Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
nm, which was attributed to 1·DMAP. In contrast, the use of the
weaker Lewis basic 3-fluoropyridine (PyF) resulted in an almost
unchanged fluorescence spectrum of 1, even when an excess of
PyF was added after the absorption band of 1 had completely
changed into a new band of the 1·PyF adduct. The binding
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was partly supported by CREST, JST, and a Grant-in-
Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area (Stimuli-
responsive Chemical Species, no. 24109007) from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT)
of Japan. K.M. thanks the JSPS for a Research Fellowship for
Young Scientists.
2
−1
constant of 1 toward PyF was determined to be 1.6 × 10 M
(
Figure S14). These results demonstrate that the photo-
dissociation behavior of these systems strongly depends on the
Lewis basicity of the additive. The observed dual emission of 1·
pyridine is based on the delicate balance between the Lewis
acidity of 1 and the Lewis basicity of the pyridine derivatives.
A highly relevant question in this context is how the Lewis
basicity of the additive affects the behavior in the excited state. In
order to shed some light on this question, DFT calculations at the
B3LYP/6-31G(d) level were carried out for 1·pyridine, 1·
DMAP, and 1·PyF. The HOMOs of these compounds are
comparable and are mainly localized on the benzofluoranthene
moiety. The LUMOs of these compounds, on the other hand, are
distinctly different. While the LUMO of 1·DMAP is delocalized
over the three naphthalene moieties, both 1·pyridine and 1·PyF
exhibit LUMOs localized on the pyridine moieties (Figure S27).
REFERENCES
■
(1) For reviews, see: (a) Entwistle, C. D.; Marder, T. B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2927. (b) Entwistle, C. D.; Marder, T. B. Chem. Mater.
2
004, 16, 4574. (c) Yamaguchi, S.; Wakamiya, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006,
7
8, 1413. (d) Bosdet, M. J. D.; Piers, W. E. Can. J. Chem. 2008, 86, 8.
(
e) Jak
Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 7805.
2) For reviews, see: (a) Loudet, A.; Burgess, K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
̈
le, F. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3985. (f) Hudson, Z. M.; Wang, S.
(
4
2
891. (b) Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
008, 47, 1184. (c) Rao, Y.-L.; Wang, S. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 12263.
(d) Frath, D.; Massue, J.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
As a result, significantly different S characters are observed.
2014, 53, 2290.
1
Based on TD-DFT calculations at the same level of theory, the S1
of 1·DMAP has a π−π* transition character, and therefore the
photoexcitation does not affect the bonding nature of the
pyridine−boron moiety. In contrast, 1·pyridine and 1·PyF
exhibit an intramolecular charge transfer character from the
(3) (a) Rao, Y.-L.; Amarne, H.; Zhao, S.-B.; McCormick, T. M.; Martic,
S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.-Y.; Wang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12898.
b) Baik, C.; Hudson, Z. M.; Amarne, H.; Wang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
009, 131, 14549. (c) Rao, Y.-L.; Amarne, H.; Wang, S. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 2012, 256, 759. (d) Rao, Y.-L.; Chen, L. D.; Mosey, N. J.; Wang, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11026. (e) Nagura, K.; Saito, S.; Frohlich, R.;
Glorius, F.; Yamaguchi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7762.
f) Kropp, M.; Bhamidapaty, K.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
́
(
2
̈
benzofluoranthene moiety into the pyridine moiety in S . This
1
difference should be responsible for the characteristic behavior in
the excited state. However, the optimized structure of 1·pyridine
(
110, 6252.
in S obtained from the TD-DFT calculation at the B3LYP/6-
(4) Ansorg, K.; Braunschweig, H.; Chiu, C.-W.; Engels, D.; Gamon, D.;
1
31G(d) level suggests a much shorter B−N bond (1.592 Å)
Hu
5) Weiner, B. R.; Pasternack, L.; Nelson, H. H.; Prather, K. A.;
Rosenfeld, R. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 4138.
6) For reviews, see: (a) Bertelson, R. C. Photochromism. In
̈
gel, M.; Kupfer, T.; Radacki, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2833.
(
compared to the ground state (1.737 Å; Figures S23 and S31).
This structural feature is apparently inconsistent with the
photodissociation reactivity. How the borane−pyridine Lewis
adducts actually undergo the photoinduced dissociation still
remains to be determined.
(
Techniques of Chemistry; Brown, G. H., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1971; Vol. 3. (b) Das, P. K. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 119. (c) Duxbury,
D. F. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 381.
In summary, we have synthesized a partially fused trinaph-
thylborane 1. The small structural constraint imparts high Lewis
acidity to the planarized triarylborane skeleton, while the
remarkable stability toward water and oxygen is maintained.
Consequently, the molecule can easily form Lewis adducts in
solution, even with weakly Lewis basic pyridine derivatives.
Importantly, these B−N Lewis adducts undergo unprecedented
photodissociation in the excited state, resulting in a dual emission
that covers a broad range of the visible light (480−700 nm). The
photoinduced B−N bond cleavage and the regeneration of the
highly stable boron-embedded π systems should have great
potential as a basis for various functions, such as photochromism,
organocatalysis, and photoresponsive supramolecular assem-
(
7) (a) Zhou, Z.; Wakamiya, A.; Kushida, T.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4529. (b) Kushida, T.; Camacho, C.; Shuto, A.;
Irle, S.; Muramatsu, M.; Katayama, T.; Ito, S.; Nagasawa, Y.; Miyasaka,
H.; Sakuda, E.; Kitamura, N.; Zhou, Z.; Wakamiya, A.; Yamaguchi, S.
Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1296.
(
8) (a) Saito, S.; Matsuo, K.; Yamaguchi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
130. (b) Dou, C.; Saito, S.; Matsuo, K.; Hisaki, I.; Yamaguchi, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12206.
9) (a) Bowman, W. R.; Heaney, H.; Jordan, B. M. Tetrahedron 1991,
9
(
4
7, 10119. (b) Harrowven, D. C.; Sutton, B. J.; Coulton, S. Tetrahedron
2
002, 58, 3387. (c) Majumdar, K. C.; Basu, P. K.; Chattopadhyay, S. K.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 793 and references therein.
(10) (a) Zettler, F.; Hausen, H. D.; Hess, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974,
72, 157. (b) Blount, J. F.; Finocchiaro, P.; Gust, D.; Mislow, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7019. (c) Olmstead, M. M.; Power, P. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4235.
1
4
bly. Further studies exploring these possibilities are currently
undertaken in our laboratory.
(
11) Wehmschulte, R. J.; Khan, M. A.; Twamley, B.; Schiemenz, B.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 844.
12) Geier, S. J.; Gille, A. L.; Gilbert, T. M.; Stephan, D. W. Inorg. Chem.
009, 48, 10466.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(
2
■
*
S
Supporting Information
(13) Wan, P.; Yates, K.; Boyd, M. K. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 2881.
(14) (a) Irie, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2078. (b) Kimura, K.;
Mizutani, R.; Yokoyama, M.; Arakawa, R.; Sakurai, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
000, 122, 5448. (c) Liu, H.; Xu, Y.; Li, F.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Song, Y.;
Liu, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2515. (d) Wang, B. C.; Chen, Q.;
Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2553.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
D
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja506980p | J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX