spectrometer using m-nitrobenzyl alcohol (NBA) as the matrix. MeOH); UV (MeOH): lmax (log e) = 225 (4.1), 268 (3.4) nm; IR
Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia Biotech) was used for open column (KBr): nmax = 3372, 1603, 1516, 1464, 1423, 1165, 1117, 1074
chromatography. HPLC was performed using an ODS column cm±1; 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): d = 6.27 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6),
(Hyperprep ODS, 10 mm i.d.250 mm, Keystone Scientific Inc., 6.24 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 4.79 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, H-1¢), 3.90 (dd,
Bellefonte, PA; detector, RI) and a silica column (Hyperprep HS J = 11.9, 1.2 Hz, H-6¢a), 3.74 (s, H3 ±7), 3.69 (dd, J = 11.9, 5.4 Hz,
silica, 10 mm i.d.250 mm, ThermoQuest Hypersil, Runcorn, H-6¢b), 3.2±3.45 (m, H-2¢, 3¢, 4¢, 5¢), 1.94 (s, H3 ±8); 13C-NMR
UK; detector, RI). TLC was performed using silica gel 60 F254 (CD3OD, 300 MHz): d = 160.4 (C-5), 158.1 (C-1), 157.2 (C-3),
plates (200 mm, Merck, Germany).
107.5 (C-4), 102.7 (C-1¢), 97.6 (C-2), 93.4 (C-6), 78.2 (C-3¢ or C-
5¢), 78.1(C-5 ¢ or C-3¢), 74.9 (C-2¢), 71.5 (C-4¢), 62.6 (C-6¢), 56.0
Plant material
(C-7), 7.9 (C-8); FAB-MS (NBA): m/z = 339 [M+Na]+ (34), 154
+
Leaves of M. quinquenervia (CAV.) S. T. Blake were collected at the (100); HR-FAB-MS (NBA): m/z = 317.1250 [M+H] calcd. for
Academia Sinica, Taipei on March 16, 2001 and were identified
by Mr. Chii-Cheng Liao, Department of Botany, National Taiwan
C14H20O8 + H: 317.1236.
University. Voucher specimens (No. 20 010316) have been de- 4-Benzoyl-2-C-b-glucopyranosyl-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methylphenyl b-
posited at the Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica, Nakang, Tai- D-glucopyranoside peracetate (2a): amorphous white powder;
pei, Taiwan.
m.p. 125±1268C; [a]D25: ±1 7.89 (c 0.48, CH2Cl2); UV (CH2Cl2):
lmax (log e) = 256 (4.6), 230 (4.3) nm; IR (KBr): nmax = 2942,
1755, 1674, 1599, 1435, 1369, 1223, 1039 cm ; H-NMR (CDCl3,
±1
1
Extraction and isolation
Fresh leaves of M. quinquenervia (650 g) were successively ex- 500 MHz): d = 7.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-3¢, -7¢), 7.56 (t, J = 7.5 Hz,
tracted three times with 3 L of MeOH at room temperature. The H-5¢), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4¢, -6¢), 5.47 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, H-2¢¢¢),
methanolic extract was adjusted to 85% in aqueous solution for 5.43 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, H-2¢¢), 5.35 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, H-3¢¢¢), 5.26 (t,
an n-hexane partition, which generated two fractions soluble in J = 8.2 Hz, H-3¢¢), 5.25 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, H-1¢¢¢), 5.24 (t, J = 8.2 Hz,
aqueous methanol and n-hexane. Subsequently, the aqueous me- H-4¢¢), 5.00 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, H-4¢¢¢), 4.84 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-1¢¢), 4.48
thanol-soluble fraction was then evaporated in vacuum to dry- (dd, J = 12.5, 3.2 Hz, H-6¢¢a), 4.28 (dd, J = 12.6, 4.8 Hz, H-6¢¢¢a),
ness (52 g) and further partitioned between chloroform (500 3.88 (br d, J = 12.5, H-6¢¢b), 3.76 (br d, J = 12.6, H-6¢¢¢b), 3.72 (m,
mL2) and water (500 mL), and the remaining water solution H-5¢¢¢), 3.65 (m, H-5¢¢), 2.08, 2.07, 2.04, 2.01, 2.00, 1.98, 1.95, 1.94,
was extracted three times with n-butanol (500 mL). The n-buta- 1.85, 1.78 (s, OAc10), 2.06 (s, H ±7); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 300
3
nol layer was evaporated to a brown residue and redissolved in MHz): 948; = 191.1 (C-1¢), 170.3, 170.23, 169.5, 169.4, 169.2,
MeOH for chromatographic separation. The first separation step 168.7, 167.8, 167.7 (OCOCH3 10), 154.1 (C-1), 148.7 (C-3), 146.3
was carried out using gel filtration chromatography on a Sepha- (C-5), 136.8 (C-2¢), 133.5 (C-5¢), 129.8 (C-3¢, -7¢), 128.4 (C-4¢, -6¢),
dex LH-20 column (355 cm) and eluted by MeOH with a flow 126.0 (C-4), 122.9 (C-6), 122.5 (C-2), 101.7 (C-1¢¢), 75.8 (C-5¢¢¢),
rate of 13 mL/min. Each fraction (15 mL) collected from then-bu- 74.4 (C-3¢¢¢), 73.9 (C-1¢¢¢), 72.8 (C-3¢¢), 72.2 (C-5¢¢), 71.7 (C-2¢¢),
tanol layer was checked for their compositions by TLC using 70.4 (C-2¢¢¢), 68.6 (C-4¢¢¢), 67.2 (C-4¢¢), 62.2 (C-6¢¢¢), 60.9 (C-6¢¢),
EtOAc/HCO2H/H2O (85:10:15) for development. Observation 20.7, 20.64, 20.52, 20.4, 20.2, 20.1(OCO CH3 10), 10.1 (C-7);
under UV 254 nm and dipping in vanillin-sulfuric acid (brown FAB-MS (NBA): m/z = 989 [M+H]+ (12), 947 (7), 617 (8), 331
or orange spots) were used in the detection of glycosides. Subse- (70), 169 (100), 109 (37); HR-FAB-MS (NBA): m/z = 989.2935
quently, the glycoside fractions (#fr. 11 ±19) from above se- [M+H]+ calcd for C46H52O24 + H: 989.2927.
493
paration were combined to give subfraction 1and 2. HPLC of sub-
fraction 1on a reversed-phase column with MeCN/H O (20:80) Compound 3, [a]D25: ±40.28 (c 0.64, MeOH), was characterized as a
2
as eluent, 2 mL/min, afforded 3 (56 mg), 4 (45 mg), and 5 (6 mg), mixture (3a: 3b = 4:1 ) of 2e-ndo-b-D-glucopyranosyloxy-1,8-ci-
retention time: 16.2, 11.5 and 12.4 min, respectively. Subfraction neole (3a) and 2-exo-b-D-glucopyranosyloxy-1,8-cineole (3b), ob-
2 was purified by using the same column with MeCN/H2O tained previously from Eucalyptus perriniana [6] and Salvia
(15:85) as eluent to yield 1 (11 mg) and crude mixture of2 (25 bucharica [7], respectively. Compound 4, [a]D25: + 83.58 (c 0.50,
mg), retention time: 10.1 and 10.8 min, respectively. Crude mix- MeOH), was identified as roseoside, having been isolated from aer-
ture of 2 (10 mg) was dissolved in pyridine (3 mL) with Ac2O (3 ial parts of Epimedium grandiflorum [8]. Compound 5, [a]D25: ±858
mL), and the mixture left overnight at room temperature. Then, (c 0.25, MeOH), was determined to be citroside A, and its spectral
ice water (30 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, and the re- data were in good agreement with the published data [9].
sultant suspension was extracted with ethyl acetate (30 mL2).
The ethyl acetate layer was purified using a normal-phase col- Bioassays
umn with n-Hex/CHCl3/EtOAc (1:1:1) as eluent, 2 mL/min, to In vitro vascular tension study: The details of the experimental
yield the pure peracetylated derivative 2a (9.5 mg).
procedures have been described previously [10]. Briefly, Spra-
gue-Dawley rats were sacrificed by decapitation, and sections of
Acid hydrolysis: Compounds 1 and 2 (5 mg) were hydrolyzed by the thoracic aorta between the aortic arch and the diaphragm
2N HCl (2 mL) at room temperature overnight. The reaction mix- were excised carefully. Isolated aortic rings 3 to 4 mm in length
ture was then partitioned with EtOAc (2 mL2). The lower layer were fixed isometrically in organ chambers under passive ten-
was neutralized using Amberlite IRA-400 resin (Fluka, Switzer- sion of 1.8 g for 60 min. The changes of vascular tension were re-
land), filtered with glass wool, and the filtrate was evaporated corded with a polygraph (Gould, model 2400, Vally View, OH,
to give D-glucose: [a]D25: + 47.18 (c 0.075, H2O).
USA) via a force displacement transducer (Grass FTO3, Quincy,
MASS, USA) and simultaneously displayed on the monitor of an
3-Hydroxy-5-methoxy-4-methylphenyl b-D-glucopyranoside (1): IBM-compatible computer after being digitized (PowerLab,
amorphous white powder; m.p. 112±1148C; [a]D25: ±658 (c 0.30, ADInstruments Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia). After equilibration,