2
44
Vol. 60, No. 2
8
23 cancer cell lines. None of them showed cytotoxicity with
6-Hydroxymusizin Glucoside (4): Pale yellow needles
1
IC50 far beyond 50μM.
(MeOH); H-NMR (500MHz, acetone-d ) δ : 7.09 (1H, d,
6
H
J=2.0Hz, H-5), 6.94 (1H, s, H-4), 6.77 (1H, d, J=2.5Hz, H-7),
Experimental
2.53 (3H, s, 2-COCH ), 2.26 (3H, s, 3-CH ); Glc: 5.16 (1H,
3
3
General Procedures NMR spectra were recorded on d, J=7.5Hz, H-1′), 3.48—3.66 (4H, m, H-2′, 3′, 4′, 5′), 3.77
1
13
Bruker ACF-500 NMR instruments ( H: 500MHz, C: (1H, dd, J=6.0, 12.0Hz, H-6′a), 4.00 (1H, dd, J=2.0, 12.0Hz,
13
1
25MHz), with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. H-6′b); C-NMR (125MHz, acetone-d ) δ : 204.7 (2-COCH ),
6 C 3
Mass spectra were obtained on a MS Agilent 1100 series LC/ 157.8 (C-1), 157.0 (C-6), 153.3 (C-8), 138.8 (C-4a), 135.0 (C-3),
MSD ion-trap mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) and a Mariner 123.3 (C-2), 119.2 (C-4), 109.3 (C-8a), 105.0 (C-5), 104.4 (C-7),
ESI-time-of-flight (TOF) spectrometer (HR-ESI-MS), respec- 32.5 (2-COCH ), 20.2 (3-CH ); Glc: 104.0 (C-1′), 78.5 (C-3′),
3
3
tively. IR (KBr disks) spectra were recorded by Bruker Tensor 77.8 (C-5′), 74.6 (C-2′), 71.3 (C-4′), 62.6 (C-6′).
2
7 spectrometer. UV spectra were measured on a Shimadzu
Torachrysone Glucoside (5): Pale yellow needles (MeOH);
H-NMR (500MHz, acetone-d ) δ : 7.07 (1H, s, H-4), 7.04
1
UV-2501 PC spectrophotometer. Optical rotations were con-
6
H
ducted on a JASCO P-1020 polarimeter. RP-C18 (40—63μm, (1H, d, J=2.0Hz, H-5), 6.89 (1H, d, J=2.5Hz, H-7), 3.89 (3H,
Fuji) were used for column chromatography. Preparative s, 6-CH ), 2.53 (3H, s, 2-COCH ), 2.28 (3H, s, 3-CH ); Glc:
3
3
3
HPLC was carried out using an Agilent 1100 Series instru- 5.21 (1H, d, J=7.5Hz, H-1′), 3.51—3.66 (4H, m, H-2′, 3′, 4′,
ment with a shim-park RP-C18 column (20×200mm) and a 5′), 3.76 (1H, dd, J=6.0, 12.0Hz, H-6′a), 3.97 (1H, dd, J=2.5,
1
3
1
100 Series multiple wavelength detector. The GC-MS system 12.0Hz, H-6′b); C-NMR (125MHz, acetone-d ) δ : 204.7
6 C
consisted of a Varian CP-3800 gas chromatograph interfaced (2-COCH ), 159.8 (C-1), 156.8 (C-6), 152.9 (C-8), 138.5 (C-4a),
3
with a Varian Saturn 2200 mass spectrometer.
135.2 (C-3), 124.2 (C-2), 119.8 (C-4), 110.0 (C-8a), 104.0 (C-5),
Plant Material The roots of Rheum palmatum were col- 103.9 (C-7), 55.8 (6-OCH ), 32.4 (2-COCH ), 20.1 (3-CH );
3
3
3
lected from Li county, Gansu province, China, in August 2010, Glc: 102.2 (C-1′), 78.6 (C-3′), 77.8 (C-5′), 74.6 (C-2′), 71.2 (C-
and were authenticated by Professor Min-Jian Qin of Research 4′), 62.4 (C-6′).
Department of Pharmacognosy, China Pharmaceutical
University. The voucher specimen (No. RP-201008) was de- powder; H-NMR (500MHz, DMSO-d ) δ : 12.84 (1H,
Chrysophanol 8-O-β-D-(6′-O-Malonyl)glucoside (6): Yellow
1
6
H
posited at the Department of Natural Medicinal Chemistry, s, 1-OH), 12.78 (1H, brs, 3″-COOH), 7.88 (1H, dd, J=7.5,
China Pharmaceutical University.
7.5Hz, H-6), 7.88 (1H, d, J=7.5Hz, H-5), 7.65 (1H, dd, J=2.0,
Extraction and Isolation The air-dried and powdered 8.0Hz, H-7), 7.51 (1H, brs, H-4), 7.2 (1H, brs, H-2), 3.39
roots of R. palmatum (500g) were extracted with EtOH under (2H, d, J=9.0Hz, H-2″), 2.43 (3H, s, 3-CH ); Glc: 5.19 (1H,
3
reflux and then filtered by filter paper. The EtOH extract was d, J=8.0Hz, H-1′), 3.25—3.73 (4H, m, H-2′, 3′, 4′, 5′), 4.12
concentrated by evaporation; the residue (52g) was suspended (1H, dd, J=7.0, 12.0Hz, H-6′a), 4.43 (1H, dd, J=1.5, 12.0Hz,
1
3
in H O and partitioned with EtOAc. The EtOAC fraction H-6′b); C-NMR (125MHz, DMSO-d ) δ : 187.5 (C-9), 182.1
2
6
C
(
13g) was subjected to MCI gel and eluted with MeOH/H O (C-10), 167.9 (C-3″), 166.8 (C-1″), 161.6 (C-1), 157.9 (C-8),
2
(
0:10, 2:8, 5:5, 10:0) to give four further fractions, E1—E4. 147.6 (C-3), 136.0 (C-6), 134.8 (C-10a), 132.1 (C-4a), 124.1
Fraction E3 was subsequently subjected to ODS open column (C-4), 122.4 (C-5), 120.7 (C-7), 120.6 (C-2), 119.4 (C-8a), 114.8
chromatography (MeOH/H O, 30:70 to 50:50) to afford (C-9a), 41.5 (C-2″), 21.5 (3-CH ); Glc: 100.2 (C-1′), 76.3 (C-3′),
2
3
fractions EO1 to EO3. Fraction EO1 was further purified by 73.9 (C-5′), 73.2 (C-2′), 69.6 (C-4′), 64.1 (C-6′).
preparative HPLC (MeOH/H O, 35:65) to yield 4 (18mg).
Sugar Analysis Compounds 1—3 (4mg each) dissolved in
Fraction EO2 was purified by preparative HPLC (MeOH/H O, acetonitrile (3mL) and 2M HCl (3mL) were refluxed at 90°C
2
2
4
0:60) to give 1 (14mg), 2 (23mg) and 5 (45mg). Fraction for 3h. The reactant solution was concentrated and the residue
EO3 was purified by preparative HPLC(acetonitrile/H O, was suspended with H O and extracted with EtOAc (3mL×3).
2
2
2
8:72) to afford 3 (25mg) and 6 (35mg).
Rheumone A (1): Yellow powder, [α]D −38.4 (c=0.03, with authentic sugars developed with CH Cl –MeOH–H O
The aqueous layer was concentrated and examined by co-TLC
2
5
2
2
2
pyridine); UV λmax (acetonitrile) nm (logε): 350 (3.03), 234 (6:4:1). A portion of the aqueous layer was evaporated to
−1
(
3.77); IR (KBr) cm : 3496, 2961, 2918, 1649, 1629, 1571; dryness and then dissolved in anhydrous pyridine (0.3mL), to
1
13
H- and C-NMR spectral data: see Table 1; ESI-MS m/z: which L-cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride (5mg) was added.
−
+
4
17.0 [M−H] ; HR-ESI-MS m/z: 441.1161 [M+Na] (Calcd for The mixture stayed warm at 60°C for 2h, to which hexameth-
C H O Na: 441.1156).
yldisilazan (0.3mL) and trimethylsilyl chloride (0.3mL) were
21
22
9
1
-O-Phloroglucinyl-2-O-galloyl-6-O-cinnamoyl-β-D- added, kept warm at 60°C for another 1h. The final reactant
2
5
glucoside (2): Off-white amorphous powder, [α] : −27.2 was partitioned between H O and n-hexane (each 0.3mL),
D
2
(
c=0.07, acetone); UV λ
(MeOH) nm (logε): 276 (4.56), and the n-hexane extract was subjected to GC-MS (70eV)
05 (4.90); IR (KBr) cm : 3422, 2963, 1703, 1608; H- and analysis under the following conditions: column, CP-sil 5 CB
max
−
1
1
2
13
C-NMR spectral data: see Table 2; ESI-MS m/z: 569.1 (15m×0.25mm×0.25µm); column temperature, 150—260°C
−
+
[
M−H] ; HR-ESI-MS m/z: 593.1258 [M+Na] (Calcd for with an increase rate of 8°C/min; carrier gas, He (1mL/min).
In the acid hydrolysates of 1—3, only D-glucose was detected
Chrysophanol 1-O-β-D-(6′-O-Malonyl)glucoside (3): Yellow by comparision of the retention time (tR 15.24min) of their
C H O Na: 593.1266).
2
8
26 13
2
5
powder, [α] : −47.9 (c=0.07, acetone); UV λ
(MeOH) nm derivatives with that of the authentic D-glucose derivative pre-
D
max
−1
(
2
logε): 409 (3.66), 258 (4.16), 222 (4.30); IR (KBr) cm : 3421, pared in the same way.
921, 1733, 1672, 1632, 1599; H- and C-NMR spectral data:
see Table 3; ESI-MS m/z: 500.5 [M−H] ; HR-ESI-MS m/z: their in vitro cytotoxicities using human hepatocellular can-
25.1003 [M+Na] (Calcd for C H O Na: 525.1003).
1
13
Cytotoxic Activity All these isolates were evaluated for
−
+
5
cer cell lines Bel-7402 and Bel-7402/5Fu, and human gastric
2
4
22 12