I.G. Smith et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 81 (2017) 27–32
29
fact that the integration of this region matches well with the ex-
pected value of 10H. In the solid-state structure of 4 (Fig. 2), the
distance between hydrogen atoms of methyl groups a, a′, and e,
methine hydrogen d and their nearest non-bonded neighbor are
all within or near the sum of the van der Waals radii which indi-
cates significant steric congestion consistent with the complicated
1
H NMR spectrum.
The H NMR spectrum of compound 5, which bears an N-phenyl
1
group, suggests decreased steric congestion in the coordination
sphere as the signals corresponding to the isopropyl group attached
to p-cymene display first order splitting indicating free rotation of
the isopropyl group and methyl group. Likewise, the 1H NMR
spectrum for compound 7 was consistent with free rotation about
the N\\Cphenyl bond and of the Cp* as indicated by a singlet at
1
.39 ppm corresponding to the methyl groups of the Cp* moiety.
1
The H NMR spectrum of compound 8 was consistent with the highly
symmetrical solid-state structure of this compound with a relatively
uncongested coordination sphere about each iridium center; the
aromatic protons of the 2,5-dimethylbenzene linker appeared as a
2
H singlet at 7.92 ppm and the methyl protons of the linker appeared
as a 6H singlet at 2.44 ppm, while the Cp* methyl protons appeared
as a 30H singlet at 1.45 ppm.
The solid-state structures of compounds 4–8 were determined
via X-ray crystallography (Figs. 2–4). Compounds 4 and 5 exhibited
structural parameters similar to a N-3-butenyl pyridine-NHC
ruthenium(II) complex reported by Saha and co-workers [50]: the
Ru\\CNHC bond distance was within 0.02 Å, the Ru\\Npyr distance
was within 0.01 Å. However, the Ru\\Cl distances in compounds 5
and 6 were 0.2 Å greater than those for the compound reported by
Saha. This difference is likely due to the greater steric demand of
the N-mesityl and N-phenyl substituents compared to the N-3-
butenyl analog. Compounds 6–8 revealed similar solid-state
structures to the related pyrimidine compounds reported by
Crabtree and co-workers [51]. Specifically, the Ir-cent, Ir\\Npyr, and
Ir\\CNHC distances for 6 were all within 0.02 Å of those reported for
the analogous mesityl-appended pyrimidine complex, and the
CNHC\\Ir\\Cl (88.43(7)° for 6 vs. 86.98(19)°) and CNHC\\Ir\\Npyr
(76.91(9)° for 6 vs. 76.7(3)°) bond angles were similar. Compound
8 revealed a highly symmetric anti arrangement of iridium metal
centers in the solid state consistent with the 1H NMR spectrum
(vide supra).
Fig. 2. ORTEP diagram of 4. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 35% probability level. PF−
counterions and non-interacting hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
6
salt (3) was metalated at 60 °C in methanol and the anion exchange
was conducted in acetonitrile to yield 8. We have prepared several
other pyridine-functionalized, arene-linked bisimidazolium salts
including the benzene-linked analog of 3, however, the 2,5-
dimethylbenzene-linked salt was chosen for this study because it
was more soluble in methanol than analogous compounds. Possibly
due to greater air/moisture sensitivity under the comparatively
harsh reaction conditions (i.e. protic solvent, elevated temperature)
attempts to isolate the analogous bimetallic ruthenium(II) com-
pound have thus far been unsuccessful.
Compounds 4–8 were evaluated for activity as transfer hydroge-
nation catalysts. Under air-free conditions, upon activation with
1
The H NMR spectra of compounds 4 and 6 revealed hindered
rotation about the N\\Cmes bond as evidenced by separate signals
for the ortho-methyl groups and meta-hydrogens of the mesityl
ring. This is consistent with the solid-state structure of these
two compounds in which one side of the mesityl group is proxi-
mal to a metal bound chloride while the other is distal. For com-
pound 4 in particular, the coordination environment around the
metal center appears somewhat distorted and the rotation around
several C\\C bonds appears to be hindered due to steric conges-
tion. For example, the difference in Cl\\Ru-centroid angle be-
tween 4 and 5 is 2.21° while the difference in the Cl\\Ir-
centroid angles for 6 and 7 is only 0.27° thus indicating greater
distortion in the case of the ruthenium(II) complexes possibly as
a result of the bulky p-cymene ligand. Indeed, the entire alkyl re-
6
KOH and KPF , each complex showed activity for catalytic transfer
hydrogenation of acetophenone to form 1-phenylethanol (Table
1). Compounds 4–6 exhibited similar activities to the pyrimidine
analogs reported by Crabtree and co-workers [51] reaching
≥92.0% conversion and ≥88 turnovers (TON) in 4 h. In the case of
the ruthenium complexes 4 and 5, the phenyl-appended compound
5 exhibited a higher activity at t = 1 h (entries 2 vs. 4, Table 1); this
may be due to the lower steric demand of the phenyl moiety com-
pared to the mesityl group. Curiously, the opposite trend was ob-
served for the analogous iridium compounds (entries 6 vs. 8,
Table 1) in which the mesityl-appended complex (6) exhibited
−
1
−1
twice the turnover frequency of 7 (TOF = 86 h
vs. 38 h ).
One possible explanation for this observation is that the presumed
16 electron phenyl-appended catalytic intermediate may undergo
ortho-metalation of the N-phenyl moiety leading to catalyst deacti-
vation. This would not be surprising in light of the propensity of
electron deficient Ir(III)-centers to participate in C\\H activation
[52]. As noted earlier, we had hoped that bimetallic complex 8
would exhibit superior activity in transfer hydrogenation to its
monometallic analogs. We were disappointed to find that this
was not the case with 8 exhibiting only ca. 20% of the activity of
6 (entries 10 vs. 6, Table 1) and ca. 45% of the activity of 7 (entries
10 vs. 8, Table 1). Two possible factors may contribute to the low
1
gion of the H NMR spectrum for 4 is quite complicated (Fig. 1)
presumably due to hindered rotation of the p-cymene ring, and
also the C\\C bonds connected to methyl groups a, a′, c, c′, and
e. For example, whereas the signal for the isopropyl methyl
groups appear as a 6H doublet for compound 5, in compound 4
the signals for c and c′ appear as broad multiplets at 0.94 ppm
and 0.57 ppm, indicating that the protons on methyl groups c
and c′ are not equivalent on the NMR timescale. The signals for
protons of methyl groups labeled a, a′, and e and the methine
proton d are likewise complex and poorly resolved despite the