M. Bressan et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 593–594 (2000) 416–420
417
2
. Experimental
A Sciex API 365 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer
was used to obtain ESI-mass spectra. Instrument con-
trol and data acquisition were performed with a Macin-
tosh System 7600/132 using MASSCHROM 1.0 software.
Calibration was carried out using polypropylene glycol
and the resolution was set in the range 0.6–0.9 amu.
Analyses were performed by direct infusion of aqueous
solution of the sample containing ammonium formate
50 mM (or formic acid 1%, ammonia 50 mM or NaOH
50 mM), which was delivered by a model 11 syringe
2.1. Preparation of RuPcS
RuPcS was prepared by template synthesis starting
from RuCl ·3H O, sodium 4-sulfophthalate and urea,
3
2
following the early general procedures for the synthesis
of metal-sulfophthalocyanines [7]. The deep-green com-
pound was isolated in the solid by salting out the
aqueous reaction mixtures with concentrated NaCl.
−
1
pump at the flow rate of 5 ml min . The infusion
pump was connected to a Sciex ion-spray interface
through a 1 m fused silica capillary (0.75 mm i.d.). Q1
scan mass spectra were acquired with a mass range
200–2000 amu using a step size of 0.1 amu and a dwell
time of 0.250 ms. The nebulizer gas (air) and the
1
5
The NꢀRuPcS derivative was similarly prepared,
1
5
starting from commercially available Nꢀurea (]99%
isotopic purity, Isotec). Anal. Found: C, 35.41; H, 1.64;
N, 10.64; S, 11.85%. Anal. Calc. for RuPcS·3H O,
RuC H N O S Na : C, 35.72; H, 1.68; N, 10.41; S,
1
2
3
2
18
8
15
4
4
−
1
1.92%. Electronic spectra (400–1500 nm, in water):
curtain gas (N ) flows were set at 1.8 l and 2.4 l min
,
2
6
30 nm (m , 25 000). Magnetic susceptibility, 20°C.
respectively. The ionization voltage was set at +4600
V, and the orifice and ring potentials were set at +75
and +280 V, respectively. In product ion scan experi-
ments, spectra were acquired with a mass range of
30–1200 amu using a step size of 0.1 amu and a dwell
time of 0.500 ms. The collision-activated dissociation
M
−
6
g= −0.25×10
in 4:1 water–D O solutions (20 mM), no detectable
shift of the indicator compound (tert-butyl alcohol) was
measured, following Evans method [8].
emu (solid state, Gouy’s method);
2
The catalytic reactions were typically carried out at
2
0°C in a 5 ml vial, by stirring magnetically 2 ml of an
(CAD) gas pressure (N ) was maintained at 2.84×
2
−
3
aqueous solution containing the catalyst (RuPcS, 0.2
10
torr.
mM) and the oxidant (H O , 2 N), to which 50 ml of the
2
2
chlorinated substrate were added, either as neat, to give
a saturated aqueous solution, or, alternatively, dis-
solved in 2 ml of an organic solvent (hexane, chloro-
form), to perform the reactions in a double phase
system. Chloride ions were analyzed spectrophotometri-
cally by the mercury thiocyanate method. Carbon diox-
ide and carbon monoxide analyses were made by
passing a moderate flow of nitrogen through the reac-
tion mixtures, previously acidified with H SO 1 N,
3. Results
To our knowledge RuPcS is the first water-soluble
phthalocyanine derivative of ruthenium so far reported,
whereas variously substituted ruthenium-phthalocya-
nines are known, both with Ru(II) and Ru(III) [10].
The vis–NIR spectra (400–1500 nm) of RuPcS in
water only show the diagnostic Q band at 630 nm,
arising from the pp* transition within the heteroaro-
matic ring; the spectra are insensitive to the acidity of
the media in the 1–13 pH range. The complex is
attributed a monomeric structure on the basis of the
ESI-mass spectra (positive patterns: in all examined
cases no results were obtained with negative patterns),
which exhibit six complex signals of various intensities,
each showing the isotopic pattern of ruthenium diag-
nostic for a monomeric form and spaced by 22 amu
2
4
which was captured first by aqueous Ba(OH) 0.1 M
2
and finally by a dichloromethane solution of the violet
RuCl(DPP) ]PF complex (10 mM). Aliquots from the
2
6
filtered Ba(OH) solution were back-titrated with HCl
2
0
.1 N for CO , whereas the dichloromethane solutions
2
were spectrophotometrically analyzed for the formation
of the colorless mono-carbonyl adduct (w at 1930
CO
−
1
cm ) [9].
Organic analyses were performed on a HP 6890 GLC
instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector
(AWNa−AW ), corresponding to the RuPcS molecu-
H
(
FID), using a 30 m HP-5 capillary columns (0.32 mm
lar ion in the form of the penta-protonated tetra-sul-
fonic acid and the tetra-protonated mono-, the
tri-protonated di-, the di-protonated tri-, the mono-pro-
tonated tetra- and the penta-sodium sulfonate ions,
i.d.; 0.25 film thick) with the injection port thermostat-
ted at 250°C (carrier gas: He) on aliquots withdrawn
with a microsyringe from the aqueous reaction mixtures
either as such or diluted 1:10 with acetone. The reaction
mixtures were also treated by standard procedures with
a 10:1 excess 2-methyl-1-butanol to analyze the possibly
formed dicarboxylic acids as their isobutyl-esters. NMR
spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz,
IR spectra on a Bio-Rad FTS-7 PC and vis–NIR
spectra on a Cary instrument.
15
respectively (Fig. 2). Mass spectra of the N-enriched
RuPcS compound again show the diagnostic six signals
only shifted to higher molecular weight by 8 amu. No
14
evidence for NꢀRuPcS is detected, thus indicating a
isotopic enrichment close to 100%. The compound is
diamagnetic both in the solid state and in aqueous
6
solution (see Section 2), as expected for a d metal ion