Preparation of 10-Trifluoromethyl Artemether and Artesunate
TABLE 1. Sta bility of 4 in Differ en t Solven ts a t Room
Tem p er a tu r e
TABLE 2. Su bstitu tion of Br om id e 4 w ith Va r iou s
Nu cleop h iles
DMSO
DMF
CH3CN
hexane
CH2Cl2
MeOHb
solvent 1 h 8 h 1 h 8 h 1 h 8 h 1 h 8 h 1 h 8 h 1 h 8 h
4 (%)a
7 (%)a
41
4
68 45 91 77 >95 >95 >95 >95 14
0
59 96 32 55
9
23
<5 <5 <5 <5 16 23
a
b
19F NMR ratio. 5a R and 5a â are the other products obtained.
The 5a R/5a â ratio was the same, 17/83, at 1 and 8 h.
nucleophile
compd
yielda (%)
olefin 7b (%)
glycal 7. Conversely, it was stable in low or nonpolar ones
such as CH2Cl2 or hexane (no elimination was observed
in 19F NMR after 8 h).
H2O
6
87
79
76
76b
73
89
46
83
68
12
5
6
6
5
2
12
0
MeOH
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
5g
5h
EtOH
Surprisingly, in MeOH the reaction was complete in
less than 2 h, and substitution compound 5a was the
major product accompanied with only 23% of glycal 7.
5a was obtained in a 17/83 ratio of R and â isomers.
The conclusion of these experiments on solvent effects
is that the nucleophilic substitution of bromide 4 can
occur without silver electrophilic assistance when using
methanol as solvent. The diastereoisomer â was also
predominantly formed (de ) 66%) and a non negligible
amount of elimination product was obtained. Addition
of triethylamine or dimethylaminonaphthalin as proton
sponge did not change the substitution/elimination ratio.
Other alcohols such as ethanol or allylic alcohol used as
solvents also allowed the substitution of 4. It is postulated
that in these cases the solvent is able to activate bromine
through a hydrogen bond (RMeOH ) 0.98).11 Such a process,
more or less concerted, could explain the low ratio of
elimination and the better diastereoselection. However,
unlike an SN2 process, the substitution of 4 with MeOH
occurred mainly with retention of configuration, similarly
to an SNi process usually observed when the nucleophiles
also play a role of activator (route b, Scheme 3).12,13 The
second point that this study highlighted, is that CH2Cl2
appears to be a solvent of choice for studying the
substitution of 4 because no elimination was observed
after 8 h and it solubilizes starting material better than
hexane.
Bromide 4 was thus placed in CH2Cl2 with 10 equiv of
MeOH at room temperature. The substitution reaction
was slowed (72% conversion after 15 h). Nevertheless, it
is interesting to note that the diastereoselection was
improved (5a R/5a â ) 8:92) compared to the reaction
performed with MeOH as solvent (5a R/5a â ) 17:83).
Moreover, under these conditions the elimination process
into glycal 7 could be reduced to 3%.
With the hypothesis that the slower reaction rate was
due to the weaker activation process of bromide 4 by
MeOH as represented in Scheme 3, we thought to
reinforce this activation using a stronger hydrogen bond
donor but less electrophilic than a silver salt. A good
candidate was 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP),
which possesses a low nucleophilicity, a high ionizing
power, and a high hydrogen bond donor ability (R )
1.96).11 All these properties contribute to modify the
4-(MeO2C)C6H4CH2OH
CH2dCHCH2OH
HOCH2CH2OH
c
CF3CH2OH
H2O2 (UHP)d
HO2C(CH2)2CO2Hd,e
5
Isolated yield. b NMR ratio of the crude. c Used as solvent, and
a
with addition of Et3N. In a mixture 1:1 CH2Cl2/HFIP. e In the
d
presence of 5 equiv of Et3N.
course and the rate of solvolysis reactions when HFIP is
used as solvent.14 They have also been exploited in
various other reactions, such as hydrogen peroxide
activation, oxirane ring opening,15 Nazarov cyclization,16
or Michael reaction.17
Experiments under various conditions using different
ratios of HFIP/MeOH or HFIP/CH2Cl2/MeOH allowed
selecting the following best conditions for the reaction of
4 with MeOH: 10 equiv of MeOH and 5 equiv of HFIP
in a dichloromethane solution at room temperature.
Under these conditions, the reaction was complete in less
than 5 h, instead of more than 1 day without HFIP.
Moreover, the reaction was still chemoselective, with only
5% of glycal 7 formed, and stereoselective: the R stere-
oisomer was not detected in NMR. However, an excess
of nucleophile was still required for the reaction. When
the nucleophile was used in stoichiometric amount,
degradation of the starting material was observed.
These conditions have been applied to other nucleo-
philes in order to obtain artemisinin derivatives with
better solubility in either oil or water. Treatment of 4
with various alcohols in the presence of HFIP gave 5a -e
in good isolated yields ranging from 73 to 89% (Table 2).
They were accompanied with a small amount of glycal 7
(2-6%). When products could not be separated from
glycal 7 by chromatography because of their close polarity
(5a and 5b), 7 was oxidized into a polar diol with RuO4
generated in situ from RuCl3 and NaIO4. After substitu-
tion of 4 with methyl 4-(hydroxymethyl)benzoate, a fast
purification on silica gel allowed the recycling of the
excess of reagent (90% were recovered). The product 5c
was then hydrolyzed under basic conditions to afford the
corresponding carboxylic acid 5c′ in 53% yield from 4.
(14) See, for example: (a) Allard, B.; Casadevall, A.; Casadevall, E.;
Largeau, C. Nouv. J . Chim. 1980, 4, 539-545. (b) Schadt, F. L.;
Bentley, D. W.; Schleyer, P. V. R. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 7667.
(15) Iskra, J .; Bonnet-Delpon, D., Be´gue´, J . P. Eur. J . Org. Chem.
2002, 3402-3410.
(11) (a) Reichadt, C. Solvents and solvent effects in organic chemistry,
3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003. (b) Kamlet, M. J .; Abboud, J .-
L. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2877.
(12) Haynes, R. K.; Chan, H. W.; Cheug, M. K.; Chung, S. T.; Lam,
W. L.; Tsang, H. W.; Voerste, A.; Williams, I. D. Eur. J . Org. Chem.
2003, 2098-2114.
(16) Ichikawa, J .; Miyazaki, S.; Fujiwara, M.; Minami, T. J . Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 2320-2321.
(13) Be´gue´, J . P.; Benayoud, F.; Bonnet-Delpon, D. J . Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 5029-5036.
(17) Takita, R.; Oshima, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 4661-4665.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 25, 2003 9765