30
L. Du et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 878 (2008) 26–31
6 5 6 5 2
Fig. 6. Selected occupied molecule orbitals of C H C(O)ONO and C H C(O)ONO .
increases 0.86 eV due to the change of the molecular orbi-
tal. The peak at 11.95 eV comes mainly from the ionization
References
È
À
ÁÉ
00
ꢀ1
[
[
1] T.S. Dibble, J.S. Francisco, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 5010.
2] P.M. Solomon, R. der Zafra, J.W. Parrish, J.W. Barrett, Science 224
process of 8a nOðNO2Þ
, which is apparently different
from the situation of C H C(O)ONO. Comparison of the
6
5
(
1984) 1210.
3] R.P. Turco, P. Hamill, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 92 (1992)
23.
[4] H.B. Singh, L.J. Salas, W. Viezee, Nature 321 (1986) 588.
molecular orbitals of C H C(O)ONO and C H C(O)ONO
6
5
6
5
2
[
indicates that the sequence of the r orbital of benzyl ring
Fig. 6) is different. The electron from the p orbital of
3
(
3
[5] H. Oberhammer, J. Mol. Struct. 605 (2002) 177.
[6] R. Varma, R.F. Curl, J. Phys. Chem. 80 (1976) 402.
[7] P.H. Turner, M.J. Corkill, A.P. Cox, J. Phys. Chem. 83 (1979) 1473.
[8] P.N. Gosh, A. Bauder, H.H. G u¨ nthard, Chem. Phys. 53 (1980) 39.
[9] K. Endo, T. Koshiba, H. Saito, Y. Kamura, J. Chem. Soc. Jpn. (1980)
1661.
C H C(O)ONO is easier to be ionized, which causes ioni-
6
5
2
zation energy of 12.12 eV. In C H C(O)ONO, the r elec-
6
5
tron on benzyl ring is easier to be ionized than the p3
orbital on the benzyl ring. The ionization energies of
C H C(O)ONO and C H C(O)ONO , which come from
6
5
6
5
2
[
[
10] K. Endo, H. Okamatsu, Y. Kamura, J. Chem. Soc. Jpn. (1983) 327.
11] K. Endo, H. Okamatsu, H. Amada, Y. Kamura, J. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
the r orbital of benzyl ring, are 0.25 and 0.96 eV higher
than that in benzene (11.53 eV) [26].
(
1981) 317.
[
[
[
12] X. Zeng, L. Yao, W. Wang, F. Liu, Q. Sun, M. Ge, Z. Sun, J. Zhang,
D. Wang, Spectrochim. Acta A 64 (2006) 949.
13] D. Wang, P. Jiang, X. Qian, G. Hong, J. Chem. Phys. 106 (1997)
4
. Conclusions
The electronic structures of C H C(O)ONO and
3
003.
14] T. Hertel, J. Jakob, R. Minkwitz, H. Oberhammer, Inorg. Chem. 37
(1998) 5092.
6
5
C H C(O)ONO have been investigated by the combina-
[15] D.A. Sweigart, D.W. Turner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 5592.
[16] A. Obermeyer, H. Borrmann, A. Simon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117
6
5
2
tion of HeI photoelectron spectroscopy and theoretical cal-
culations. The first ionization energies of the two
compounds are determined to be 9.20 and 9.54 eV, respec-
tively. The highest occupied molecule orbitals (HOMOs) of
C H C(O)ONO and C H C(O)ONO are both of the p
(
1995) 7887.
17] M.I. Abbas, J.M. Dyke, A. Morris, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 72
1976) 814.
18] D.C. Frost, S.T. Lee, C.A. McDowell, N.P.C. Westwood, J. Electron
Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 7 (1975) 331.
[
[
(
6
5
6
5
2
orbital on benzyl ring. Meanwhile, the geometries of these
two compounds are optimized at different levels of theory.
Both the two stable conformers have the Cs overall
symmetry, a planar CAC(O)AOANAO skeleton in
C H C(O)ONO and a planar CAC(O)AOAN skeleton in
[19] X. Zeng, M. Ge, Z. Sun, D. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. A 110 (2006) 5685.
[
20] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb,
J.R. Cheeseman, J.A. Montgomery, Jr., T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C.
Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B.
Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A. Petersson, H.
Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa,
M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X.
Li, J.E. Knox, H.P. Hratchian, J.B. Cross, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R.
Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C.
Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, P.Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G.A. Voth, P.
Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, V.G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A.D.
6
5
C H C(O)ONO , respectively.
6
5
2
Acknowledgments
¨
Daniels, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K.
Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A.G. Baboul, S.
Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P.
Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-
Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill,
B. Johnson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, and J.A. Pople,
Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
This project was supported by Knowledge Innovation
Program (Grant No. KZCX2-YW-205) and Hundred
Talents Fund of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
the National Basic Research Program of China (973
Program, No. 2006CB403701) and 863 program (No.
[
[
21] W. von Niessen, J. Schirmer, L.S. Cederbaum, Comput. Phys. Rep. 1
2
006AA06A301) of Ministry of Science and Technology
(
1984) 57.
of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (Contract Nos. 20577052, 20673123, 20473094,
and 20503035).
22] H.G. Ang, M.F. Klapdor, W.L. Kwik, Y.W. Lee, H.-G. Mack, D.
Mootz, W. Poll, H. Oberhammer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 6929.
[23] A.P. Cox, J.M. Riveros, J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1965) 3106.