A R T I C L E S
Khan et al.
Scheme 1. Diagram Illustrating the Conversion of the R- and
â-Forms of trans-Cinnamic Acid to Dimers via Topotactic
Reactions
provides in-depth information about the topotactic nature of the
reactions as well as structural changes that occurred at the
molecular level during the reaction.
In this paper, we return to certain “missing links” in the
evolving story of crystalline state [2 + 2] cycloadditions. We
have applied single-crystal X-ray analysis as well as solid-state
NMR to monitor the [2 + 2] photodimerization of R-trans-
cinnamic acid to R-truxillic acid. Crystal structures1 suggest
that R-truxillic acid is a centrosymmetric photodimer. During
1,12
1
3
the course of our study, however, C-CPMAS spectra were
reported for different conversion ratios ranging from R-trans-
1
5
cinnamic acid (0%) to R-truxillic acid (100%). In contrast to
an anticipated centrosymmetric molecular geometry of R-trux-
1
3
illic acid, the C-CPMAS spectra exhibited additional signals
for the cyclobutane ring and carbonyl region, which Hayes et
1
5
al. attributed to solid-state packing effects, e.g., distortions in
the cyclobutane ring and/or dihedral angle twists of both the
phenyl rings and carboxylic acid group. Alternatively, however,
the observed signal splittings may originate from (possibly
asymmetric) hydrogen bondings, which not only are known to
1
3
15
22,23
distinctly impact C or N spectra
but also more impor-
tantly are revealed by characteristic chemical shifts of up to 21
ppm in the respective solid-state proton NMR spectra.
surfaces, structural information cannot be obtained directly. In
contrast, vibrational spectroscopy monitors the topotactic nature
of organic solid-state reactions, but conformational details of
possible intermediate states remain vague.
23,24
Indeed, the comparison of both X-ray and NMR data turned
23,25
out to be very fruitful in many different cases,
care of the temperature settings must be taken.
but proper
X-ray crystallography is an excellent tool to investigate
photodimerization reactions of single crystals. However, many
crystals tend to shatter into microcrystalline particles as the
dimerization proceeds, rendering an X-ray analysis of obtained
products difficult. Previously, we reported the topochemically
controlled single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation of
R-trans-cinnamic acid into R-truxillic acid. Utilizing a selective
reaction procedure where the photoactive crystals are irradiated
by light for which they have low absorptivity, even crystals
In order to clearly distinguish the two possible sources of
peak splitting, we have synthesized not only mixed crystals of
photodimers at various conversion ratios but also the methyl
ester of truxillic acid. Moreover, as the hydrogen bonding can
be of dynamic nature, the X-ray structures of photodimerized
R-trans-cinnamic acid obtained at low (e.g., liquid helium-
cooled) and high temperatures (350 K) are compared and
11
13
discussed with respect to the recorded C-CPMAS NMR
spectra.
(and their corresponding X-ray structures) at intermediate stages
of the photodimerization were obtained. These can be character-
ized as substitutional mixed crystals in which the dimer and
monomer pair occupies the same lattice site with an occupancy
according to the conversion. A severe limitation of this technique
stems from the fact that it is not suitable for the characterization
of either amorphous or rather ill-defined solids that lack long-
range translational order. In addition, the localization of lighter
2. Experimental Section
trans-Cinnamic acid (Aldrich, 99%) was recrystallized from acetone
(Aldrich) to obtain the R-polymorph. The crystals were ground to small
microcrystalline particles, and about 400 mg of product were evenly
distributed in a thin layer on a 100 mm Petri dish and placed in the
focus of the lamp for irradiation. The powder sample was exposed to
broad band irradiation (material exposed to both tail irradiation and
broad band irradiation produced the same structure, except that samples
obtained by tail irradiation resulted in intact crystals suitable for single-
crystal X-ray analysis) using a 100 W high-pressure Hg lamp (Muller
electronic LXH100) for a period of 10 h to obtain 100% converted
1
1
atoms (e.g., hydrogen-bonded protons)17 may be difficult even
with sophisticated X-ray diffraction methods.18
Recently, it has been demonstrated that solid-state NMR can
also be successfully applied to monitor organic solid-state
photoreactions.1
3-16
Its unique selectivity allows for the dif-
(
22) Schilf, W.; Kamie n´ sky, B.; Szady-Chełmieniecka, A.; Grech E. J. Mol.
1
9
ferentiation of chemically distinct sites, including protons, on
the basis of the NMR chemical shift.20 Thus, solid-state NMR
Struct. 2004, 700, 105-108.
(23) Gobetto, R.; Nervi, C.; Chierotti, M. R.; Braga, D.; Maini, L.; Harris, K.
R.; Hodgkinson, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 7461-7471.
reveals molecular species present in the sample, including
products, reactants, and possible side products as well as
(24) (a) Li, S.; Zheng, S.; Su, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Ye, C.; Deng,
F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11161-11171. (b) Yates, J. R.; Pham, T.
N.; Pickard, C. J.; Mauri, F.; Amando, A. M.; Gil, A. M.; Brown, S. P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10216-10220. (c) Riedel, K.; Leppert, J.;
Ohlenschlaeger, O.; Goerlach, M.; Ramachandran, R. J. Biomol. NMR 2005,
2
1
polymorphs. Hence, the combination of solid-state NMR and
single crystal) X-ray analysis to study topochemical reactions
(
3
1, 331-336. (d) Brus, J.; Dybal, J. Macromol. 2002, 35, 10038-10047.
(
e) Brown, S. P.; Zhu, X. X.; Saalwaechter, K.; Spiess, H. W. J. Am. Chem.
(
15) Bertmer, M.; Nieuwendaal, R. C.; Barnes, A. B.; Hayes, S. E. J. Phys.
Soc. 2001, 123, 4275-4285. (f) Schnell, I.; Brown, S. P.; Low, H. Y.;
Ishida, H.; Spiess, H. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11784-11795.
(25) (a) Fyfe, C. A; Brouwer, D. H.; Lewis, A. R.; Villaescusa, L. A.; Morris,
R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7770-7778. (b) Liu, H.; Roger, M.;
Hanson, J. C.; Grey, C. P.; Martin, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
7564-7573. (c) Grey, C. P.; Poshni, F. I.; Gualtieri; A. F.; Norby, P.;
Hanson, J. C.; Corbin, D. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1981-1989.
(d) Schaller, T.; Buechele, U. P.; Klaerner, F. G.; Blaeser, D.; Boese, R.;
Brown, S. P.; Spiess, H. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1293-1303.
Chem. B 2006, 110, 6270-6273.
(
16) Harris, K. D. M.; Thomas, J. M. J. Solid State Chem. 1991, 94, 197-205.
17) Brown, S. P.; Spiess, H. W. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 4125-4155. (b) Harris,
R. K. Solid State Sci. 2004, 6, 1025-1037.
(
(18) Harris, K. D. M.; Cheung, E. Y. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 526-538.
(19) Brown, S. P. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2007, 50, 199-251.
(20) Harris, R. K. Solid State Sci. 2004, 6, 1025-1037.
(
21) Harris, R. K. The Analyst 2006, 131, 351-373.
1742 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 130, NO. 5, 2008