Page 3 of 5
Ple aDs ea l dt oo nn To rt a and sj ua sc tt imo na sr gins
Journal Name
The photoresponsive Ru(bpy)
COMMUNICATION
2
+ 32
2
(dmphen)Cl
2
was tested in the dark precursor to Ru(bpy)
2
(H
2
O)
2
,
and upon photoactivation revealing a phototoxicity index (PI = [IC50 relative to the highly cytotoxic dmphen wheDnOtIe: 1s0te.1d03in9/dCe7pDeTn0d2e2n55tlGy
dark]/[IC50 light]) of 27.5, with IC50 in the dark of 5.5 µM and in the on ML-2 cancer cell line in the dark and upon photoactivation. These
light of 0.2 µM (Fig. 2 and Table 1). A blue LED light source (see ESI experiments clearly indicate that the ruthenium center can act as a
for details) was used to provide metal-to-ligand charge transfer carrier to a cytotoxic diimine ligand. In addition, these findings unveil
(
0
MLCT) photoexcitation. The IC50 of the dmphen ligand was found ~ the potential role of dissociating ligands in the biological mechanism
.02-0.04 µM (difference between light and dark is not significant of action in strained polypyridyl Ru(II) produgs. Finally, this work may
due to plate to plate variability) with and without the presence of aid the development and understanding of new caged PACT drugs
Ru(bpy) Cl indicating that the former is significantly more potent containing cytotoxic phenanthroline or bipyridine derivatives.
2
2
than the latter. Notably, this ligand was also more potent than the
prototypical cisplatin complex which possessed an IC50 of 4.0 µM
when measured under dark conditions, Fig. S6. It is worth noting that Acknowledgements
the bpy ligand was found to have no potency at concentrations lower
than 50 µM on ML-2 cells with IC50 > 100 µM, Fig. S6. In previous
studies, bpy exhibited a moderate cytotoxicity (IC50 ~ 30 µM) on RSK acknowledges financial support from the School Research and
chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line (K562) whereas no potency Development Council at the Lebanese American University and the
30, 31
was detected on MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells.
To further Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (Ref: 05-06-14).
substantiate our findings, Ru(bpy)
2
Cl
2
, a thermal and photochemical
2+
20, 32
precursor of Ru(bpy)
2
(H
2
O)
2
(Fig. S8),
exhibited marginal
cytotoxicity with and without irradiation (IC50 > 100 µM in the dark References
and upon light activation, Fig. 2 and Table 1). These results are
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
. L. A. Torre, F. Bray, R. L. Siegel, J. Ferlay, J. Lortet-Tieulent and A.
Jemal, CA Cancer J. Clin., 2015, 65, 87-108.
. A. S. Abu-Surrah and M. Kettunen, Curr. Med. Chem., 2006, 13,
consistent with a previous cytotoxicity assessment on L1210 and
2
+
HeLa cells whereby Ru(bpy)
2
(H
2
O)
2
was shown to lack DNA
3
3
2+
2 2 2
interstrand cross-linking efficiency. Furthermore, Ru(bpy) (H O)
1337-1357.
was not found to be a potent cysteine protease enzyme inhibitor in
. V. Cepeda, M. A. Fuertes, J. Castilla, C. Alonso, C. Quevedo and J.
M. Perez, Anti-cancer Agent Me., 2007, 3-18.
. M. A. Fuertes, C. Alonso and J. M. Perez, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
a study on isolated enzymes and human cell lysates.34 The
2 2
photoproducts of Ru(bpy) (dmphen)Cl were assessed in water using
ESI-MS experiments under identical irradiation conditions used in the
biological studies. In aqueous medium, it was found that both bpy
and dmphen dissociate in a ratio of ~3:2 (bpy:dmphen) to form the
corresponding polypyridyl Ru(II) aquo species, Fig. S7. In addition,
ESI-MS (Fig. S7-S8) results were supportive of the photochemical
6
45-662.
. N. J. Farrer, L. Salassa and P. J. Sadler, Dalton Trans., 2009, 10690-
0701.
1
. R. Ackroyd, C. Kelty, N. Brown and M. Reed, Photochem.
Photobiol., 2001, 74, 656-669.
. M. R. Detty, S. L. Gibson and S. J. Wagner, J. Med. Chem., 2004,
2
+
formation
Ru(bpy) (dmphen)Cl
significant phototoxicity of Ru(bpy)
line can be largely attributed to the released dmphen ligand rather
of
Ru(bpy)
in water. Based on these data combined, the
(dmphen)Cl on ML-2 cancer cell
2
(H
2
O)
2
from
Ru(bpy)
2
Cl
2
and
2
2
4
7, 3897-3915.
. D. E. J. G. J. Dolmans, D. Fukumura and R. K. Jain, Nat. Rev. Cancer,
003, 3, 380.
. C. Mari, V. Pierroz, S. Ferrari and G. Gasser, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6,
660-2686.
2
2
2
2+
than the formation of Ru(bpy)
2
(H
2
O)
2
which was found to be
minimally potent under our experimental conditions. Peculiarly,
dmphen was also previously found to be potent on L1210 cell line
2
1
1
0. N. A. Smith and P. J. Sadler, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 2013, 371.
1. M. C. DeRosa and R. J. Crutchley, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 233–
3
5
with IC50 ~ 0.25 µM. The mechanistic function of metal binding
chelators, such as dmphen, was proposed to be through two
plausible pathways: binding to free essential metals or to trace-metal
234, 351-371.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2. R. N. Garner, J. C. Gallucci, K. R. Dunbar and C. Turro, Inorg.
35
contaminants in cell culture media. Both mechanisms lead to the
formation of biologically active metal-chelate complexes.35 Despite
the fact that our data clearly shows the potential role of dmphen
ligand in dictating the photobiological activity of the
Chem., 2011, 50, 9213-9215.
3. B. S. Howerton, D. K. Heidary and E. C. Glazer, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2
012, 134, 8324-8327.
4. J. D. Knoll, B. A. Albani and C. Turro, Acc. Chem. Res., 2015, 48,
280-2287.
5. A. N. Hidayatullah, E. Wachter, D. K. Heidary, S. Parkin and E. C.
Glazer, Inorg. Chem., 2014, 53, 10030-10032.
6. J.-P. Collin, D. Jouvenot, M. Koizumi and J.-P. Sauvage, Inorg.
Chem., 2005, 44, 4693-4698.
7. P. Mobian, J.-M. Kern and J.-P. Sauvage, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
Ru(bpy)
2 2
dmphenCl complex, we can’t rule out the contribution of
2
2+
other possible photoproducts such as Ru(bpy)(dmphen)(H
2
O)
which was detected by ESI-MS, Fig. S7. In addition, besides water,
there are multiple potential ligands in biological media leading to the
formation of multiple species that could bind DNA or target specific
2
0
organelles within the cell.
2
004, 43, 2392-2395.
8. V. W. Yam, E. Baranoff, F. Barigelletti, S. Bonnet, J.-P. Collin, L.
Flamigni, P. Mobian and J.-P. Sauvage, in Photofunctional
Transition Metal Complexes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007,
vol. 123, pp. 41-78.
Conclusions
Ru(bpy)
2 2
(dmphen)Cl , a sterically congested and photochemically
labile Ru(II) complexes, was investigated against ML-2 Acute Myeloid
Leukemia (AML) cancer cell line. Upon visible light irradiation in 19. J. V. Caspar and T. J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 5583-
water, either bpy or dmphen ligands dissociate to form polypyridyl
5590.
Ru(II) aquo species. The ligand ejection was more rapid in acetonitrile 20. T. N. Singh and C. Turro, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 7260-7262.
than in water likely due to the better solvation of photoproducts in 21. D. K. Heidary, B. S. Howerton and E. C. Glazer, J. Med. Chem.,
the former solvent. Ru(bpy)
2
Cl
2
, a thermal and photochemical
2014, 57, 8936-8946.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins