esters13 were attributed to the acidic and basic functional
groups on the carbon surface. Conversely, the racemization
of 1,1′-binaphthyl and its derivatives was found to be
catalyzed by the graphitic surface and not by specific
functional groups.14
In general, the coal catalytic activities stem from three
main features: (a) a graphitic structure that is characterized
by a highly porous hydrophobic surface area with a strong
binding affinity toward aromatic molecules; (b) abundance
of various functional groups, mostly containing oxygen,
nitrogen, and sulfur, e.g., carboxylic acids, phenols, amines,
various sulfur functional groups, and heteroaromatic rings;
and (c) electronic conductivity. We reasoned that these
features would render naturally occurring coals effective
catalysts of the Kemp elimination reaction.
the reciprocal of catalyst concentration. From this relationship
site
one can measure the Michaelis Menten parameters
K . Accordingly, we carried out the reaction with variable
M
kcat and
16
amounts of catalyst and used the linear correlation of a
double reciprocal plot (of kobs vs the catalyst weight) in order
site
to estimate the apparent catalytic constant
The apparent K
kcat (Table 1).
M
values in this heterogeneous system could
not be determined in our case because the relationship
between the catalyst weight and the active site concentration
could not be estimated.
As expected for a heterogeneous catalyst, the catalytic
efficiency was found to increase with increased coal surface
1
7
area (Figure 1). Probably a less expected finding is the
Here we show that commercially available coals indeed
catalyze this reaction when mixed with 1 in a buffered
solution and that catalysis originates from specific catalytic
groups and not simply from the large graphitic surface area.
Three German lignites from three major mining areas in
Germany (coals 1613, 1650, and 1551) and three bituminous
coals (RSA, AUS, COL) were examined as potential catalysts
15
of the Kemp elimination reaction. All reactions were carried
out by shaking a mixture of the coal powder and substrate 1
(0.5-2.0 mM) in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4, 0.5 mL)
containing acetonitrile (2% v/v) at 4 °C, and the progress of
the reaction was monitored by HPLC. All coal samples were
shaken in a buffer solution at room temperature for 2 days
to reach equilibrium with solvent before using them as
catalysts.
To compare the catalytic effect of these coal samples, we
carried out a series of reactions using constant amounts of
coal (10 mg) and varying concentrations of substrate 1.
Assuming that under these conditions there was a large
excess of catalytic sites with respect to the substrate, we
expected that the reaction would follow pseudo-first-order
kinetics. Accordingly, we obtained the observed rate con-
stants (kobs) from the linear regression of the experimental
rates as a function of substrate concentration (Table 1).
Figure 1. Dependence of catalytic efficiency on the surface area
of different coals.
apparently linear correlation between the kinetic data and
the carbon content of the catalyst (Figure 2). We found that
coals with decreased abundance of carbon atoms exhibit
(
(
8) Liu, X. C.; Mosbach, K. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1998, 19, 671.
9) Perez-Juste, J.; Hollfelder, F.; Kirby, A. J.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 127.
10) (a) Thorn, S. N.; Daniels, R. Q.; Auditor, M. T. M.; Hilvert, D.
(
Nature 1995, 373, 228. (b) Genre-Grandpierre, A.; Tellier, C.; Loriat, M.-
J.; Blanchard, D.; Hodgson, D. R. W.; Hollfelder, F.; Kirby, A. J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 2497. (c) Sergeeva, M. V.; Tomtova, V.;
Parkinson, A.; Overgaauw, M.; Pomp, P.; Schots, A.; Kirby, A. J.; Hilhorst,
R. Israel J. Chem. 1996, 36, 177.
Table 1. Observed Catalytic Parameters for the Different Coal
Samplesa
coal
kobs (min-1)
sitekcat (min-1
)
(11) Spiro, M. Catal. Today 1990, 7, 167.
(
(
12) Tomita, A.; Tamai, Y. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1971, 36, 153.
13) Yumiko, Y.; Pincock, R. E. J. Can. J. Chem. 1980, 58, 134.
1
1
1
650
551
613
0.0045
0.0041
0.0033
0.0015
0.0014
0.0009
0.82
0.10
(14) (a) Pincock, R. E.; Johnson, W. M.; Wilson, K. R.; Haywood-
Farmer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6477. (b) Pincock, R. E.; Johnson,
W. M.; Haywood-Farmer, J. Can. J. Chem. 1976, 54, 548. (c) Hutchins, L.
G.; Pincock, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2414.
AUS
COL
RSA
0.0016
0.0039
(15) Lignites: coal 1613, source Lower Lusatia, East Germany, open-
cast mine, Nochten; coal 1650, source Central Germany (Halle/Leipzig),
open-cast mine, Profen; coal 1551, source Rhine/Ruhr (Rhenish brown coal),
open-cast mine, Hambach. Bituminous coals: RSA, South Africa, Goodhope
mine, Angloamerican’s coal F-6486; AUS, Stewarton-lilyvale mine, BHP-
Utha coal Ltd.; COL, El Cerrejon mine, Carbocol #4903/0985.
a
The reactions were carried out using a shaker, and the progress of the
reaction was monitored by HPLC equipped with a reverse phase, Supelcosil
C18 column. Calculation of kobs was corrected for the buffer-catalyzed
reaction. Calculation of kcat was carried out according to Klotz. The
correlation coefficients (R ) for the pseudo-first-order rate plots were
between 0.96 and 0.99.
site
16
(16) Suh. J.; Scarpa, I. S.; Klotz, I. M.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
2
7060.
2
(17) Coal: surface area (m /g), elemental analysis: 1613, 91.8, 62.3 (%
C), 0.64 (% N), 24.8 (% O), 4.7 (% H); 1551, 80.2, 64.2 (% C), 0.78 (%
N), 25.2 (% O), 4.5 (% H); 1650, 161.3, 59.9 (% C), 0.52 (% N), 18.5 (%
O), 4.8 (% H); AUS, 5.8, 75.7 (% C), 4.3 (% H), 0.6 (%S); COL, 10.7,
It has been shown that under conditions of excess catalyst
67.5 (% C), 4. 31 (% H), 0.95 (% S); RSA, 3.15, 76.4 (% C), 4.0 (% H),
a linear relationship exists between the reciprocal of kobs and
1.1 (% S).
3748
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 23, 2000