Organometallics 2010, 29, 1875–1878 1875
DOI: 10.1021/om100137d
Chemical and Structural Effects of Bulkness on Bent-Phosphinidene
Bridges: Synthesis and Reactivity of the Diiron Complex
t
[
Fe Cp {μ-P(2,4,6-C H Bu )}(μ-CO)(CO) ]
2
2
6
2
3
2
M. Angeles Alvarez, M. Esther Garcıa, Rocı
´ ´
o Gonz ꢀa lez, Alberto Ramos, and
Miguel A. Ruiz*
Departamento de Quı´mica Org aꢀ nica e Inorg aꢀ nica/IUQOEM, Universidad de Oviedo, E-33071 Oviedo, Spain
Received February 22, 2010
t
5
Summary: The steric pressure introduced by the 2,4,6-C H Bu
6
(Cp=η -C H ) having bent phenyl- or cyclohexylphosphini-
5 5
5
2
3
group (R*) in the complex [Fe Cp (μ-PR*)(μ-CO)(CO) ] (Cp =
η -C H ) has pronounced effects with regard to its synthesis,
structure, thermal stability, and general reactivity of the bent
phosphinidene bridge, enabling it, for instance, to react with
hydrogen under mild conditions (ca. 4 atm, 290 K).
dene bridges. These compounds are themselves stable at
room temperature but are also highly reactive under mild
conditions toward a great variety of electrophilic molecules
ranging from simple alkyl halides or chalcogens to alkenes,
alkynes, diazo compounds, and organic azides, to give in
some cases novel or unexpected organophosphorus ligands
coordinated at the diiron center. It was thus of interest to
examine the influence of steric effects in all this rich chem-
istry, which we have done by using a quite bulky aryl group
2
2
2
5
5
5
It is well-known that steric effects have a pronounced
influence not only on the structure but also on the stability
and reactivity of chemical species in general, and examples of
the consequences of introducing bulky groups in molecules can
be found in all areas of chemistry. Within the realm of
organometallic chemistry, for instance, we can quote the use
5
,6
t
(
R*=2,4,6-C H Bu ) as substituent in the phosphinidene
3
6
2
ligand. In this communication we report the preparation and
a preliminary study of the reactivity of the corresponding
diiron complex [Fe Cp (μ-PR*)(μ-CO)(CO) ] (3). As will be
5
5
of η -C Me instead of η -C H ligands or of phosphine
ligands PR having very bulky instead of “normal-sized” R
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
3
shown below, the increased steric demands of the R* group
have pronounced effects at all levels, since significant differ-
ences (when compared to the complexes having PCy and PPh
ligands) are found for compound 3 concerning its synthesis,
structure, thermal stability, and general reactivity.
groups. In this way, novel structures and novel reactivity can
be found that would be otherwise impossible to reach. Recent
outstanding achievements of this strategy are the use of very
bulky aryl (Ar) or silyl (X) groups to build the first examples of
1
stable quintuply bonded dimetal complexes (Cr Ar ) and of
2
2
2
The mentioned phosphinidene complex can be prepared
through a two-step procedure (Scheme 1). First, a double oxi-
dation coupled to deprotonation is induced on the correspond-
triply bonded disilicon species (Si X ), respectively.
2
2
Bulky substituents have been used also in the very active
3
area of phosphinidene (PR) complexes, mainly to stabi-
7
3
d,i,l,m
4
ing arylphosphine complex [Fe Cp (μ-CO) (CO)(PR*H )] (1)
2
2
2
2
lize mononuclear species,
Recently, we reported a high-yield synthetic procedure
but also binuclear species.
by reacting it with 2 equiv of [FeCp ]BF in the presence of
2
4
NaHCO , to give with high yield the cationic phosphide-bridged
3
for the new diiron complexes [Fe Cp (μ-PR)(μ-CO)(CO) ]
2
2
2
8
complex [Fe Cp (μ-PR*H)(μ-CO)(CO) ]BF (2), which dis-
2
2
2
4
plays two terminal CO ligands almost parallel to each other, as
observed for the PCy or PPh complexes. Here we find, however,
the first important effect of the R* group, since the less bulky
phosphide complexes are not formed via two-electron oxidation
of their phosphine complexes, but just following a single-electron
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mara@
uniovi.es.
(1) Nguyen, T.; Sutton, A. D.; Brynda, M.; Fettinger, J. C.; Long, G.
J.; Power, P. P. Science 2005, 310, 844.
(
(
2) Sekiguchi, A.; Kinjo, R.; Ichinohe, M. Science 2004, 305, 1755.
3) Reviews: (a) Aktas, H.; Slootweg, J. C.; Lammerstma, K. Angew.
5
oxidation/dehydrogenation sequence. Apparently, the radical
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2. (b) Waterman, R. Dalton Trans. 2009, 18.
c) Mathey, F. Dalton Trans. 2007, 1861. (d) Lammertsma, K. Top. Curr.
Chem. 2003, 229, 95. (e) Streubel, R. Top. Curr. Chem. 2003, 223, 91.
f) Mathey, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2003, 42, 1578. (g) Lammertsma,
K.; Vlaar, M. J. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1127. (h) Mathey, F.; Tran-Huy,
N. H.; Marinetti, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2938. (i) Stephan, D. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 314. (j) Shah, S.; Protasiewicz, J. D. Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2000, 210, 181. (k) Schrock, R. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 9.
complex emerging from the first oxidation step of 1 is stabilized
by the bulky R* group enough to prevent its spontaneous
dehydrogenation, a matter to be studied in detail in the future.
(
(
(6) Alvarez, M. A.; Garcı
Organometallics 2008, 27, 1037.
(7) Compound 1 was prepared as reported in ref 5 for the related
complexes [Fe Cp (μ-CO) (CO)(PRH )] (R = Ph, Cy). Selected spec-
troscopic data for 1: ν(CO) (CH Cl ) 1936 (m), 1772 (w), 1732 (vs) cm
) δ -21.3 ppm; H NMR (CD
δ 4.71 (s, 5H, Cp), 4.44 (d, JHP = 343, 2H, P-H), 3.99 (s, 5H, Cp) ppm.
(8) Preparation of 2: solid [FeCp ]BF (0.400 g, 1.467 mmol) was
slowly added to a stirred suspension of NaHCO (1.0 g, 11.9 mmol) in a
´
a, M. E.; Gonz ꢀa lez, R.; Ruiz, M. A.
(
l) Cowley, A. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 445. (m) Cowley, A. H.; Barron, A.
R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 81. (n) Huttner, G.; Knoll, K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 743. (o) Huttner, G.; Evertz, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19,
2
2
2
2
-
1
2
2
;
3
1
1
1
4
06.
P{ H} NMR (CD
2
Cl
2
2 2
Cl , trans isomer)
(4) (a) Arif, A. M.; Cowley, A. H.; Norman, N. C.; Orpen, A. G.;
Pakulski, M. Organometallics 1988, 7, 309. (b) García, M. E.; Riera, V.;
Ruiz, M. A.; S ꢀa ez, D.; Vaissermann, J.; Jeffery, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
2
4
3
1
24, 14304. (c) Sanchez-Nieves, J.; Sterenberg, B. T.; Udachin, K. A.; Carty,
dichloromethane solution (30 mL) of compound 1 (0.400 g, 0.662 mmol)
at 243 K, and the mixture was further stirred for 2 h at the same
temperature to give a red solution yielding compound 2 (0.420 g,
A. J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 350, 486. (d) Termaten, A. T.; Nijbacker, T.;
Ehlers, A. W.; Schakel, M.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; McKee, M. L.;
Lammertsma, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4063.
92%) after workup. Selected spectroscopic data: ν(CO) (CH
2
Cl
) δ 181.7 ppm; H
) δ 9.88 (d, JHP = 385, 1H, P-H), 5.32 (s, 10H, Cp) ppm.
2
) 2028
-1
31
1
1
(
5) Alvarez, C. M.; Alvarez, M. A.; Garcı
´
a, M. E.; Gonz ꢀa lez, R.;
(vs), 2000 (w), 1825 (m) cm
2 2
; P{ H} NMR (CD Cl
Ruiz, M. A.; Hamidov, H.; Jeffery, J. C. Organometallics 2005, 24, 5503.
NMR (CD Cl
2
2
r 2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/24/2010
pubs.acs.org/Organometallics