Organic Letters
Letter
Table 1. NMR (Methanol-d4) Data for Prolinimines A (1), B (2), and C (3)
1
2
3
Pos.
δH, m (J in Hz)
δC
δH, m (J in Hz)
δC
δH, m (J in Hz)
δC
furanyl F1
1
7.14, s
125.9
153.1
109.5
110.4
155.7
57.6
7.12, s
125.4
152.9
110.6
7.12, s
126.3
152.7
109.9
109.8
152.4
28.3
2
3
6.37, d (3.3)
6.32, d (3.3)
6.45, s
6.36, d (3.3)
6.15, d (3.3)
4
5
6
4.50, s
4.02, s
prolinyl P1
1′
2′
3′
175.8
66.1
29.4
175.8
66.1
29.5
175.9
66.1
29.4
4.28, dd (8.9, 3.1)
a 2.00, m
4.30, dd (8.9, 3.2)
a. 2.02, m
4.26, dd (8.9, 3.2)
a. 2.01, m
b 2.26, m
b. 2.27, m
b. 2.26, m
4′
5′
2.05, m
23.5
49.9
2.07, m
23.5
49.9
2.06, m
23.5
50.0
a 3.24, dd (16.9, 7.7)
b 3.46, m
a. 3.26, dd (16.9, 7.7)
b. 3.48, m
a. 3.23, dd (16.9, 7.7)
b. 3.46, m
CO2Me
3.72, s
52.7
3.73, s
52.7
3.72, s
52.7
prolinimine C (3) was assigned as shown, with the L-Pro absolute
configuration assigned on the basis of biosynthetic consid-
erations (cometabolite with 2) and total synthesis from L-Pro
(see below).
HRESI(+)MS analysis of 4 afforded a sodium adduct ion
attributed to a molecular formula (C35H42N6O9, Δmmu −2.2),
requiring 18 DBE. Although the quantity of 4 isolated from
CMB-F563 extracts did not allow for the acquisition of 1D and
2D NMR (DMSO-d6) data sufficient for unambiguous structure
assignment, the available data did nevertheless indicate the
presence of an asymmetric molecule containing three each of
furanyl, imine, and N-substituted-Pro methyl ester residues,
accounting for all DBE (Table 2). To solve the structure of 4
required total synthesis.
To confirm structures assigned to 2−3 and assign a structure
to 4, a convergent biomimetic synthesis was designed around the
putative biosynthetic precursors N-amino-L-Pro methyl ester
(5), 2,5-furandicarboxaldehyde (6), and 5-hydroxymethylfurfu-
ral (7) (Scheme 1). In a two-step process, L-Pro (8) was
converted to its N-nitroso methyl ester 9, which was in turn
reduced to 5.2,3 Exposure of 5 to 6 readily yielded the bis-Schiff
base prolinimine B (2), whereas exposure of 5 to 7 yielded the
mono-Schiff base prolinimine A (1) whose structure, including
imine configuration, was assigned by detailed spectroscopic
analysis (Figure 2) and comparisons to 2−4. Significantly,
exposure of 1 to slightly acidic conditions yielded 3, with
accompanying yields of prolinimine D (4). In summary,
prolinimines A−D (1−4) were prepared in nonoptimized yields
of 36, 50, 3, and 1%, respectively, from 8.
A plausible mechanism for the acid-mediated transformation
of 1 to 3−4 involves dehydration to form an activated furanyl
oxonium species, primed for dimerization and the loss of
formaldehyde to yield 3 and trimerization to 4 (Scheme 2). By
contrast, as 2 lacks an acid sensitive allylic 1°-OH moiety, it is
incapable of generating a furanyl oxonium and is inert to acid-
mediated transformation. Although acid modifiers were not used
during the isolation of prolinimines, fractions were nevertheless
acidic due to high concentrations of accompanying phenolic
bisanthraquinone cometabolites.
Figure 2. Diagnostic NMR correlations for 1−4.
sp2 methines (δH 7.12, δC 125.4; δH 6.45, δC 110.6) and one sp2
quaternary carbon (δC 152.9) as well as 5 unattributed DBE and
additional 2D NMR correlations (Figure 2), supported the
structure for prolinimine B (2) as indicated. The E imine
configuration was assigned on the basis of diagnostic ROESY
correlations between H-1 and H2-5′ (Figure 2).
HRESI(+)MS analysis of 3 afforded a sodium adduct ion
attributed to a molecular formula (C23H28N4O6, Δmmu −0.4),
requiring 12 DBE. As with 2, the 1D NMR (methanol-d4) data
for 3 (Table 1) indicated symmetry (i.e., an axis), with selected
resonances and correlations (Figure 2) readily attributed to N-
substituted Pro methyl ester residues linked through an imine to
a bis-furanyl moiety. Identical chemical shifts (δH 7.12) for H-1 in
3 and 2 supported a common E imine configuration, further
confirmed by diagnostic ROESY correlations between H-1 and
H2-5′. The 2,5-disubstituted bis-furanyl moiety in 3 was
evidenced by diagnostic 2D NMR correlations to and from C-
6/H2-6 at the axis of symmetry (Figure 2). Thus, the structure for
Significantly, synthetic samples of 2−4 were chemically
(UPLC-DAD) and spectroscopically (1D and 2D NMR,
HRESIMS, UV−vis, [α]D) identical to those isolated from
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX