the presently employed system of Ru3(CO)12/LiI are well
matched with those of the reported complex [Ru3(CO)9-
(µ3-I)][N(PPh3)2], albeit missing a bridging carbonyl peak
near 1793 cm-1.9 The IR studies imply that all of the CO’s
from the present combination of Ru3(CO)12 and LiI are
terminal. Although further studies remain to elucidate the
exact structure of the catalytically active species in our case,12
this observation suggests that the main reason for the present
improvement of the reaction conditions by virtue of additives
is probably due to the facile CO ligand dissociation of the
rutheniumcarbonyl cluster upon the addition of halide ions.
Table 2. Hydroesterification of Various Olefinic Substratesa
In addition, when we treated a solution of Ru3(CO)12 and
2-pyridylmethyl formate (1) in DMF-d7 with tetrabutylam-
1
monium iodide (2) at 70 °C, it was observed by H NMR
that two peaks appeared gradually at -12.5 and -15.7 ppm,
which are assignable to ruthenium hydride presumably
generated by an oxidative addtion of formyl C-H bond of
1 with ruthenium metal.13 Interestingly, the intensity of the
peaks was maintained without much diminution even after
12 h, suggesting that the presence of halides may also help
increase the half-life of the emerging rutheniumcarbonyl
hydride species, which subsequently insert into the unsatur-
ated C-C bonds.4
The halide additive effects turned out to be general, and
a wide range of alkenes were efficiently converted to the
corresponding one-carbon elongated esters under the opti-
mized conditions (Table 2). The additive effects are often
moderate with highly reactive alkenes such as terminal or
strained internal olefins. With those olefins, excellent product
yileds could be obtained even when only 1.2 equiv of
substrates were employed by virtue of Bu4NI salt (2) (entries
1-10).
(7) Lavigne and co-workers showed that preformed ruthenium carbonyl
halide species [N(PPh3)2]2[Ru3(µ-Cl)2(CO)11] could be used as a good
catalyst precursor in the hydroesterification of ethylene using methyl formate
at 160 °C: (a) Lavigne, G.; Lugan, N.; Kalck, P.; Soulie´, J. M.; Lerouge,
O.; Saillard, J. Y.; Halet, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10669-10670.
(b) Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G.; Soulie´, J. M.; Fabre, S.; Kalck, P.; Saillard, J.
Y.; Halet, J. F. Organometallics 1995, 14, 1712-1731.
(8) For selected examples of NH4PF6 additive effects in Ru3(CO)12
catalysis, see: (a) Tokunaga, M.; Eckert, M.; Wakatsuki, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3222-3225. (b) Shimada, T.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 6646-6647. (c) Yi, C. S.; Yun, S. Y.; Guzei, I. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5782-5783.
(9) (a) Han, S.-H.; Geoffroy, G. L.; Dombek, B. D.; Rheingold, A. L.
Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 4355-4361. (b) Rivomanana. S.; Lavigne. G.;
Lugan, N.; Bonnet. J.-J. Organometalllics 1991, 10, 2285-2297.
(10) (a) Bor, G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 543-552. (b) Koelliker,
R.; Bor, G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 417, 439-451.
a Olefin (0.48 mmol in entries 1-10 and 1.2 mmol in entries 11-22), 1
(0.4 mmol), and 2 (15 mol %) in the indicated solvent (0.2 mL). b Isolated
yield and ratio of linear/branced isomer of crude mixture. c Only exo-product
was generated. d An equal mixture of two diastereomers. e Ratio of R- to
â-ester. f Ratio of 1- to 2-carboxylate.
(11) See the Supporting Information for details.
(12) Several additional examples have been reported on the halide
promotion effects in Ru3(CO)12-catalyzed reactions. Hydrogenation of
carbon dioxide: (a) Tominaga, K.-i.; Sasaki, Y. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
2004, 220, 159-165. Oxonation of olefins: (b) Knifton, J. F. J. Mol. Catal.
1988, 47, 99-116. Alkoxycarbonylation: (c) Hidai, M.; Koyasu, Y.;
Chikanari, K.; Uchida, Y. J. Mol. Catal. 1987, 40, 243-254. Hydroformy-
lation of olefins with CO2: (d) Keister, J. B.; Gentile, R. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1981, 222, 143-153. Homologation of methyl formate: (e) Ragaini,
F.; Cenini, S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 161, 31-38. Reductive
carbonylation of aromatic nitro compounds: (f) Pizzotti, M.; Cenini, S.;
Quici, S.; Tollari, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1994, 913-917.
(13) (a) Ayllon, J. A.; Sayers, S. F.; Sabo-Etienne, S.; Donnadieu, B.;
Chaudret, B.; Clot, E. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3981-3990. (b) Grumbine,
S. K.; Mitchell, G. P.; Straus, D. A.; Tilley, T. D.; Rheingold, A. L.
Organometallics 1998, 17, 5607-5619. (c) Na, Y.; Chang, S. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 1887-1889. (d) Lee, M.; Ko, S.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 12011-12012.
The regioselectivity for the formation of linear to branched
isomeric ester was not noticeably changed by the presence
of halide additives (entries 3, 4 and 7, 8), suggesting that
the main catalytic cycle is not altered by the promoter.4
Moreover, the nature of halide ions does not seem to have
much influence on the regioselectivity of the reaction. For
example, when less effective LiCl or LiBr was employed as
an additive in the reaction of 1-hexene, the regioselectivity
of the linear/branched products was observed to be 3.7:1 and
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 19, 2006
4357