Analyses of Infrared Absorption Bands of 15NO3
J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 114, No. 2, 2010 985
average angular momentum induced by the degenerate
vibrational mode, ν3. However, they had to assume a quite
large value 2440 cm-1 for the second-order vibronic matrix
element. This finding indicates that the mechanism they
proposed is by no means a dominant one. On the other hand,
Kawaguchi et al.10 examined the effect of anharmonicity
resonance between ν3 and ν1 + ν4 on the first-order Coriolis
coupling constant; they transferred necessary molecular
parameters from the data on a molecule BF3 closely
resembling the structure of NO3. Because of a famous sum
rule for the Coriolis coupling constants of the two degenerate
normal modes of a planar D3h XY3 molecule28
The molecular constants of 15NO3 obtained in the present
study will be of great use in future for establishing the
vibrational assignment for NO3 in the ground electronic state,
although at present lack of some important information makes
it for us unpractical to analyze the isotopic data. One
important example of such data is those on the ν4 degenerate
mode in the gas phase. These data are indispensable to clarify
the details of the vibronic and vibration-rotation interactions
and to solve most important pending problems in NO3,
including the assignment of the 1492 cm-1 band as one of
the most central themes.
5. Conclusion
ꢀ3 + ꢀ4 ) 0
(12)
The present study reports the observation and analysis of a
few vibration-rotation bands of 15NO3 in the gas phase using
high-resolution Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The
results thus obtained are combined with those on 14NO3 and
others to critically examine the vibrational assignment of NO3
in the ground electronic state. We demonstrate, on the basis of
our gas-phase data, that both assignments I and II involve some
problems to be clarified further. To solve these important
problems, we need detailed and precise data on NO3, including
the ν4 fundamental band in the ground electronic state and the
observation and analysis of rovibronic transitions among the
X, A, and B states.
the effective value of the Coriolis coupling constant in the ν3
state reduces to
ꢀeff ) (δE)ꢀ3/2r
(13)
where δE denotes the unperturbed energy difference between
the ν3 and ν1 + ν4 states, i.e., the difference not affected by the
anharmonic resonance, whereas
2r ) [(δE)2 + 4W2]1/2
(14)
stands for the perturbed difference. The anharmonic resonance
is induced by the cubic anharmonic k134 term, which gives the
interaction matrix element W:
Acknowledgment. This work was partially supported by
JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) No. 21550009.
W ) k134/81/2
(15)
Supporting Information Available: Tables list all the
transition frequencies observed for the 2004, 2128, and 2492
cm-1 bands. This material is available free of charge via the
Kawaguchi et al. thus arrived at a value of ꢀeff ) 0.568, which
is still much larger than the observed value. It should, however,
be pointed out that, if we increase the BF3 value of k134 ) 67
to 107 cm-1, we may reproduce the observed data. This k134
value may look too large, but the vibronic interaction is likely
to substantially affect the ν4 vibration, in particular, and such
an increase of k134 is highly probable. On the other hand,
assignment II ascribes the 1492 cm-1 band to a “pure” ν3+ ν4
state, in which ꢀ3 + ꢀ4 ) 0.0 is expected, while the observed
value was ꢀ3 + ꢀ4 ) -0.2. Although it is still not easy to explain
the difference between the observed and calculated ꢀ3 + ꢀ4
values in terms of anharmonicity resonance, because no ap-
propriate candidates for the interacting states are found near
the ν3 + ν4 state, the discrepancy is smaller than that in the
case of assignment I, and some additional mechanisms such as
that discussed by Hirota et al.11 (partial quenching of vibrational
angular momentum by vibronic interaction) may explain this
discrepancy.
As stated above, assignment II ascribes the upper state of
the 1492 cm-1 band to the e′ substate of ν3 + ν4, for which the
vibrational angular momentum quantum number l ) (2.
Therefore, we expect that the rotational structure, in particular
of K′ ) 1 leading to l-type doubling, will differ considerably
from that of the fundamental band for which l ) (1, as is, in
fact, the case for a molecule closely related to NO3, i.e., SO3
studied in detail by Maki et al.29 Following Maki we have
performed the analysis based on assignment II and have
achieved fitting as good as for assignment I, although we
introduced more parameters for additional interactions such as
those among the e’ substate and the other two substates. As is
expected, the main l-type doubling parameter p34 was found to
take a value almost equal to q in assignment I. We are planning
to continue studying l-type doubling and other related phenom-
ena, which will play crucial roles in clarifying the vibrational
assignment.
References and Notes
(1) Wayne, R. P. Chemistry of Atmospheres, 3rd ed.; Oxford University
Press: New York, 2000; pp 339-344.
(2) Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.; Pitts, N. J., Jr. Chemistry of the Upper and
Lower Atmosphere: Theory, Experiments, and Applications; Academic Press:
New York, 2000.
(3) Atkinson, R.; Baulch, D. L.; Cox, R. A.; Crowley, J. N.; Hampson,
R. F.; Hynes, R. G.; Jenkin, M. E.; Rossi, M. J.; Troe, J. Atmos. Chem.
Phys. 2004, 4, 1461–1738.
(4) Jones, E. J.; Wulf, O. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1937, 5, 873.
(5) Ramsay, D. A. In Proceedings of the Tenth Colloquium Spectro-
scopicum Internationale; Lippincott, E. R., Margoshes, M., Eds.; Spartan
Books: Washington, DC, 1963; pp 583-596.
(6) Walsh, A. D. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2301–2306.
(7) Ishiwata, T.; Fujiwara, I.; Naruge, Y.; Obi, K.; Tanaka, I. J. Phys.
Chem. 1983, 87, 1349–1352.
(8) Nelson, H. H.; Pasternack, L.; McDonald, J. R. J. Phys. Chem.
1983, 87, 1286–1288.
(9) Ishiwata, T.; Tanaka, I.; Kawaguchi, K.; Hirota, E. J. Chem. Phys.
1985, 82, 2196–2205.
(10) Kawaguchi, K.; Hirota, E.; Ishiwata, T.; Tanaka, I. J. Chem. Phys.
1990, 93, 951–956.
(11) Hirota, E.; Kawaguchi, K.; Ishiwata, T.; Tanaka, I. J. Chem. Phys.
1991, 95, 771–775.
(12) Friedl, R. R.; Sander, S. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 2721–2726.
(13) Weaver, A.; Arnold, D. W.; Bradforth, S. E.; Neumark, D. M.
J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 1740–1751.
(14) Kawaguchi, K.; Ishiwata, T.; Tanaka, I.; Hirota, E. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1991, 180, 436–440.
(15) Ishiwata, T.; Tanaka, I.; Kawaguchi, K.; Hirota, E. J. Mol.
Spectrosc. 1992, 153, 167–180.
(16) Kawaguchi, K.; Ishiwata, T.; Hirota, E.; Tanaka, I. Chem. Phys.
1998, 231, 193–198.
(17) Eisfeld, W.; Morokuma, K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 5587, and
references therein.
(18) Stanton, J. F. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 134309.
(19) Ko¨ppel, H.; Domcke, W.; Cederbaum, L. S. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1984,
57, 59–246.