Page 3 of 4
JournalꢀNameꢀ
ChemComm
COMMUNICATIONꢀ
DOI: 10.1039/C4CC01320D
products (C) observed in our previous work. Alternatively, the
weakly coordinating phosphine oxide can be displaced with a second
alkyne of give complex D which following migratory insertion and
reductive elimination yields the cyclooctatriene product E.
As seen in Table 2, the Rh-BozPHOS complex provides the [4+2+2]
products with a number of substrates. Both acyclic and cyclic
dieneynes, where the diene is part of a five-member ring, provide the
cyclooctatriene products, with the latter case providing tricyclic
hexahydro-2-oxa-1H-cycloocta[cd]pentalene core. Both terminal
alkynes and acetylene proceed to give desired product with acetylene
providing the higher yields. The yields were comparable to those
obtained with the previously system.
In addition to providing a catalyst system for the [4+2+2]
reaction discussed above, the discovery of a new catalyst based on
the phosphine-phosphine oxide combination illustrates the potential
for this type of ligand system, where the dative phosphine oxide can
fill the role as a labile ligand that can provide an open coordination
site as needed. We have begun to investigate this ligand type in a
number of other ligand and reaction systems, including other
versions of this type of cycloisomerization.
The initial system was optimized by following the formation of
the [4+2+2] dimer product that is observed when a second alkyne is
not present. Following that, reactions with a second alkyne were run.
The alkynes used were terminal as well as acetylene gas. We have
observed that internal alkynes will not participate in the reaction.
The reaction with propyne (Table 2 entry 7) appears to provide two
regioisomers where the alkyne inserts in two orientations.
This work was supported by the NSF CHE-0953083. Support
from the Robert A Welch Foundation is also acknowledged.
Notes and references
While the complex used for the cycloaddition is chiral the
reaction with the acyclic achiral substrates gave the corresponding
1
.
R. T. Yu, R. K. Friedman and T. Rovis, Journal of the American
Chemical Society, 2009, 131, 13250-13251.
cycloaddition dimers with modest enantiomeric excess (~30 % ee). 2.
While the reaction does not proceed with high ee, the products are
R. T. Yu, R. K. Friedman and T. Rovis, J Am Chem Soc, 2009,
1
31, 13250-13251.
3
4
5
6
.
.
.
.
G. Hilt and J. Janikowski, Angewandte Chemie, International
Edition, 2008, 47, 5243-5245.
S. I. Lee, S. Y. Park and Y. K. Chung, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006,
348, 2531-2539.
routinely obtained in greater than 20:1 diasteromeric excess. Six-
membered ring-containing substrates provided the [4+2+2] products
however the reactions were not as clean, with aromatic by products
being isolated on workup.
J. A. Varela, L. Castedo and C. Saa, Organic Letters, 2003, 5,
2
841-2844.
P. A. Evans, J. E. Robinson, E. W. Baum and A. N. Fazal, Journal
of the American Chemical Society, 2003, 125, 14648.
S. R. Gilbertson, B. DeBoef and W. R. Counts, 2003.
R. Yamasaki, M. Ohashi, K. Maeda, T. Kitamura, M. Nakagawa,
K. Kato, T. Fujita, R. Kamura, K. Kinoshita, H. Masu, I.
Azumaya, S. Ogoshi and S. Saito, Chem. - Eur. J., 2013, 19,
P
Rh+
O
P
7.
8
.
ligand
O
R
displacement
Me
3
415-3425.
9.
R. Yamasaki, K. Kato, D. Hanitani, Y. Mutoh and S. Saito,
Tetrahedron Letters, 2013, 54, 3507-3509.
P. A. Wender, Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 7529-7550.
X. R. Zhang, J. J. Wang, H. Zhao, H. T. Zhao and J. H. Wang,
Organometallics, 2013, 32, 3529-3536.
R. Yamasaki, M. Ohashi, K. Maeda, T. Kitamura, M. Nakagawa,
K. Kato, T. Fujita, R. Kamura, K. Kinoshita, H. Masu, I.
Azumaya, S. Ogoshi and S. Saito, Chemistry-a European Journal,
2013, 19, 3415-3425.
S. L. Cui, Y. Zhang, D. H. Wang and Q. F. Wu, Chemical
Science, 2013, 4, 3912-3916.
Y. Oonishi, A. Hosotani and Y. Sato, Angewandte Chemie-
International Edition, 2012, 51, 11548-11551.
P. Kumar, K. N. Zhang and J. Louie, Angewandte Chemie-
International Edition, 2012, 51, 8602-8606.
Y. Oonishi, A. Hosotani and Y. Sato, Journal of the American
Chemical Society, 2011, 133, 10386-10389.
Z. K. Yao, J. J. Li and Z. X. Yu, Organic Letters, 2011, 13, 134-
137.
P
P
O
O
Rh+
O
Me
10.
11.
Me
E
R
H
A
O
O
1
2.
reductive
elimination
oxidative
cyclization
Me
P
O
P
reductive
elimination
P
Me
Rh3+
O
13.
14.
Rh3+
O
Me
O
P
Me
C
H
H
H
B
O
1
5.
Me
migratory
insertion
P=O
displacement
R
16.
17.
P
R
P
O
Rh3+
O
Me
1
1
2
8.
9.
0.
P. A. Inglesby and P. A. Evans, Chemical Society Reviews, 2010,
39, 2791-2805.
N. A. Petasis and M. A. Patane, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 5757-
5821.
H
D
Scheme 2. Working mechanism for the bimolecular Rh-catalyzed [4+2+2]
G. A. Molander, Accounts of Chemical Research, 1998, 31, 603-
cycloaddition and the competing intramolecular [4+2] cycloaddition
6
09.
2
2
1.
2.
G. Mehta and V. Singh, Chemical Reviews, 1999, 99, 881-930.
K. E. O. Ylijoki and J. M. Stryker, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 2244-
2
266.
While specific mechanistic work has not been undertaken, our 23.
working view of the reaction pathway is illustrated in Scheme 2.
J. B. Hendrickson and J. S. Farina, Journal of Organic Chemistry,
1980, 45, 3361-3363.
P. A. Wender and N. C. Ihle, Journal of the American Chemical
Society, 1986, 108, 4678-4679.
Y. Wang, B. D. Schill, A. M. Arif and F. G. West, Organic
Letters, 2003, 5, 2747-2750.
2
4.
Displacement of the bisolefin ligand on rhodium by the alkyne and
one of the double bonds provides A which undergoes oxidative
cyclization to yield a vinyl rhodium π-allyl intermediate B.
Reductive elimination from this species provides the [4+2] type
2
5.
Thisꢀjournalꢀisꢀ©ꢀTheꢀRoyalꢀSocietyꢀofꢀChemistryꢀ2012ꢀ
J.ꢀName.,ꢀ2012,ꢀ00,ꢀ1-3ꢀ|ꢀ3ꢀ