M. El Faydy et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 219 (2016) 396–404
397
Fig. 1. Synthesis of 5-chloromethyl-8-hydroxyquinoline hydrochloride (Cl-QH).
The H NMR, 13C NMR, IR and mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) (Table 1)
were used to characterize and confirm the obtained product structure
(Supplementary data).
1
dipole momentum (μ) and total energy (TE) were obtained by DFT at
the B3LYP/6–31G* level of theory, help to understand the adsorption
properties by considering the structure of 5-(chloromethyl)-8-
quinolinol hydrochloride.
2.2. Weight loss measurements
2
. Experimental details
Weight loss measurements were carried out in glass beakers con-
taining 500 mL solution without and with different inhibitor concentra-
tions in 1 M HCl solution. The temperature of the solutions was held at
2
.1. Materials
298 K by a thermostat water bath. After 6 h of immersion in the acid so-
Steel XC38 containing in wt.%: 0, 37 C, 0.23 Si, 0.68 Mn, 0016 S, 0077
lutions in air without bubbling, the samples were taken out and were
−
4
Cr, 0011 Ti, 0059 Ni, 0009 Co, 0.16 Cu, and balance iron was used for
weight-loss and electrochemical tests. For weight loss measurements,
the rectangular coupons with the size of 5 cm × 1 cm × 0.1 cm were
used. A columned XC38 steel specimen, embedded in Teflon holder
cleaned carefully according to ASTM G-81 and reweighed to 10
g
for determining corrosion rate [22]. The inhibition efficiency is defined
as follows:
2
ω −ω
ω0
using epoxy resin with an exposed area of 1 cm , was used as the
0
ηω
¼
ꢀ 100
ð1Þ
working electrode for electrochemical measurements. The coupons and
electrodes were abraded with emery paper (up to 1200 grit), cleaned
with acetone and washed with distillated water, and finally dried at hot
air before being immersed in the acid solution. The aggressive solution
was prepared by dilution of an analytical grade HCl solution (37%) with
0
where ω and ω are the values of corrosion weight loss after immersion
in solution without and with inhibitor, respectively.
−
6
2.3. Electrochemical methods
distilled water. The concentration of inhibitors was ranged from 10
to 10 M. All assessments were carried out at temperature 298 K.
−
3
A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as a reference elec-
trode and all potentials were given with it. The counter electrode was
a platinum plate of large surface area.
For the synthesis of 5-Chloromethyl-8-hydroxyquinoline hydrochlo-
ride (Cl-QH), all chemicals were purchased from Aldrich or Acros
(
France). The melting points were determined on an automatic electro-
1
In addition, the working electrode was immersed in the test solution
during half an hour until a steady state open circuit potential (Eocp) was
obtained. The steady-state polarization curves were recorded
potentiodynamically using a VoltaLab PGZ 100 and controlled by a
personal computer. The cathodic polarization curve was recorded by
polarization from Eocp to negative direction under potentiodynamic
thermal IA 9200 digital. The H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker
00 WB spectrometer at 300 MHz for solutions in Me SO-d . The chem-
3
2
6
ical shifts are given as δ values with reference to tetramethylsilane (TMS)
as internal standard and the infrared spectra were recorded from
−
1
−1
4
00 cm to 4000 cm on a Bruker IFS 66v Fourier transform spectrom-
eter using KBr pellets. The mass spectrum was recorded on THERMO
Electron DSQ II.
−
1
conditions corresponding to 1 mV s
(sweep rate) and under air
atmosphere. After this scan, the anodic polarization curve was recorded
by polarization from Eocp to positive direction under the same condi-
tions as said before. To evaluate corrosion kinetic parameters, a fitting
by Stern-Geary equation was used. To do so, the overall current density
values, i, were considered as the sum of two contributions, anodic and
So, the Cl-QH was synthesized according to the method described by
Fen et al. [21], which consists of the reaction of 8-hydroxyquinoline
with formaldehyde and concentrated HCl solution (Fig. 1).
Thus, a mixture of 10.0 g (0.068 mol) of 8-hydroxyquinoline, 11 ml
of concentrated hydrochloric acid, and 11 ml (0.397 mol) of 37% form-
aldehyde was treated with hydrogen chloride gas and stirred for 6 h.
The solution was allowed to stand at room temperature for 2 h without
stirring. The obtained yellow solid was collected on a filter, washed with
acetone, and dried under vacuum to afford 5-chloromethyl-8-
hydroxyquinoline hydrochloride (Cl-QH) (9.8 g, 98%) without further
a c
cathodic current i and i , respectively. For the potential domain not
too far from the open circuit potential, it may be considered that both
processes followed the Tafel law [23]. Thus, it can be derived from
Eq. (2):
i ¼ ia þ ic ¼ icorrf exp½ba ꢀ ðE−EcorrÞꢁ− exp½bc ꢀ ðE−EcorrÞꢁg
ð2Þ
f
purification, m.p.: 282 °C, R Value: 0.52 (n-hexane/acetone: 4/6).
Table 1
Spectral data of the synthesized compound.
Spectral data
IR (KBr, cm− ): 1600 (C = C quinoline), 2850–3000 (C-H quinoline), 3457 (O-H bonded), 1470–1490 (−CH
1
2
-).
1
H NMR (300 MHz, D
2
O-d
O-d
ESI-MS (m/z): 231 (75%), 195 (100%) (M ).
2
), δppm = 9.156–9.477 (s, 1H, quinoline-OH), 7.521–8.315 (m, 5H, quinoline), 5.030–5.267 (s, 2H, CH
2
-Cl).
1
3
C NMR (300 MHz, D
2
2
), δppm = 60.741 (quinoline-CH -Cl), 116.465, 122.356, 130.968, 142.800, 144.153(CH-quinoline); 128.863, 130.908, 144.237, 147.623 (C-quinoline).
2
+
1