10.1002/anie.202104153
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
RESEARCH ARTICLE
systems for methane-oxidation. The latter operate aerobically
with a NADH electron carrier and are characterized by a highly
designed by systematically addressing the limitations of
conventional systems. The use of a fluorous co-solvent as an acid
diluent brought several advantages, notably a milder reaction
environment that benefited working in a heterogeneous mode and
a facile product and solvent recovery method through a highly-
effective extraction with a non-fluorous solvent. The performance
of this cobalt-catalyzed process far exceeds other comparable
heterogeneous transition metal-based high-temperature catalytic
processes, which are generally restricted by much lower methane
conversion and product selectivity. Through future work to
elucidate the reaction mechanisms, target improvement of the
cobalt utilization at high metal loadings, and optimization of
process conditions, this novel catalytic approach holds the
promise of significant future improvement.
selective conversion of methane to methanol[26]
.
It is clear that high-temperature heterogeneous catalytic
approaches using different transition metals typically result in
much a poorer selectivity even at lower conversion, and
consequently, these systems appear on the very left in Figure 3a.
The performance of the Co/SiO2-IWI catalyst is distinct from these
other approaches and advances toward the more efficient bio-
enzymatic systems. Furthermore, methanol productivity achieved
per gram of the cobalt catalyst is of the same order as that
achieved per gram of dry / wet cells in the biological conversion
of methane. With the Co/SiO2-IWI catalyst, a productivity up to
0.03 kgmethanol/kgcat•h was attained at low cobalt loadings under
low-pressure conditions and a pronounced enhancement is
expected on increasing the feed pressure further. The volumetric
productivity, or space-time-yield (STY), is an additional metric
useful for comparing processes. Although optimization of this
parameter was not a focus of this work, volumetric productivity in
this case would likely be greatly enhanced through increasing the
amount of catalyst in the reactor, increasing methane partial
pressures, and targeting the retention of efficient cobalt utilization
at higher weight loadings.
In addition to excellent oxygen-based product yields,
working at lower partial pressure of methane showed improved
selective methane conversion to the methyl ester. Reactions
performed with 2.5% methane feed resulted in methane-based
ester yields of up to 17% (Supporting Information, Table S4).
While the transition metal-based catalysts depicted in Figure 3b
reach 2 - 3% methane-based yields at best, biological systems
consistently report yields close to 30%[26]. The high activity of
MMO enzymes coupled with the high selectivity in methane
conversion and oxygen utilization has proved difficult to replicate
in heterogeneous systems. The high activity of the cobalt-based
catalyst along with the use of esterification as a ‘product
protection’ strategy enables a performance that is comparable to
the bio-enzymatic systems.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially by ETH Zurich and the Swiss
National Science Foundation (Grant No. 200021_178943). The
authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Frank Krumeich at
ETH Zurich for his work in acquiring the electron microscopy
images presented in this work, Prof. Christophe Copéret for
helpful discussions, and Dr. Adam Clark at the Swiss Light Source
for his expertise and support in acquiring the XAS data, as well as
the SuperXAS beamline for the provision of measurement time.
Keywords: Heterogeneous Catalysis • Methyl Ester • Cobalt •
Product Protection • Fluorous Solvents
[1]
[2]
IEA, IEA, Paris, 2019.
aJ. P. Lange, Catal Today 2001, 64, 3-8; bC. Hammond, S.
Conrad, I. Hermans, Chemsuschem 2012, 5, 1668-1686; cM. Blug,
J. Leker, L. Plass, A. Günther, in Methanol: The Basic Chemical
and Energy Feedstock of the Future: Asinger's Vision Today (Eds.:
M. Bertau, H. Offermanns, L. Plass, F. Schmidt, H.-J. Wernicke),
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014, pp. 603-618;
dA. I. Olivos-Suarez, A. Szecsenyi, E. J. M. Hensen, J. Ruiz-
Martinez, E. A. Pidko, J. Gascon, Acs Catal 2016, 6, 2965-2981.
aJ. R. Rostrup-Nielsen, J. Sehested, J. K. Norskov, Adv Catal
2002, 47, 65-139; bP. Tang, Q. J. Zhu, Z. X. Wu, D. Ma, Energ
Environ Sci 2014, 7, 2580-2591; cI. Dybkjaer, K. Aasberg-
Petersen, Can J Chem Eng 2016, 94, 607-612.
aJ. P. Lange, Ind Eng Chem Res 1997, 36, 4282-4290; bS.
Mokhatab, J. Mak, J. V. Valappil, D. A. Wood, Handbook of
liquefied natural gas, First edition. ed., Elsevier, GPP, Amsterdam,
2014; cW. Taifan, J. Baltrusaitis, Appl Catal B-Environ 2016, 198,
525-547.
Table 1 lists the activity of the Co/SiO2-IWI catalyst with
known homogeneous catalytic systems that oxidize methane to
methyl trifluoroacetate. The performance of these systems is
compared on the basis of the reported turnovers (TO) over the
reaction period and the productivity. We note that the turnovers
reported typically represent a lower bound on the amount of
product formed per mole of catalyst, since in most cases it
appears that the catalyst may not be fully deactivated at the end
of the reaction period. The Co/SiO2-IWI catalyst achieved
turnovers of up to 31 and a corresponding productivity of 10.3
[3]
[4]
[5]
aB. G. Hashiguchi, M. M. Konnick, S. M. Bischof, S. J. Gustafson,
D. Devarajan, N. Gunsalus, D. H. Ess, R. A. Periana, Science
2014, 343, 1232-1237; bV. L. Sushkevich, D. Palagin, M.
Ranocchiari, J. A. van Bokhoven, Science 2017, 356, 523-+; cJ.
Shan, M. Li, L. F. Allard, S. Lee, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos,
Nature 2017, 551, 605-608; dM. Ravi, M. Ranocchiari, J. A. van
Bokhoven, Angew Chem Int Edit 2017, 56, 16464-16483; eJ. Xie,
R. Jin, A. Li, Y. Bi, Q. Ruan, Y. Deng, Y. Zhang, S. Yao, G.
Sankar, D. Ma, J. Tang, Nature Catalysis 2018, 1, 889-896; fV.
Paunović, P. Hemberger, A. Bodi, N. López, J. Pérez-Ramírez,
Nature Catalysis 2018, 1, 363-370; gH. J. Kim, J. Huh, Y. W.
Kwon, D. Park, Y. Yu, Y. E. Jang, B.-R. Lee, E. Jo, E. J. Lee, Y.
Heo, W. Lee, J. Lee, Nature Catalysis 2019, 2, 342-353; hM. O.
Ross, F. MacMillan, J. Wang, A. Nisthal, T. J. Lawton, B. D.
Olafson, S. L. Mayo, A. C. Rosenzweig, B. M. Hoffman, Science
2019, 364, 566; iY. Zhou, L. Zhang, W. Wang, Nature
-1
molester molCo h-1. This performance is competitive to even
homogeneous systems that employ stronger oxidants (K2S2O8,
H2O2), higher partial pressures of methane, and/or more complex
redox cycling schemes. Taken together, Figure 3 and Table 1
illustrate the outstanding catalytic performance of the system that
is achieved with an economical oxidant and under reaction
conditions that are more favorable than those generally employed
in state-of-the-art methane-to-methyl-ester systems.
Communications 2019, 10, 506; jC. Díaz-Urrutia, T. Ott, Science
2019, 363, 1326; kZ. Jin, L. Wang, E. Zuidema, K. Mondal, M.
Zhang, J. Zhang, C. Wang, X. Meng, H. Yang, C. Mesters, F.-S.
Xiao, Science 2020, 367, 193; lS. Bai, F. Liu, B. Huang, F. Li, H.
Lin, T. Wu, M. Sun, J. Wu, Q. Shao, Y. Xu, X. Huang, Nature
Communications 2020, 11, 954.
aT. Kobayashi, N. Guilhaume, J. Miki, N. Kitamura, M. Haruta,
Catal Today 1996, 32, 171-175; bR. L. McCormick, G. O. Alptekin,
Catal Today 2000, 55, 269-280; cC.-B. Wang, R. G. Herman, C.
Conclusion
An improved methane-to-methyl ester process with competitive
performance for the selective conversion of methane was
[6]
5
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.