Inorganic Chemistry
Article
spectra were recorded with a Jasco V-550 spectrophotometer equipped
with a Peltier temperature controller. Fluorescence spectra were
measured on an Aminco-Bowman Series 2 spectrophotometer. Mass
spectra were obtained on a Micromass Autospec mass spectrometer.
Elemental analysis data were obtained by Flash EA 1112 (Thermo
Electron corporation) elemental analyzer.
Detection Limit. The detection limit was estimated by plotting the
fluorescence changes of 1 in the presence of TPEN as a function of
3+
28
log[Au ] following the reported procedure. A linear regression
curve was fitted to the intermediate values of the sigmoidal plot. The
point at which this line crossed the ordinate axis was taken as the
detection limit.
pH Effect on Au3 Signaling. The pH effect on Au3+ signaling of
1 was investigated by measuring the UV−vis absorption spectra in a
series of buffered solutions between pH 4.0−9.0. The pH of the
solution was fixed by using acetate (pH 4.0−6.0), phosphate (pH 7.0−
8.0), and tris (pH 9.0) buffer solutions. Final concentrations of probe
+
Preparation of 1. Thiocoumarin 1 was prepared by the reaction of
coumarin 6 (2) with Lawesson’s reagent following the reported
25
1
procedure. Yield, 65%; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl ) δ 8.96 (br d, J
3
=
0.6 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (ddd, J = 8.2, 1.1, and 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (ddd, J =
7
7
.9, 1.3, and 0.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (ddd, J = 8.2,
.2, and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (ddd, J = 8.1, 7.1, and 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.73
3+
1, TPEN, Au , and each buffer solution were 5.0 μM, 0.20 mM, 0.10
mM, and 10 mM, respectively, under the same measurement
conditions.
(
dd, J = 9.0 and 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (br d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 3.45 (q, J =
13
7
1
1
.1 Hz, 4H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H); C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl ) δ
3
+
92.8, 164.4, 160.0, 153.1, 151.6, 139.0, 136.4, 131.4, 126.2, 124.8,
Interference from Au at Higher Temperature. The possibility
+
+
3+
24.4, 122.1, 121.6, 111.9, 111.4, 96.4, 45.5, 12.7. HRMS (DIP) m/z
of the interference from Au by the transformation of Au to Au at
higher temperature was tested. The signaling of AuCl solution by 1
was measured after treatment of the solution at 50 and 80 °C for 2 h in
a water bath. Final concentrations of probe 1, TPEN, and AuCl were
5.0 μM, 0.20 mM, and 0.10 mM, respectively, under the same
measurement conditions.
+
calcd for C H N OS [M] 366.0861, found 366.0857. Anal. Calcd
20
18
2
2
for C H N OS : C, 65.54; H, 4.95; N, 7.64; S, 17.50. Found: C,
20
18
2
2
6
5.56; H, 4.89; N, 7.50; S, 17.72.
Elucidation of Signaling Mechanism by H NMR Spectros-
1
3+
copy. To have evidence for the Au -assisted conversion from 1 to 2,
1
H NMR spectra of 1, 2, and the reaction product of 1 with AuCl in
3
the presence of TPEN were obtained. To a solution of probe 1 (10
mM, in 50% aqueous acetonitrile) in the presence of TPEN (40 mM)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■
Thiocoumarin derivative 1 was prepared by the reaction of
coumarin 6 (2) with Lawesson’s reagent following a previously
was added AuCl (20 mM), and the mixture was stirred at room
3
temperature. After 30 min, the volatiles were evaporated under
25
reported procedure (Scheme 1). The structural motif of
reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by column
1
chromatography (silica gel, eluant: dichloromethane). H NMR
3
+
spectra of probe 1, compound 2, and the reaction product of 1−
Scheme 1. Preparation of Thiocumarin 1 and its Au -
Selective Signaling
3+
TPEN−Au were measured in D O/DMSO-d (1:9, v/v).
2
6
Measurements of UV−Vis and Fluorescence Spectra. Stock
solutions of probe 1 (0.50 mM) and TPEN (10 mM) were prepared in
acetonitrile. Stock solutions of metal ions (10 mM) were prepared in
+
+
+
deionized water by dissolving perchlorate salts of alkali (Li , Na , K ),
2
+
2+
2+
3+
alkaline earth (Mg , Ca , Ba ), and transition metal ions (Fe ,
2+
2+
2+
2+
+
2+
2+
2+
Co , Ni , Cu , Zn , Ag , Cd , Pb , Hg ). Solutions (10 mM) of
Au and Au were prepared from their chloride salts in deionized
water.
+
3+
The UV−vis spectrum of the probe 1 was measured in the presence
and absence of metal ions. The measuring solution was prepared by
mixing stock solutions of probe 1 (30 μL), metal ions (30 μL), and
TPEN (60 μL) in 50% aqueous acetonitrile solution. Among the
tested pH values, pronounced signaling behavior was observed around
pH 4.7; thus, the solution was fixed at pH 4.7 by using an acetate
buffer solution. Final concentrations of probe 1, metal ions, and
acetate buffer were 5.0 μM, 0.10 mM, and 10 mM in water−
acetonitrile (1:1, v/v), respectively. After 1 min of each mixing, the
UV−vis spectrum of the solution was measured. The discrimination
coumarin 6 was selected as a probe because of its prominent
chromogenic change from pink to yellowish green and its
marked off-on type fluorogenic behavior due to the Au -
induced conversion of thiocarbonyl to carbonyl function.
Compound 1 had absorption bands at 366 and 520 nm in a
3
+
1
:1 mixture of acetonitrile and acetate buffer solution (10 mM,
pH 4.7). Upon treatment with various metal ions, prominent
changes in the absorption behavior were observed exclusively
with Au3+ and Hg ions (Figure 1 and Figure S1, Supporting
between Au3 and Hg was attempted by using 2 equiv (with respect
to the metal ions) of additional chelating agents of EDTA, 8-
hydroxyquinoline, cyclam, and TPEN. To compensate the inherent
+
2+
2+
3+
2+
2
+
2+
absorbances of some transition metal ions, such as Co , Cu , and
Information). With 20 equiv of Au or Hg ions, the
absorption band of 1 at 520 nm disappeared almost completely,
and a new band at 463 nm developed. Concomitantly, the
solution color changed from pink to yellowish green. The
absorbance ratio at the two characteristic wavelengths 520 and
3+
Fe ions, in the analytes, the same amount of TPEN was added to the
reference solution. The final concentration of added chelating agent
was 0.20 mM. The fluorescence spectrum of 1 upon treatment with
various metal ions in the absence and presence of TPEN was also
obtained under the same conditions by excitation at 485 nm.
Competition Signaling Behaviors. Under the same measure-
4
63 nm (A520/A4633) of 1 significantly changed from 3.29 to
+ 2+
ment conditions, competitive signaling behavior of 1 toward Au3+ ions
in the presence of coexisting metal ions as background was studied.
about 0.01 for Au and Hg ions (Figure S2, Supporting
Information). The Hg response of 1 was previously reported
by us, but the response of thiocoumarin toward Au is
unprecedented. Other metal ions revealed almost no responses,
and the ratio A520/A463 varied in a narrow range between 3.02
2+
25
3+
3+
Final concentrations of probe 1, TPEN, Au , and all the other
competing metal ions and anions were 5.0 μM, 0.20 mM, 0.10 mM,
and 0.10 mM, respectively, in a mixture of acetate buffered water (pH
4
.7, 10 mM)−acetonitrile solution (1:1, v/v).
+
2+
(
for Au ) and 3.47 (for Ba ). One more thing to note is that
Time Course Plot of Signaling. The time course of the signaling
probe 1 could discriminate the two common oxidation states of
gold(I) and gold(III): compound 1 exhibited a significant
response to Au3+ but almost no responses toward Au . On the
of 1 for Au3 ions was followed by measuring the absorbance of the
+
measuring solution at 463 nm. The concentrations of the probe 1,
+
2+
3+
TPEN, Hg , and Au ions were 5.0 μM, 0.20 mM, 0.10 mM, and
+
0.10 mM, respectively, in a mixture of acetate buffered water (pH 4.7,
other hand, Au ions are known to be unstable to
10 mM)−acetonitrile solution (1:1, v/v).
disproportionation to Au3+ and Au. We checked the possibility
2
881
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic202080v | Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 2880−2884