allowed the attachment of CH2-1000 to C-3a00. A methox-
ycarbonyl group was attached to both C-1000 and C-100
based on the HMBC correlations from H2-1000 and the O-
methyl proton signals (δH = 3.79) to C-1100 and from
H-8b00, H-100, and the O-methyl proton signals (δH = 3.31)
to C-900. The linkage of C-100 and C-300 via oxygen was
determined by the HMBC correlation between H-100 and
C-300. The index of hydrogen deficiency of 26 in compound
1 was accounted for by the isocorilagin moiety (17), four
carbonyl groups (4), a pyrogallol ring (4), and a furan ring
(1). The remaining index of hydrogen deficiency required
the presence of an additional ring. Analysis of the 13C
NMR data suggested the presence of an ether bridge
between oxygenated quaternary carbon C-3a00 and aro-
matic carbon C-4a00 to furnish a ring. Thus, the molecular
structure of the remaining part was determined as the rare
5,6-dihydroxy-3a-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethyl)-1-(methoxycar-
bonyl)-3-oxo-1,3,3a,8b-tetrahydrofuro[3,4-b]benzofuran-
8-carboxylic acid moiety.8 Finally, the HMBC correlation
between H-4 and C-1200 facilitated the placement of this
structural unit at C-4 of the glucopyranosyl core via an
ester bridge.
issue.11 The mandatory assigned (100R, 3a00R, 8b00R)-con-
figuration was selected for the conformational search of 1a
by using the OPLS2005 force field in the Schrodinger 9.2
MacroModel software package. After the detailed calcu-
lated ECD analysis (SI S4.1), the (100R, 3a00R, 8b00R)
absolute configuration of partial structure 1a was unequi-
vocally confirmed.
Compound 2 was isolated from the same fraction as 1
and had the same molecular formula (C43H34O28) and
similar UV, IR, 1H, and 13C NMR spectra as compound 1.
1
A combined analysis of H, 13C NMR (SI Table S2),
1
1Hꢀ H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC data of 2 indicated
that it possessed the same molecular structure as 1. The
glucopyranosyl core also had the same conformation and
D-configuration. The experimental ECD spectrum exhib-
ited a negative Cotton effect at 233 nm indicative of an
HHDP moiety with an (R)-configured biphenyl bond. The
anomeric galloyl group was assigned an R-equatorial
orientation based on the ca. 1.0 Hz coupling constant of
theanomericproton. The 5,6-dihydroxy-3a-(2-methoxy-2-
oxoethyl)-1-(methoxycarbonyl)-3-oxo-1,3,3a,8b-tetrahy-
drofuro[3,4-b]benzofuran-8-carboxylic acid moiety also
showed the same relative configuration as 1. Thus, 1 and 2
only differ as far as the absolute configuration of this rare
structural moiety is concerned. Compound 2 is, thus, a
(C-100, C-3a00, C-8b00) quasi-enantiomer of compound 1
and accordingly named punicatannin B.
The relative configuration of the 5,6-dihydroxy-3a-(2-
methoxy-2-oxoethyl)-1-(methoxycarbonyl)-3-oxo-1,3,3a,
8b-tetrahydrofuro[3,4-b]benzofuran-8-carboxylic acid moi-
ety was determined by the ROESY spectrum and the
H-100ꢀH-8b00 coupling constant (9.6 Hz) reminiscent of
the cis-configuration of these protons.9 The ROESY corre-
lation between H-8b00 and H-1000 indicated that H-8b00 and
the C-3a00 2-methoxy-2-oxoethyl group were cofacial.
A combination of electronic circular dichroism (ECD)
analyses, chemical hydrolysis, and calculated ECD spectra
were used to elucidate the absolute configuration of com-
pound 1. First, the HHDP moiety was assigned an R-
configuration by the negative Cotton effect at 234 nm.
Notably, a Cotton effect at 235 nm is a diagnostic criterion
in determining the absolute configuration of HHDP units
in ellagitannins, which is unaffected by the presence or
absence of galloyl groups and the conformation of the
glucose core.10 Acid hydrolysis of 1 afforded D-glucose,
which was identified by direct comparison with an authen-
tic sample (SI S1). However, the challenging issue to
determine the absolute configuration of the acyl group
linked at C-4 in compound 1 still remained. Hydrolysis of 1
Scheme 1. Postulated Biosynthesis of the 4-Acyl Group of
Punicatannins A (1) and B (2)
1
in hot water yields 1a, which was confirmed by the H
A possible biosynthetic pathway to the 5,6-dihydroxy-
3a-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethyl)-1-(methoxycarbonyl)-3-oxo-
1,3,3a,8b-tetrahydrofuro[3,4-b]benzofuran-8-carboxylic
acid moiety of compounds 1and 2is postulated in Scheme 1.
Its biosynthetic precursor is proposed to be an HHDP
group, similar to that in, e.g., compound 1, which is
converted into A by oxidation and ketoꢀenol tautomer-
ism. Intermediate A would be cleaved into ketene B by
hydrolysis.12 This may be hydrolytically transformed into
the enantiomeric intermediates C1 and C2 that may under-
go a 1,4-Michael addition reaction to yield intermediates
D1 and D2. These may be converted into E1 and E2 by
NMR and mass spectra (SI S20 and S21). As the absolute
configuration of 1a could not be resolved directly by the
analysis of its ECD curve, comparison between experi-
mental and calculated ECD spectra using the time-depen-
dent DFT method was successfully applied to resolve this
(8) Jiang, Z. H.; Wen, X. Y.; Tanaka, T.; Wu, S. Y.; Liu, Z.; Iwata,
H.; Hirose, Y.; Wu, S.; Kouno, I. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 719–723.
´
(9) Farina, F.; Maestro, M. C.; Mattın, M. V.; Soria, M. L. Tetra-
hedron 1987, 43, 4007–4014.
(10) (a) Okuda, T.; Yoshida, T.; Hatano, T.; Ito, H. In Chemistry and
Biology of Ellagitannins, An Underestimated Class of Bioactive Plant
Polyphenols; Quideau, S., Ed.; World Scientific Publishing: Singapore,
2009; Vol. 1, pp 1ꢀ54. (b) Ding, Y.; Li, X. C.; Ferreira, D. J. Nat. Prod.
2009, 72, 327–335.
€
(12) Mayer, W.; Hoffmann, E. H.; Losch, N.; Wolf, H.; Wolter, B.;
(11) Diedrich, C.; Grimme, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 2524–2539.
Schilling, G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1984, 5, 929–938.
5360
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 20, 2012