Gà
=
D
Hà À T
D
Sà are evaluated at
T = 298 K.
carbene–alkane additions, more negative than those for the addi-
tion of nucleophilic adamantanylidene to methyl acrylate in pen-
(
D
Hà = À6.4 kcal/mol,
D
Sà = À41 e.u., and
D
Gà = 5.9 kcal/mol (cf.
Hà =
Table 1)). In the idealized gas phase, the calculations predict
D
tane (D
Hà = À4.1 kcal/mol,
D
Sà = À38 e.u.,
D
Gà = 7. 1 kcal/mol).12
À8.2 kcal/mol,
D
Sà = À43 e.u., and
D
Gà = 4.5 kcal/mol, that is,
Extension of the solvent chain to pentadecane or heptadecane does
not seem to significantly affect the activation parameters relative
to the values in decane; the chain length effect appears to operate
between pentane, octane, and decane.
2–3 kcal/mol more favorable kinetically than in alkane solvent.
Overall, the computed activation parameters are quite similar for
all model solvents and do not predict the substantial changes in
D
Hà observed as a function of chain length; the perhaps weakly
We also note that, as expected,5 barriers to the addition reac-
tions appear in the free energies as a consequence of the very neg-
ative entropies of activation. Moreover, in solvents pentane,
expressed trend shown by the computed
from experimental observations. The continuum solvent model
clearly fails to reproduce the significant changes observed in
Hà
and
Sà as the solvent chain length increases.
A PhCCl/TME complex was located in both idealized gas phase
and model alkane solvent calculations. The complexes are posi-
tioned early on the reaction coordinate (Fig. 1) and strongly resem-
D
Sà values is reversed
D
octane, and decane,
D
Sà becomes more negative as
D
Hà decreases.
D
As a result, the positive change in (ÀT
D
Sà) offsets the decrease in
D
Hà, and
D
Gà is effectively constant (ꢀ6 kcal/mol) over the entire
range of solvents. This apparent compensation between
D
D
Hà and
Sà appears to be a common feature of the additions of poorly
ble TS’s structurally, reflecting both carbene–alkene
p-type
stabilized carbenes to highly nucleophilic alkenes like TME.3,4
Recently, we demonstrated that electronic structure calcula-
tions based on density functional theory (DFT), employing the
MN12-SX functional and 6-311+G(d) basis sets,13,14 successfully
described the energetics associated with alkene cycloaddition of
another highly reactive carbene, adamantanylidene.12 From analo-
gous MN12-SX/6-311+G(d) calculations, applying the detailed
SMD continuum model of Marenich, Cramer, and Truhlar for sol-
ute–solvent interactions,15 we obtain the activation parameters
for PhCCl–TME cycloaddition shown in Table 2 (see the Supple-
mentary data for computational details).
electronic interactions and phenyl-methyl -C–H van der Waals-
p
type interactions. In all cases, the complex is both enthalpically
and entropically favored relative to the adjacent cyclopropanation
TS (Table 2). The complexes are 2–3 kcal/mol below the respective
TS’s in free energy, which may suggest that they possess at least
transient stability and hence finite lifetime; however, potential
complex formation will not directly influence the reaction kinetics.
Also, the standard free energies of complex formation are positive
by several kcal/mol (relative to the separated reactants; Table 2),
so we do not anticipate a significant concentration of PhCCl–TME
complex to accumulate in alkane solution.
We note that the calculations predict a steady but miniscule
decrease in activation enthalpy with increasing alkane chain length,
How do we rationalize the unusual solvent effect described
above? The additions of PhCCl to TME in decane, pentadecane, or
viz. computed
D
Hà = À6.1 kcal/mol in pentane and À6.3 kcal/mol in
heptadecane display
D
Hà of ca. À5 to À6 kcal/mol and
D
Sà ꢀÀ40
pentadecane. The computed activation entropies in the model sol-
e.u. The failure of the electronic structure calculations, employing
an implicit solvent model, to confirm the observed trends suggests
that the measured effects are not manifestations of general
solvent–solute interactions; rather, they must be associated with
specific interactions operating at the microscopic level. We pro-
pose that these reactions occur in fully or partially formed solvent
cages of low energy in which reactant diffusion is constrained, not
only due to the presence of the cage, but likely also from the forma-
tion of PhCCl–TME ‘proximity pairs’ or even complexes. An
increase in accessible solvent surface area should increase cohesive
solute–solvent interactions; hence, a longer aliphatic chain should
be able to form more robust and stabilizing cages than a shorter
vents pentane and octane are nearly identical (
À46 e.u.) and hence the activation free energies (
vents are very similar:
D
Sà = À45 to
D
Gà) for these sol-
D
Gà = 7.6 kcal/mol and 7.3 kcal/mol, respec-
tively. For decane and pentadecane, on the other hand, we calculate
nearly identical activation entropies of À43 e.u. and the computed
activation energies in these solvents (ꢀ6.5 kcal/mol) hence differ
by less than 0.1 kcal/mol; they are slightly less than those computed
for pentane and octane, however. Incidentally, for the specific case
of pentadecane the calculations predict
D
ment with the experimental results for this particular solvent
D
Hà = À6.3 kcal/mol,
Sà = À43 e.u., and
D
Gà = 6.4 kcal/mol, which is in very good agree-
Table 2
Computed (MN12-SX/6-311+G(d), SMD solvent model) activation parameters (
D
Hà,
D D DH, DS, and DG)
Sà, and Gà) for PhCCl–TME cycloaddition and thermodynamic parameters (
for PhCCl–TME complex formation in simulated gas phase or alkane solventa
Solvent
D
Hà (kcal/mol)
D
Sà (cal/K mol)
D
Gà (kcal/mol)
D
H (kcal/mol)
D
S (cal/K mol)
DG (kcal/mol)
Pentane
Octane
Decane
Pentadecane
Gas phase
À6.11
À6.19
À6.26
À6.32
À8.22
À45.9
À45.4
À42.7
À42.8
À42.6
7.58
7.34
6.47
6.44
4.49
À6.75
À6.85
À6.92
À6.99
À8.81
À40.1
À39.0
À36.1
À36.0
À34.7
5.22
4.78
3.84
3.74
1.54
a
All solvents are modeled as n-alkanes. Solvent parameters for experimental solvent heptadecane (cf. Table 1) are not available. Activation and thermodynamic parameters
are evaluated at P = 1 atm, T = 298 K.