4
Tetrahedron
4
3, 7639–7641; c) see ref. 1b; d) Kuramochi, K.; Osada, Y.;
NMR data of (E)-isomer: 0.84 (3H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.86 (3H, d, J =
7.6 Hz), 0.88 (3H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.90 (3H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.40
(1H, m), 1.59 (1H, ddd, J = 14.5, 10.0, 5.7 Hz), 1.66 (1H, ddd, J =
14.5, 10.1, 4.8 Hz), 1.83 (3H, s), 1.96 (1H, m), 3.12 (3H, s,), 4.47
(1H, t, J = 8.6 Hz), 5.10 (1H, dd, J = 10.1, 5.7 Hz), 6.42 (1H, d, J
= 14.8 Hz), 7.04 (1H, m), 7.10 (1H, m), 7.25 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 9.8
Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.41 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d,
J = 7.9 Hz), 8.10, (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 9.95 (1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz),
Kitahara, T. Chem. Lett. 2002, 31, 128–129; e) Murcia, C.; Coello,
L.; Fernández, R.; Martín, M. J.; Reyes, F.; Francesch, A.; Munt,
S.; Cuevas, C. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 1116–1130; f) Fong, H. K.
H.; Brunel, J. M.; Longeon, A.; Bourguet-Kondracki, M.-L.;
Barker, D.; Copp, B. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 43, 7639–7641.
Davies, J. R.; Kane, P. D.; Moody, C. J.; Slawin, A. M. Z. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 5840–5851.
7
8
.
.
1
3
a) Iwata, A.; Inuki, S.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. J. Org. Chem.
6
11.10 (1H, brs); C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d , δ) 18.7, 19.1,
2
011, 76, 5506–5512; b) Uenishi, J.; Kawahama, R.; Shiga, Y.;
21.7, 22.3, 23.2, 24.7, 30.2, 31.5, 37.3, 54.2, 54.4, 106.7, 111.7,
112.0, 119.1, 119.4, 119.8, 121.6, 123.6, 125.0, 136.9, 168.2,
169.3, 172.7.
Yonemitsu, O.; Tsuji, J .Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6759–6762.
Carprino, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4397–4398.
9
1
.
2
4
0. The stereochemistry of compound 13, synthesized from
compounds 10 and 11, was determined by a comparison of NMR
spectra and specific rotations with those of the established
material, synthesized from compounds 10 and 14 under
epimerization free conditions.
19. Analytical and spectral data of (12S,15R)-JBIR-81 (19): [α]D
=
+49 (c 0.1, MeOH), after evaporation from 0.4% aqueous formic
2
D
4
-1
acid: [α] = +34 (c 0.1, MeOH); IR (KBr, cm ): ν = 3297, 2963,
1
1
744, 732; H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d
6
, δ): 0.83 (3H, d, J = 6.5
Hz), 0.84 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 0.86 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 0.92 (3H,
d, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.42 (1H, m), 1.55 (1H, ddd, J = 14.1, 10.0, 4.8
Hz), 1.70 (3H s), 1.79 (1H, ddd, J = 14.1, 11.0, 4.1 Hz), 1.95 (1H,
m), 3.01 (3H, s), 4.53 (1H, t, J = 8.3 Hz), 5.20 (1H, dd, J = 11.0,
1
1
1. Wen, S.-J.; Hu, T.-S.; Yao, Z.-J. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4931–
4
938.
2. N-Acetyl-N-Fmoc intermediate was not observed in TLC analysis
of the reaction media. This suggests that the de-Fmoc reaction is
followed by acetylation.
4
7
.8 Hz), 5.95 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.59 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 9.6 Hz),
.03 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.12 1H, dd, J = 8.3, 8.0 Hz), 7.39 (1H, d,
1
1
3. Jiang, L.; Job, G. E.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003,
J = 8.3 Hz), 7.54 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz), 7.59 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz),
5
, 3667–3669.
7
.98 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 8.89 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 11.2 (1H, brs);
C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d , δ): 18.3, 19.1, 21.3, 22.2, 23.5,
6
1
3
4. a) Pan, X.; Ma, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1809–1812; b) Yang, L.;
Deng, G.; Wang, D.-X.; Huang, Z.-T.; Zhu, J.-P.; Wang, M.-X.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1387–1390.
5. Cesati III, R. R.; Dwyer, G.; Jones, R. C.; Hayes, M. P.;
Yalamanchili, P.; Casebier, D. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5617–5620.
6. Synthesis of compound 17. A mixture of amide 12 (21.2 mg, 74.5
µmol), vinylbromide 8 (36.4 mg, 89.5 µmol), CuI (14.2 mg, 74.5
2
1
4.6, 30.2, 31.2, 36.5, 54.2, 54.6, 103.4, 109.8, 111.6, 118.2,
18.5, 119.2, 121.8, 123.7, 126.8, 135.6, 169.2, 169.5, 173.5;
+
+
1
1
DART-TOFMS m/z calcd. for C24
found to be 427.2699.
35 4 3
H N O [M+H] 427.2704;
2
0. Compound 19 showed a NOESY correlation between the indolic
hydrogen (N1-H) and acetyl protons (18-H). This suggests that the
hydrogen bonding between N1-H and carbonyl oxygen in acetyl
group (C17=O) stabilizes the fifteen-membered cyclic
conformation. This conformation was also supported by the
theoretical calculation performed at EDF2/6-31G* level.
1. The different value of specific rotations between natural and
synthetic compounds was possibly due to an effect of impurities or
corresponding (E)-enamide contained within the sample of the
natural product.
µmol), Cs
dimethylethylenediamine (8.01 µl, 74.5 µmol) and 1,4-dioxane
1.0 ml) in an argon filled sealed tube was heated at 60 °C for 20 h.
2 3
CO (47.2 mg, 145 µmol), N,N’-
(
The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (2 ml) and
filtered through a plug of silica gel and washed with ethyl acetate.
Combined filtrate was concentrated in vacuo. The residue was
subjected to a column chromatography over silica gel; elution with
hexanes ethyl acetate (6/1 to 1/1) gave 17 (33.3 mg, 73%) as an
amorphous solid.
2
2
2. In contrast to additions of formic acid affected specific rotations of
2
3
1
7. Analytical and spectral data of (12S,15S)-JBIR-81 (18): [α] = –
1
13
D
compounds 18 and 19, H and C NMR chemical shifts of these
compounds did not affected by formic acid lower than 1% v/v
formic acid concentration. However, extending time of treatment
with formic acid caused isomerization of the enamide geometry in
case of compound 18, while compound 19 was not observed to
isomerize.
2
3 (c 0.1, MeOH), after evaporation from 0.4% aqueous formic
23 -1
acid: [α]D = –105 (c 0.084, MeOH); IR (KBr, cm ): ν = 3310,
2
δ): 0.73 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.80 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz), 0.81 (3H, d,
J = 6.2 Hz), 0.89 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.41 (1H, m), 1.58 (1H, ddd,
J = 14.1, 8.9, 5.5 Hz), 1.68 (1H, ddd, J = 14.1, 10.3, 4.8 Hz), 1.80
1
6
961, 1657, 745; H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d , major rotarmer,
(
(
3H, s), 1.92 (1H, m), 3.01 (3H, s,), 4.47 (1H, t, J = 8.6 Hz), 5.25
1H, dd, J = 10.3, 5.5 Hz), 5.94 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.62 (1H, dd,
Supplementary Material
J = 10.0, 9.6 Hz), 7.02 (1H, dd, J = 7.2, 6.9 Hz), 7.12 (1H, dd, J =
7
.2, 6.9 Hz), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.53-7.58 (2H, m), 8.07, 1
Supplementary material (general procedures and spectroscopic
3
1
13
(1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 8.92 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 11.30 (1H, brs);
C
data of all new compounds, including IR, H and C NMR, and
NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d
6
, major rotarmer, δ): 18.5, 19.0, 21.6,
1 13
MS, H, C NMR and NOESY spectra of JBIR-81) associated
with this article can be found in the online version. These data
include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most important
compounds described in this article.
2
1
1
4
2.3, 23.3, 24.6, 30.1, 31.1, 36.4, 54.2, 54.3, 103.2, 109.8, 111.6,
18.4, 118.5, 119.2, 121.8, 123.6, 126.7, 135.8, 169.1, 169.2,
+
+
73.2; DART-TOFMS m/z calcd. for C24
27.2704; found to be 427.2688.
35 4 3
H N O [M+H]
1
8. This material also contains a small amount of corresponding (E)-
1
enamide. This (E)-enamide is also shown in the H spectrum of
the natural JBIR-81 at the same geometrical ratio.
The absolute stereochemistry of an aspergilli-
derived peptide enamide, JBIR-81, was determined.
The (Z)-enamide structure was constructed with a
copper (I) catalyzed coupling reaction
Highlights
The concise first synthesis of (12S,15S)-JBIR-81
and its epimer was achieved.