J Fluoresc (2011) 21:95–104
103
may relax during the course of proton transfer process, i.e.,
proton transfer reaction is multi-dimensional in nature [36,
37]. Interestingly the plot of the variation of Od – H1
distances with Od...Na distances and Od-H1-Na angles shows
a systematic change during proton transfer process (Fig. 4a).
As the PT process proceeds, the Od...Na distance decreases
and attains a minima at 1.47Å, then relaxes back to its
lactam form. Simultaneously, Od-H1-Na angle increases to a
maximum at 1.42Å with increase of RO-H distance and then
returns with the formation of lactam form. This clearly
indicates that proton transfer process is multi-dimensional in
nature [36, 37] and change in Od – H1 distance is coupled
with two other structural parameters, i.e. Od...Na distance and
Od-H1-Na angle. Figure 4b and c show the potential energy
versus RO-H distance for FP2HP and 2HP in the relaxed
calculation where we have performed geometry optimization
at each stage of OH bond length. In both cases the energy of
S0 and S1 states increases with RO-H distance and both the
states exhibit double minima potential. In case of FP2HP,
with respect to the global minimum lactim form the
tautomerization reaction in the ground state has a barrier of
35.84 kcal/mol (Fig. 4b). It is worth to point out here that, in
the gas phase, proton transfer process for transformation
from 2HP to 2PY in the ground state does not proceed at room
temperature and the calculated barrier height at the same level
of theory is 33.3 kcal/mol (Fig. 4c). Comparing the calculated
barrier of FP2HP with 2HP we can easily say that proton
transfer in FP2HP does not occur in the ground state but both
the forms exist because of their very small energy difference.
In the first excited state, the energy barrier for FP2HP* to
FP2PY* transformation along the proton transfer coordinate
is 25.5 kcal/mol and this tautomerization reaction is inferred to
be exothermic one. Very similar results are obtained in case of
2HP. The calculated barrier to the tautomerization of 2HP in
the S1 pathway is 18.1 kcal/mol and is lower than in the
ground state. Therefore, intramolecular proton transfer may
be expected in the excited state for both the molecules in the
S1 surface through the 4-member intramolecular H-bond. The
calculated S0–S1 transition energy for the lactim and lactam
form obtained from the PES (Fig. 4b and c) are found to be
106.80 kcal/mol and 93.97 kcal/mol, respectively, and are
consistent with the observed absorption band for lactim and
lactam forms at 268 nm (106.68 kcal/mol) and 312 nm
(91.64 kcal/mol), respectively. The lower absorption intensity
of the lactam from can be established from the calculated low
oscillator strength for FP2PY form (f=0.0395) than FP2HP
form (f=0.0597) (Fig. 5).
and time resolved spectroscopy and quantum chemical
calculations. The polarity and hydrogen bonding ability of
the solvents have prominent influence on the stability of
lactam form rather than the lactim form in the ground state
and their subsequent spectral properties. Spectral signature
predicts the evidence of PT reaction but not of PET
reaction. Thermodynamics parameters such as Ktau0, ΔG0,
ΔH0 and ΔS0 for keto-enol equilibrium obtained by
temperature variation study support the weakening of
four-member intramolecular H-bond with increase of
temperature thereby favoring keto to enol formation.
Quantum chemical calculations at Hartree Fock and
Density Functional Theory levels predict the existence of
lactim and lactam tautomers due to comparable stability in the
ground state. Calculations predict that with increasing polarity
of the solvents, the equilibrium shifted towards lactam tautomer
in the ground state and exhibiting more influential effect of the
polarity of the solvent on the lactam tautomer. The potential
energy curve shows the feasibility of proton transfer in the
excited state leading to keto-lactim tautomerization due to
lowering the barrier energy than in the ground state. The
spectral properties obtained from experimental and theoretical
studies of FP2HP are found to be very similar to that of its parent
molecule 2-hydroxypyridine and the intramolecular H-bonding
is weaker in FP2HP than 2-hydroxypyridine which may be the
cause of higher PT barrier in FP2HP than 2-hydroxypyridine.
Acknowledgement NG acknowledges DST, India (Project No.
Project No. SR/S1/PC/26/2008) and CSIR, India (Project no. 01
(2161)07/EMR-II) for financial support and AS and BKP thanks
CSIR, New Delhi, for Senior Research Fellowship. The authors are
thankful to Dr. Nitin Chattopadhyay of Jadavpur University, Kolkata,
for allowing them to use fluorescence lifetime measurement set-up.
References
1. Parsapour F, Kelley DF (1996) Torsional and proton transfer
dynamics in substituted 3-hydroxyflavones. J Phys Chem
100:2791–2798
2. Sytnik A, Kasha M (1994) Excited-state intramolecular proton
transfer as a fluorescence probe for protein binding-site static
polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8627–8630
3. Kim S, Park SY (2003) Photochemically gated protonation
effected by intramolecular hydrogen bonding: towards stable
fluorescence imaging in polymer films. Adv Mater 15:1341–1344
4. Catalán J, del Valle JC, Claramunt RM, Sanz D, Dotor J (1996)
Photophysics of the 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)perimidine: on the
fluorescence of the enol form. J Lumin 68:165–170
5. Chou PT, McMorrow D, Aartsma TJ, Kasha M (1984) The
proton-transfer laser. Gain spectrum and amplification of sponta-
neous emission of 3-hydroxyflavone. J Phys Chem 88:4596–4599
6. Acuna AV, Amat-Guerri F, Catalán J, Costella A, Figuera J,
Munoz J (1986) Pulsed liquid lasers from proton transfer in the
excited state. Chem Phys Lett 132:567–569
Summary
7. Sakai KI, Tsuzuki T, Itoh Y, Ichikawa M, Taniguchi Y (2003)
Using proton-transfer laser dyes for organic laser diodes. Appl
Phys Lett 86:081103
The photophysical behavior of 5-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-
hydroxypyridine (FP2HP) has been studied by steady state