PHOTOLYSIS OF SOLUTIONS OF 3-tert-BUTYLPEROXY-3-METHYL-1-BUTYNE
631
signals appear, , ppm: 1.22 s [(CH3)3; t-BuOD],
1.46 s [(CH3)2; compound II], 2.16 s ( VH), and
2.01 s (CH3; acetone). No polarization of protons of
these compounds was observed. However, in the range
of signals characteristic of double-bond protons
(5 6 ppm), absorption and lines of reaction products
appear which are not observed in the stedy state. The
intensity of these signals is slightly higher at 333 K.
Thus, the photolysis of peroxide I in cyclohexane-d12
gives rise to a weak chemical polarization of protons
of products with double bonds.
EXPERIMENTAL
3-(tert-Butylperoxy)-3-methyl-1-butyne (I) and bis-
(2-methyl-3-butyn-2-yl) peroxide (III) were synthe-
sized by the procedures described in [10, 11]. The
purity of the peroxides was no less than 99%.
The photolytic and chemical nuclear polarization
studies were performed in two solvents, cyclohexane-
d12 and methanol-d4, since they both are transparent
in the near UV light but give radicals with different
physicochemical characteristics, cyclohexyl and hydr-
oxymethyl and methoxyl, respectively.
The yield of alcohol II in deuterocyclohexane is
higher than in deuteromethanol, especially at 333 K
(Fig. 4b). This is apparently explained by a much
increased contribution of polymerization in the me-
chanism of the decomposition of compound I, as
The kinetics of photolysis of compound I were
studied in methanol-d4 at 293 K and in cyclohexane-
d12 at 293 and 333 K. The concentration of peroxide
I was 0.14 M. The solutions were irradiated in quartz
and Pyrex inserts 3 mm in internal diameter and
60 mm in length, sealed in such a way that the gas-to-
liquid volume ratio was no more than 1:9. Under
these conditions all gaseous photolysis products
almost completely remained in the solution and thus
could be analyzed, both qualitatively and quantitative-
ly. Irradiation was performed with an RSh-500 mer-
cury lamp with a heat filter.
1
evidenced by the observation in the H NMR spec-
trum of deuterocyclohexane solutions of peroxide I
of signals of unidentified reaction products, probably,
of those with double bonds.
It the photolysis of compound I in C6D12, the frac-
tion of ethynyldimethylsilyl radicals invoved in deute-
rium abstraction from the solvent, leading to alcohol
II formation, decreases from 0.7 from 0.2 as the
temperature is raised from 293 to 333 K. The ratio of
the rate constant of deuterium abtraction from C6D12
(k4) to the overall rate constant (k*) of the conversion
of ethynyldimethylmethoxyl radical by reaction (5)
and oligomerization reactions, calculated as k4/k* =
[II]/([I]0 [I] [II])[C6D12], much decreases as the
photolysis temperature increases (see table). The ratio
k2/k3 (see table) was estimated in the assumption that,
like with CD3OD, the contribution of reaction (5) in
the mechanism of the decomposition of compound I is
insignificant.
1
The H NMR spectra of initial solutions and photo-
lyzates were recorded on a Tesla VS-567A spectro-
meter at 100 MHz.
The yields were determined at a relative error of
about 10%.
The chemical nuclear polarization effects were per-
formed in a modified temperature-controlled NMR
probe. The light of the DRSh-1000 mercury lamp was
focused on an outer end of a quartz light guide and
thus passed to a wall of a rotating quartz ampule [12].
Methanol-d4 solutions of compounds I and III were
illuminated at temperatures from 213 to 313 K and
from 213 to 333 K, respectively, while cyclohexane-
d12 solutions, at 293 and 333 K.
In simulating the decomposition of compound I in
C6D12, the k2 values, like with deuteromethanol, was
set equal the rate constant of (CH3)3CO elimination
Kinetic schemes of photolysis of compounds I in
various solvents were simulated using the KINETICS
(Version 2) program designed for solving the direct
kinetic task by the Gear method [13].
1
(solvent CCl4) (1.2 102 and 2.3 103 s at 293 and
333 K, respectively) [9], and k3
k4. The resulting
kinetic curves of consumption of peroxide I and
accumulation of principal products of the photolysis
in C6D12 fairly fit experimental results at low degress
of decomposition of the starting peroxide.
REFERENCES
1. Antonovskii, B.L., Progr. Khim. Org. Peroksids,
Obzorn. Inf., Moscow: TsNIITENefteKhim, 1992,
nos. 4 5.
2. Voronov, S.A., Kiselyov, E.M., Minko, S.S., Budi-
shevska, O.G., and Roiter, Y.V., J. Polym. Sci.,
Part A: Polym. Chem., 1996, vol. 34, no. 12,
pp. 2507 2511.
Thus, our study showed that compound I decom-
poses primarily from a singlet electronic state. The
chemical nuclear polarization effects and the photo-
lysis mechanism are much contributed by secondary
processes associated with photolysis products and
solvent.
3. Supichenko, G.N., Butovskaya, G.V., Agabekov, V.E.,
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 71 No. 4 2001