September 2008
1327
evaporated to dryness yielding a MeOH–H2O extract. This was partitioned
successively with hexane, CH2Cl2 and n-BuOH (each 3ꢃ200 ml) yielding
after evaporation of the solvents the corresponding hexane (1 g), CH2Cl2
(1.5 g) and n-BuOH (17 g) fractions. Nine grams of the n-BuOH residue was
dissolved in MeOH and purified by precipitation with diethyl ether (2ꢃ250
ml), yielding a crude saponin mixture (5.2 g). This latter was submitted to
the VLC on C18 reversed-phase (12ꢃ3 cm) using H2O (100 ml), MeOH–H2O
mixtures (5 : 5; 4 : 1, each 100 ml) and finally MeOH (100 ml). The fraction
eluted with MeOH–H2O (4 : 1) (435 mg) was submitted to MPLC column
chromatography (Si gel (15—40 mm), system a), yielding 11 fractions, 1—
11. Fraction 1 was rechromatographed in the same conditions to give the
pure compound 6 (5 mg). Fraction 3 was rechromatographed in the same
conditions to give the pure compound 2 (6 mg). Fractions 4, 6 and 9 were
rechromatographed in the same conditions to give the pure compounds 3
(9 mg), 4 (5 mg) and 5 (11 mg), respectively. The fraction eluted with 100%
istry, 31, 2439—2443 (1992).
3) Kubo S., Mimaki Y., Sashida Y., Nikaido T., Ohmoto T., Phytochem-
istry, 31, 2445—2450 (1992).
4) Bernardo R. R., Pinto A. V., Parente J. P., Phytochemistry, 43, 465—
469 (1996).
5) Sautour M., Miyamoto T., Lacaille-Dubois M. A., J. Nat. Prod., 68,
1489—1493 (2005).
6) Sautour M., Miyamoto T., Lacaille-Dubois M. A., Planta Med., 72,
667—670 (2006).
7) Shao B., Guo H., Cui Y., Ye M., Han J., Guo D., Phytochemistry, 68,
623—630 (2007).
8) Chung H. S., Shin C. H., Lee E. J., Hong S. H., Kim H. M., Comp.
Biochem. Physiol. C, 135, 197—203 (2003).
9) Paris R., Vaillant M., Benard M., Ann. Pharm. Fr., 10, 328—335
(1952).
MeOH (200 mg) was submitted to MPLC (system a) to give 10 fractions, 10) Sautour M., Mitaine-Offer A. C., Miyamoto T., Dongmo A., Lacaille-
1—10. Fraction 6 was concentrated to dryness, yielding the pure compound Dubois M. A., Planta Med., 70, 90—92 (2004).
1 (21 mg). The diethyl ether fraction (1.13 g) was submitted to MPLC col- 11) Sautour M., Mitaine-Offer A. C., Miyamoto T., Dongmo A., Lacaille-
umn chromatography (system a) yielding the pure compound 7 (9 mg).
(25S)-5b-Spirostane-3b-ol 3-O-a- -Rhamnopyranosyl-(1→2)-b- -gluco-
pyranosyl-(1→2)-b-D-glucopyranoside (1): White amorphous powder,
Dubois M. A., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 52, 1353—1355 (2004).
12) Sautour M., Miyamoto T., Lacaille-Dubois M. A., Phytochemistry, 68,
2554—2562 (2007).
L
D
HR-ESI-MS (positive ion-mode) m/z: 909.5392 [MꢁNa]ꢁ, (Calcd for 13) Agrawal P. K., Bunsawansong P., Morris G. A., Phytochemistry, 47,
C45H74O17Na: 909.5352). FAB-MS (negative ion mode) m/z: 885 [MꢀH]ꢀ.
255—257 (1998).
[a]D20 ꢀ33.3° (cꢂ0.07, MeOH). IR nmax (CHCl3) cmꢀ1: 3255 (OH), 2980 14) Agrawal P. K., Magn. Reson. Chem., 41, 965—968 (2003).
(CH), 1040 (C–O–C). 1H- and 13C-NMR: see Tables 1 and 2.
15) Yang Q.-X., Xu M., Zhang Y.-J., Li H.-Z., Yang C.-R., Helv. Chim.
Acta, 87, 1248—1253 (2004).
16) Debella A., Haslinger E., Kunert O., Michl G., Abebe D., Phytochem-
istry, 51, 1069—1075 (1999).
(25S)-3b,5b,22a-Furostane-3,22,26-triol 3-O-a-L-Rhamnopyranosyl-
(1→2)-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-b-D-glucopyranosyl 26-O-b-D-Glucopy-
ranoside (2): White amorphous powder, HR-ESI-MS (positive ion-mode)
m/z: 1089.5195 [MꢁNa]ꢁ, (Calcd for C51H86O23Na: 1045.5245). FAB-MS 17) Agrawal P. K., Jain D. C., Pathak A. K., Magn. Reson. Chem., 33,
(negative ion mode) m/z: 1065 [MꢀH]ꢀ. [a]D20 ꢀ69.2° (cꢂ0.053, MeOH).
923—953 (1995).
IR nmax (CHCl3) cmꢀ1: 3355 (OH), 2927 (CH), 1067 (C–O–C). 1H- and 13C- 18) Li Y.-F., Hu L.-H., Lou F.-C., Hong J.-R., Li J., Shen Q., J. Asian Nat.
NMR: see Tables 1 and 2.
Prod. Res., 7, 43—47 (2005).
Acid Hydrolysis A solution of each saponin (3 mg) in 2 N aqueous
19) Agrawal P. K., Magn. Reson. Chem., 42, 990—993 (2004).
CF3COOH (5 ml) was refluxed on a water bath for 3 h. After extraction with 20) Agrawal P. K., Steroids, 70, 715—724 (2005).
CH2Cl2 (3ꢃ5 ml), the aqueous layer was repeatedly evaporated to dryness 21) Sharma S. C., Sharma H. C., Phytochemistry, 3, 683—686 (1993).
with MeOH until neutral and glucose was identified by TLC with a standard 22) Goryanu G. M., Nistryan A. K., Nauka-Farm. Prakt., 1984, 38—39
using CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (8 : 5 : 1). Furthermore, a silylated derivated of
the sugar was prepared according to the procedure previously described.29) L-
Cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride (0.06 mol/l) and HMDS–TMCS (hexa-
(1984).
23) Sharma S. C., Chand R., Sati O. P., Phytochemistry, 8, 2075—2078
(1982).
methyldisilazane–trimethylchlorosilane, 3 : 1) were added to the aqueous 24) Bangani V., Crouch N. R., Mulholland D. A., Phytochemistry, 51,
residue. After centrifugation of the precipitate, the supernatant was concen- 947—951 (1999).
trated and partitioned between n-hexane and H2O, and the hexane layer was 25) Siemann, E. H., Creasy L. L., Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 43, 49—52 (1992).
analyzed by GC. D-Glucose and L-rhamnose were detected.
26) Hanawa F., Tahara S., Mizutani J., Phytochemistry, 31, 3005—3007
Antifungal Activity Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were
(1992).
performed using the broth dilution test.30) For these bioassays three human 27) Oleszek W., Sitek M., Stochmal A., Piacente S., Pizza C., Cheeke P., J.
pathogenic yeasts were used: Candida albicans (IP 1180-79), C. glabrata
Agric. Food Chem., 49, 747—752 (2001).
and C. tropicalis (clinical isolates). The reference compound ketoconazole 28) Bader G., Seibold M., Tintelnot K., Hiller K., Pharmazie, 55, 72—74
(Sigma) was used as positive control.
(2000).
29) Haddad M., Miyamoto T., Laurens V., Lacaille-Dubois M. A., J. Nat.
Prod., 66, 372—377 (2003).
References
1) Ju Y., Jia Z. H., Phytochemistry, 31, 1349—1351 (1992).
2) Sashida Y., Kubo S., Mimaki Y., Nikaido T., Ohmoto T., Phytochem-
30) Quiroga E. N., Sampietro A. R., Vattuone M. A., J. Ethnopharmacol.,
74, 89—96 (2001).