1526
M. Matsumoto et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 1523–1527
efficiency between 1 and 2 might be attributed to the
5. Kopecky, K. R.; Lockwood, P. A.; Gomez, R. R.; Ding,
J.-Y. Can. J. Chem. 1981, 59, 851–858.
difference in stereochemistry of the dioxetane ring.25
6. Adam, W.; Peters, E.-M.; Peters, K.; Platsch, H.;
Schmidt, E.; Von Schnering, H. G.; Takayama, K. J.
Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3920–3928.
7. Matsumoto, M.; Watanabe, N.; Kasuga, N. C.;
Hamada, F.; Tadokoro, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
2863–2866.
8. Matsumoto, M.; Ishihara, T.; Watanabe, N.; Hiroshima,
T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4571–4574.
9. There have been several reports on bicyclic dioxetanes,
2,7,8-trioxabicyclo[4.2.0]octanes, though all of them are
rather unstable thermally.10–12
10. Jefford, C. W.; Wang, Y.; Bernardinelli, G. Helv. Chim.
Acta 1988, 71, 2042–2052.
11. Chan, Y.-Y.; Li, X.; Zhu, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Leung,
H.-K. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5497–5504.
12. Gollnick, K.; Knutzen-Mies, K. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
4017–4027.
Two mechanisms have been proposed for the
intramolecular CIEEL. The first mechanism (ET-BET
mechanism) comprises an initial electron transfer caus-
ing decomposition of dioxetane to form a radical ion
pair of two carbonyl fragments as the first elementary
step and successive annihilation of the radical ion pair
by electron back transfer (BET) to give an excited
carbonyl as the secondary step (1213BET10 or
15 in Scheme 3).22,23,26–28 According to the ET-BET
mechanism, the radical ion pair produced from 2
should possess a structure(s) to cause BET more effec-
tively than that from 1, since the BET step should affect
decisively the yield of a carbonyl at the singlet-excited
state as suggested by Adam.28 The second is a mecha-
nism in which an intermediate produced by charge-
transfer-induced OꢀO bond cleavage gives an excited
carbonyl directly and not through the distinct forma-
tion of a radical ion pair (14direct10 or 15 in
Scheme 3).29,30 The second mechanism for the
intramolecular CIEEL resembles the thermal chemiex-
citation mechanism especially in the CꢀC bond cleavage
at the second step, and appears to be in agreement with
ab initio molecular orbital studies.31 Although the
present results do not give definitive information either
to rationalize the mechanism of charge-transfer induced
chemiluminescent decomposition of dioxetane or to
answer the above question, they clarify that the struc-
ture of dioxetane not participating formally in chemiex-
citation affects the yield of excited carbonyls, and
provides a clue to study the relation between thermal
chemiexcitation and CIEEL.
13. The CIEEL has been originally proposed by Schuster
for intermolecular system including initial electron-trans-
fer from an electron donor to a peroxide, giving a radi-
cal ion pair, annihilation of which by electron back
transfer affords a singlet excited species.14
14. Schuster, G. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 366–373.
15. Selected spectral data for 2a: 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) lH 0.18 (s, 6H), 0.98 (s, 9H), 0.99 (s, 9H), 1.16
(s, 3H), 1.40 (ddd, J=13.2, 9.3 and 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.58 (s,
3H), 3.00 (dt, J=13.2 and 9.3 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (dt, J=10.7
and 9.3 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (ddd, J=10.7, 9.3, and 2.4 Hz,
1H), 6.80 (d with fine coupling, J=8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.88–
7.20 (broad m, 2H), 7.21 (t, J=8.3 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) lC −4.3, 18.2, 25.6, 25.7, 28.6, 29.4,
37.1, 38.4, 39.4, 59.7, 100.6, 109.9, 118.4, 119.4, 120.0,
128.8, 142.1, 155.3. Mass (m/z, %) 406 (M+, trace), 349
(12), 321 (4), 305 (4), 279 (5), 253 (15), 235 (100).
HRMS 406.2552, calcd for C23H38O4Si 406.2539.
16. Thermal decomposition of 3,3-dibenzyl-1,2-dioxetane
has been reported to give Norrish type I product, 1,2-
diphenylethane, in 2.2% yield.17
Acknowledgements
The authors express their appreciation to Professors J.
Tanaka and M. Ohashi, and Dr. C. Tanaka of Kana-
gawa University for many helpful discussions. The
authors gratefully acknowledge financial assistance pro-
vided by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research by the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.
17. Richardson, W. H.; Montgomery, F. C.; Yelvington, M.
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 9277–9278.
18. Yang, N. C.; Feit, E. D.; Hui, M. H.; Turro, N. J.;
Dalton, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 6974–6976.
19. Alkyl esters of 3-(tert-butyldimethylsiloxy)benzoic acid
emitted fluorescence at umax=328–330 nm (in
acetonitrile).
References
20. Enhanced luminescence with 9,10-diphenylanthracene
was observed for thermolysis of 2a and singlet-chemiex-
citation yield was estimated to be F=0.011. On the
other hand, an attempt to estimate the chemienergized
triplet state(s) by the use of 9,10-dibromoanthracene
(DBA: rate constant for triplet-singlet energy transfer=
1. Lechtken, P.; Reissenweber, G.; Grubmuller, P. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1977, 2881–2884.
2. Baumstark, A. L.; Wilson, C. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979,
2569–2570.
3. Baumstark, A. L.; Wilson, C. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981,
22, 4363–4364.
4. Such stability trends have been rationalized in terms of
the degree of puckering of the dioxetane ring, caused by
conformational effects of the annelated rings. It was
argued that six-membered ring annelation compels the
most puckered dioxetane ring and hence lowest stability,
while five- and/or seven-membered ring annelation
1×109 M−1 s−1 21
was unsuccessful. This result may be
)
consistent since the type I reaction of the triplet-excited
highly-branched-alkyl ketone moiety of 5 occurs pre-
sumably as rapidly as that of di-tert-butyl ketone (k=7–
9×109 sec−1).18
21. Turro, N. J.; Lechtken, P.; Schuster, G.; Orell, J.; Stein-
metzer, H.-C.; Adam, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
1627–1629.
obliges
a planar dioxetane ring and hence highest
stability.5,6