Antimalarial Efficacy of SN-119 Derivatives
strains of bird malaria, demonstrating that HEAQ was as effective ambient temperature, an off-white crystalline solid formed in the still
as but less potent than quinine against Plasmodium lophurae, P. pot and was filtered via vacuum filtration to obtain 6.85 g (72% yield).
The product was consistent with previously reported characterization
relictum, and P. cathemerium (16–18). Most intriguing is a report
by W. W. G. Machlachlan in 1963, in which he states, “We were
aware of the fact that in malaria hydroxyethylapocupreine
1
data. H NMR (500 MHz, CD OD) ␦ 8.60 (d, J ϭ 4.56 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d,
3
J ϭ 9.12 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J ϭ 4.56 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (dd, J ϭ 2.52, 9.12 Hz,
1
1
H), 7.30 (d, J ϭ 2.52 Hz, 1H), 5.76 (ddd, J ϭ 7.47, 10.14, 17.29 Hz,
H), 5.54 (d, J ϭ 3.14 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (td, J ϭ 1.49, 17.13 Hz, 1H), 4.92
[HEAQ] was as effective as quinine as observed in some clinical
cases in veterans from Korea and also in Venezuela, in addition to
experimental studies recorded by Hegner et al.” (19). Because no
formal human trials have been conducted for the use of HEAQ
(
2
td, J ϭ 1.34, 10.38 Hz, 1H), 3.68 to 3.80 (m, 1H), 3.08 to 3.20 (m, 2H),
.68 to 2.82 (m, 2H), 2.40 (br. s., 1H), 1.85 to 1.97 (m, 2H), 1.79 to 1.85
(m, 1H), 1.56 to 1.68 (m, 1H), 1.46 (tdd, J ϭ 3.30, 10.06, 13.20 Hz, 1H).
against Plasmodium falciparum, we sought to examine activity in 13
C NMR (126 MHz, CD OD) ␦ 158.1, 149.6, 147.6, 144.1, 142.4, 131.6,
3
vitro with human P. falciparum and in vivo with the mouse malaria
128.5, 123.5, 120.0, 115.3, 105.3, 72.0, 61.1, 57.5, 44.5, 40.8, 29.2, 28.0,
model as well as the important chemical property of quinolines to 21.7.
inhibit human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) channels.
Preparation of demethyl quinidine. The same procedure for the con-
Here we resynthesized and tested HEAQ, in addition to three version of quinine to demethyl quinine was used for the conversion of
quinidine (5.00 g; 15.4 mmol) to demethyl quinidine, but the product did
novel compounds, hydroxyethylquinine (HEQ) and the diastereom-
not crystallize. Oil was purified via flash chromatography (gradient of
ers hydroxyethylquinidine (HEQD) and hydroxyethylapoquinidine
99% CHCl plus 1% Et N to 10% methanol [MeOH]–89% CHCl plus
3 3 3
(HEAQD), againstP. falciparuminvitroaswellasinamurinemalaria
1
% Et N) to obtain 3.47 g of a yellow glass. This material contained ap-
3
model to determine the efficacy of these drugs compared to those of
the parent compounds quinine and quinidine. Further characteriza-
tion in regard to heme crystal inhibition and chemical properties of
these derivatives was also conducted along with cytotoxicity and
hERG channel studies using a human fibroblast cell line and Chinese
hamster ovary (CHO) cells, respectively.
proximately 10% quinidine and was carried on to the next step without
further purification.
Preparation of hydroxyethylapoquinine (HEAQ) and hydroxyethyl-
apoquinidine (HEAQD) was carried out as described previously by Carl-
son and Cretcher (21), as follows.
Preparation of HEQ. Ethylene carbonate (5.25 g, 59.6 mmol, 20.0
equivalents), potassium carbonate (824 mg, 5.96 mmol, 2.00 equivalents),
demethyl quinine 2 (926 mg, 2.98 mmol, 1.00 equivalent), and 5 ml an-
hydrous tert-butanol were added to a single-necked 50-ml round-bottom
flask equipped with a reflux condenser. The reaction mixture was placed
into a preheated oil bath (95°C) for 1 h. The reaction mixture was then
poured while still hot onto ice and approximately 10 to 20 ml of 5 M
aqueous NaOH. The reaction mixture was extracted with dichlorometh-
ane, and volatiles were removed to obtain a brown oil. This material was
purified via flash chromatography (gradient of 99% CHCl plus 1% Et N
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General synthesis information. All reagents and solvents were used as
supplied by commercial sources, without further purification. All dry sol-
vents were purchased from Aldrich as Sure Seal bottles. Reactions involv-
ing air- and/or moisture-sensitive reagents were carried out under an
argon atmosphere using glassware that was dried under a vacuum with a
heat gun. The evacuated flask was then filled with argon. The reactions
were monitored by thin-layer chromatography using Analtech chroma-
tography plates (silica gel hard-layer inorganic binder plus calcium sulfate
with fluorescent indicator UV254 [GHLF], 250 m). Visualization was
performed by UV light (254 and 365 nm) and/or by staining with potas-
sium permanganate. Flash chromatography was performed by using a
Grace Reveleris flash purification system and Grace silica cartridges (av-
3
3
to 10% MeOH–89% CHCl plus 1% Et N) to obtain 854 mg of a brown
3
3
glass. The brown glass was dissolved in ca. 5 ml of hot 95% ethyl alcohol
EtOH), allowed to cool to ambient temperature, and then placed into a
(
Ϫ20°C freezer. Pink-tan crystals formed (726 mg) and were collected by
1
vacuum filtration. H NMR (500 MHz, CD OD) ␦ 8.66 (d, J ϭ 4.56 Hz,
3
1
13
1H), 7.96 (d, J ϭ 9.12 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (d, J ϭ 4.56 Hz, 1H), 7.42 to 7.51 (m,
erage particle size, 40 m). H (500-MHz) and C (125-MHz) nuclear
2H), 5.76 (ddd, J ϭ 7.62, 10.14, 17.29 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (d, J ϭ 3.14 Hz, 1H),
magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of compounds were obtained by us-
1
4.97 (td, J ϭ 1.49, 17.13 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (td, J ϭ 1.34, 10.37 Hz, 1H), 4.20 to
4.29 (m, 2H), 3.93 to 4.01 (m, 2H), 3.69 (dddd, J ϭ 2.36, 5.03, 10.65, 13.24
Hz, 1H), 3.06 to 3.17 (m, 2H), 2.64 to 2.78 (m, 2H), 2.36 (br. s., 1H), 1.83
to 1.96 (m, 2H), 1.76 to 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.54 to 1.65 (m, 1H), 1.46 (tdd, J ϭ
ing a Varian Mercury spectrometer. H NMR spectra recorded in deuter-
13
ated methanol (CD OD) were referenced to 3.310 ppm. C NMR spectra
3
recorded in CD OD were referenced to 39.15 ppm. Accurate mass deter-
3
minations were recorded by the Mass Spectrometry Facility located at the
University of California, Riverside.
1
3
3
1
6
.22, 9.96, 13.15 Hz, 1H). C NMR (126 MHz, CD OD) ␦ 159.1, 150.7,
3
48.3, 144.9, 142.8, 131.6, 128.2, 123.8, 120.2, 115.1, 103.4, 72.3, 71.4, 61.7,
1.2, 57.7, 44.3, 41.0, 29.3, 28.3, 21.8. high-resolution mass spectrometry
HRMS) (m/z): [MH ] calculated for C H N O 355.2016, found
Preparation of demethyl quinine. Preparation of demethyl quinine
(
cupreine) was a modified procedure adapted from procedures reported
ϩ
(
by Xu et al. (36) and Furuya et al. (37). A 500-ml three-necked flask
equipped with an argon inlet, a reflux condenser, and a large magnetic stir
bar (38 by 16 mm) was charged with N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)
21 27 2 3
355.2012.
Preparation of HEQD. Ethylene carbonate (19.7 g, 224 mmol, 20.0
equivalents), potassium carbonate (3.09 g, 22.4 mmol, 2.00 equivalents),
crude demethyl quinidine (3.47 g, 11.2 mmol, 1.00 equivalent), and 18.6
ml anhydrous tert-butanol were added to a single-necked 100 ml RBF
(
100 ml) and 95% sodium hydride (5.92 g, 247 mmol, 8 equivalents).
Ethanethiol (Stench!) (18.3 ml, 247 mmol, 8 equivalents) was added drop-
wise with cooling with an ice water bath. Note that after the addition of
approximately 10 ml of ethanethiol, stirring became difficult. The reac- equipped with a reflux condenser. The reaction mixture was placed into a
tion mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature, and quinine preheated oil bath (95°C) for 3 h. The reaction mixture was then poured
(
10.0 g, 30.8 mmol, 1 equivalent) was added in one portion. Once the while still hot onto ice and 10 to 20 ml of 5 M aqueous NaOH. The
reaction mixture could be efficiently stirred, the remainder of the ethane- reaction mixture was extracted with dichloromethane to obtain a brown
thiol was added dropwise at room temperature. Once the addition of oil, which was purified via flash chromatography (gradient of 99% CHCl
ethanethiol was complete, the reaction mixture was stirred at 100°C for 24 plus 1% Et N to 10% MeOH–89% CHCl plus 1% Et N) to obtain a
3
3
3
3
h. The reaction mixture was cooled to ambient temperature and quenched reddish-orange glass. This material was crystallized from hot ethyl acetate
1
with saturated aqueous NH Cl and water, and the aqueous layer was ex- to obtain 1.79 g of an off-white crystalline solid. H NMR (500 MHz,
4
tracted with ethyl acetate (3 by 200 ml). The organic phase was dried with CD OD) ␦ 8.66 (d, J ϭ 4.56 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (d, J ϭ 9.12 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J ϭ
3
anhydrous MgSO , and approximately 300 ml of volatiles was removed by 4.56 Hz, 1H), 7.41 to 7.48 (m, 2H), 6.14 to 6.21 (m, 1H), 5.63 (d, J ϭ 3.14
4
simple distillation in a well-ventilated hood (Stench!). During cooling to Hz, 1H), 5.05 to 5.14 (m, 2H), 4.20 to 4.27 (m, 2H), 3.96 (t, J ϭ 4.72 Hz,
February 2014 Volume 58 Number 2
aac.asm.org 821