1076
Y. Wei, D. Pei / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2000) 1073±1076
that has limited the intracellular concentration of the
prodrugs.
agent. Although the compounds described here lack
potent in vivo antibacterial activity due to poor mem-
brane permeability, redesign with more hydrophobic
drugs or those that can be actively taken up by the
transport systems will likely provide a new class of
potent antibiotics. Such studies are currently under way.
The prodrug approach oers several advantages over
the inhibitor approach. First, the active drug is gener-
ated only inside a bacterial pathogen where active PDF
is present. Such drugs should have lower toxicity to a
eukaryotic host. Second, the prodrug approach is
extremely versatile. In principle, any agent that blocks
cell growth and requires a free nucleophile (e.g., a
hydroxyl group) for toxicity can be masked by an acyl
group to eliminate or reduce its toxicity. Once taken up
by a bacterial pathogen, the acyl group is removed to
release the cytotoxic agent, which may target any one of
the bacterial proteins essential for survival. Third, pro-
drugs of this type are more likely to be broad-spectrum
antibiotics relative to PDF inhibitors. Molecular clon-
ing and genomic sequencing have revealed a few dozen
PDF genes; their protein sequences show a wide range
of homologies (20% to 65%).13 Although the active-site
structure seems to be well conserved, a subtle dierence
at or near the active site could render a potent inhibitor
for PDF from one organism totally inactive against a
dierent pathogen. The sequence diversity should be
less of a concern for the prodrugs, because PDF is a
broad-speci®city enzyme that deformylates thousands
of bacterial proteins and the prodrugs are close mimics
of these natural substrates. Finally, bacterial cells are
less likely to develop resistance to the prodrugs than to
a PDF inhibitor. The sequence diversity of PDF pre-
dicts that a mutation in the substrate binding site (not
the active site) may be tolerated, although such a muta-
tion might change the substrate speci®city. Such a
mutation will likely aect or even abolish the inhibitor
binding, causing drug resistance. Cells with such a
mutation would still, however, be sensitive to the pro-
drugs, which are substrates of the deformylase. If a cell
encounters a mutation that prevents prodrug activation,
the mutant enzyme would likely fail to deformylate the
cell's own proteins, resulting in a fatal consequence.
Acknowledgement
Support of this work was provided by the National
Institutes of Health (Grant 1R01AI40575).
References
1. (a) Neu, H. C. Science 1992, 257, 1064. (b) Davis, J. D.
Science 1994, 264, 375. (c) Spratt, B. G. Science 1994, 264,
388.
2. (a) Mazel, D.; Pochet, S.; Marliere, P. EMBO J. 1994, 13,
914. (b) Meinnel, T.; Blanquet, S. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 7387.
3. Rajagopalan, P. T. R.; Yu, X. C.; Pei, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 12418.
4. Huntington, K. M.; Yi, T.; Wei, Y.; Pei, D. Biochemistry, in
press.
5. Santi, D. V.; McHenry, C. S.; Raines, R. T.; Ivanetich, K.
M. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 8606.
6. (a) Gisin, B. F.; Merri®eld, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972,
94, 3100. (b) Khosla, M. C.; Smeby, R.; Bumpus, F. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4721. (c) Rothe, M.; Mazanek, J. Liebigs
Ann. Chem. 1974, 439. (d) Pedroso, E.; Grandas, A.; de las
Heras, X.; Eritja, R.; Giralt, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
743. (e) Wipf, P.; Li, W.; Sekhar, V. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1991, 1, 745.
7. Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1.
8. (a) Adams, J. M. J. Mol. Biol. 1968, 33, 571. (b) Livingston,
D. M.; Leder, P. Biochemistry 1969, 8, 435.
9. Rajagopalan, P. T. R.; Datta, A.; Pei, D. Biochemistry 1997,
36, 13910.
10. Hu, Y.-J.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Rajagopalan, P. T. R.; Pei,
D. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 643.
11. Meinnel, T.; Patiny, L.; Ragusa, S.; Blanquet, S. Biochem-
istry 1999, 38, 4287.
In conclusion, we have conceptually demonstrated a
novel approach to antibacterial drug design which takes
advantage of the unique bacterial PDF to convert a
biologically inactive prodrug into an active antibacterial
12. Pine, M. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1969, 174, 359.
13. (a) Mazel, D.; Coic, E.; Blanchard, S.; Saurin, W.; Marliere,
P. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 266, 939. (b) Meinnel, T.; Lazennec, C.;
Villoing, S.; Blanquet, S. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 749.