LETTER
Synthesis of (±)-Stemoamide
1981
The intramolecular propargylic Barbier reaction is an ef-
ficent method for the stereoselective formation of the
azepine moiety of the stemona alkaloids. The very high
selectivity once again achieved makes this reaction a valu-
able method for heterocycle construction.
at the same temperature for 1 h. A solution of
bromodioxolane (8.85 g, 45.3 mmol) in DMSO (60 mL) was
added slowly, and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm
to r.t. After stirring at r.t. for 18 h, H O (250 mL) was added.
2
The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 500 mL), and
the combined organic layers were washed with H O and
2
brine, then dried (MgSO ). The solvent was removed under
4
reduced pressure to give lactam (10.12 g, 92%) as a yellow
oil, which was used without purification. H NMR (500
Acknowledgment
1
MHz, CDCl ): d = 4.98 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.87 (t, J = 4.2
We thank Nanyang Technological University and the Singapore
Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 (grant
T206B1220RS) for support of this work.
3
Hz, 1 H), 3.98–3.92 (m, 2 H), 3.87–3.81 (m, 2 H), 3.58–3.51
(
m, 1 H), 3.46 (q, J = 7 Hz, 2 H), 3.18–3.08 (m, 1 H), 2.57–
2
.48 (m, 1 H), 2.34–2.26 (m, 1 H), 2.18–2.08 (m, 1 H), 2.02–
1
3
1.94 (m, 1 H), 1.76–1.61 (m, 4 H), 1.21 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H). C
References and Notes
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ): d = 174.9, 103.8, 88.9, 64.9, 64.8,
3
6
1.3, 40.1, 31.1, 29.0, 24.8, 21.9, 15.2. IR (neat): nmax
=
(
(
(
(
1) Pilli, R. A.; de Oliviera, M. C. F. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17,
17.
2) Williams, D. R.; Reddy, J. P.; Amato, G. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 6417.
–1
2
972, 2932, 2882, 1693, 1454, 1420, 1283, 1140, 1074 cm .
1
(
14) Brown, D. S.; Charreau, P.; Hansson, T.; Ley, S. V.
Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 1311.
(
(
(
(
(
15) Li, Z. G.; Ganesan, A. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 3209.
16) Petrier, C.; Luche, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 910.
17) Wada, M.; Akiba, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 4211.
18) Mukaiyama, T.; Harada, T. Chem. Lett. 1981, 621.
19) For reviews on indium in organic synthesis, see: (a) Augé,
J.; Kubin-Germain, N.; Uziel, J. Synthesis 2007, 1739.
3) Olivo, H. F.; Tovar-Miranda, R.; Barragán, E. J. Org. Chem.
2
006, 71, 3287.
4) (a) Kinoshita, A.; Mori, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8356.
b) Kinoshita, A.; Mori, M. Heterocycles 1997, 46, 287.
(
(
(
(
5) Sibi, M. P.; Subramanian, T. Synlett 2004, 1211.
6) Gurjar, M. K.; Reddy, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 295.
7) Torssell, S.; Wanngren, E.; Somfai, P. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
(
b) Li, C.-J.; Chan, T.-H. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 11149. For
the use of acetic acid with indium, see: (c) Kang, H.-Y.;
Kim, Y.-T.; Yu, Y.-K.; Cha, J. H.; Cho, Y. S.; Koh, H. Y.
Synlett 2004, 45. For the earliest use of indium in the
propargylic Barbier reaction, see: (d) Isaac, M. B.; Chan,
T.-H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1003.
20) Preparation of Allenol 3
72, 4246.
(
(
8) (a) Bogliotti, N.; Dalko, P. I.; Cossy, J. Synlett 2005, 349.
(
(
b) Bogliotti, N.; Dalko, P. I.; Cossy, J. Synlett 2006, 2664.
c) Bogliotti, N.; Dalko, P. I.; Cossy, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
7
1, 9528.
9) Kohno, Y.; Narasaka, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69,
063.
10) (a) Jacobi, P. A.; Lee, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
(
Acetic acid (117 mL, 2.06 mmol) followed by indium (118
mg, 1.03 mmol) were added to a solution of aldehyde 4 (140
2
(
mg, 0.51 mmol) in THF (2 mL) and H O (0.25 mL) under
2
4295. (b) Jacobi, P. A.; Lee, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
nitrogen at –20 °C. After stirring at the same temperature for
3409.
2
4 h, the reaction mixture was diluted with CHCl (100 mL).
3
(
(
11) Bates, R. W.; Sridhar, S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8104.
12) Hubert, J. C.; Wijnberg, J. P. B. A.; Speckamp, W. N.
Tetrahedron 1975, 31, 1437.
The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 10 min, and filtered
through Celite, washing with CHCl . The solvent was
3
removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was
purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (10 g,
(
13) Preparation of Acetal 6
A mixture of 4-bromobutanal (prepared by DIBAL-H
reduction of methyl 4-bromobutyrate; 3.5 g, 23.1 mmol),
ethylene glycol (3.9 mL, 69.5 mmol), and PTSA (440 mg,
1
.5% MeOH–CHCl ) to give allenic alcohol 4 (81 mg, 82%)
3
1
as a colourless solid; mp 98–100 °C. H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl ): d = 5.11 (t, J = 1.7 Hz, 2 H), 4.35 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1
3
2.3 mmol) in toluene (40 mL) was heated at reflux for 1.5 h
H), 4.18–4.08 (m, 1 H), 3.99–3.94 (m, 1 H), 2.78–2.72 (m, 1
H), 2.48–2.34 (m, 2 H), 2.31–2.23 (m, 1 H), 2.16–2.08 (m, 1
using a Dean–Stark trap. The mixture was cooled to r.t.
Toluene was removed under reduced pressure, and the
residue was purified by flash column chromatography on
H), 1.98–1.86 (m, 1 H), 1.84–1.73 (m, 2 H), 1.68–1.53 (m, 2
13
H). C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ): d = 203.7, 174.3, 110.6,
3
silica gel (150 g, 4% EtOAc–hexane) to give acetal (6, 3.3 g,
8
1.6, 67.8, 58.6, 41.7, 38.8, 30.7, 25.9, 24.7. IR: nmax = 3377,
933, 1954, 1651, 1416, 1364, 1320, 1264, 1202, 1155, 1064
1
73%) as a colourless liquid. H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ):
3
2
d = 4.9 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.98–3.93 (m, 2 H), 3.88–3.81
–1
+
cm . MS (EI): m/z = 194 (100) [M + 1], 187 (9). HRMS:
(
m, 2 H), 3.45 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 2.0 (quint, J = 7.1 Hz, 2
+
m/z = calcd for C H NO = 194.1181 [M + H]; found:
1
3
11 16
2
H), 1.85–1.78 (m, 2 H). C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ): d =
3
194.1181.
103.7, 64.9 (2 C), 33.6, 32.3, 27.1.
(
21) (a) Yoneda, E.; Zhang, S.-W.; Onitsuka, K.; Takahashi, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5459. (b) Yoneda, E.; Kaneko,
T.; Zhang, S.-W.; Onitsuka, K.; Takahashi, S. Org. Lett.
Preparation of Lactam 7
n-BuLi (36.8 mL of a 1.6 M solution in hexane, 59.0 mmol)
was slowly added to a solution of lactam 5 (7.6 g, 59.0
mmol) in THF (80 mL) at –78 °C. The mixture was stirred
2000, 2, 441.
Synlett 2009, No. 12, 1979–1981 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York