ions such as Hg2+, Pb2+, and Cu2+.3 However, relatively few
examples of fluorescent sensors for Cd2+ have been reported,4
and though more research has developed rapidly in recent
years.5 It is well-known that cadmium is one of the important
resources and is currently used in many processes such as
electroplating, metallurgy, war industry, agriculture, etc.6
These sources lead to cadmium exposure through various
means, and there is evidence of increasing cadmium ac-
cumulation in food and organisms, which will pose severe
harm for human health.7 On the other hand, Cd2+ and some
metal ions, especially Zn2+, have many similar properties,
thus it is difficult to discriminate between them.4,5,8 There-
fore, there is a great need for the design and synthesis of
such chemosensors, which have high sensitivity and selectiv-
ity for detecting and monitoring Cd2+ by employing a simple
response at physiological pH.
ions.11 To take advantage of the 1,3,4-oxadiazole subunit
containing lone electron pairs on N, the semirigid ligand
could effectively chelate Cd2+ according to the ionic radius
and limit the geometric structure of the complex.
The synthesis of 1 is described in Scheme 1. Compound
2 was first prepared according to the literature.12 Compound
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Chemosensor 1
Based on our previous research on the recognition and
separation of important metal ions,9 it is necessary to choose
an efficient fluorophore and consider the geometry of
coordination sites for a certain cation. Herein, we describe
a new and simple fluorescent Cd2+ sensor 1 based on the
chelation-enhanced fluorescence (CHEF) mechanism. CHEF
is an attractive design principle for developing luminescent
chemical devices, which combine the ability to recognize
and respond to an external input mostly with mediation of
photoinduced electron transfer (PET).10 An important part
within this application is to obtain a suitable semirigid
structure. Upon complexation with a certain metal ion, a large
CHEF effect is observed because the stable chelation
abrogates the PET process from the electron-donating group
to the fluorophore (“turn-on state”). In sensor 1, we chose
the 8-hydroxyquinoline derivative as the fluorophore due to
its good photostability and strong ability to complex metal
1 was then synthesized as a pale brown solid via a simple
one-step reaction of 2 with 2 equiv of 8-hydroxyquinoline
in good yield using anhydrous potassium carbonate in
refluxing acetone (91%).
Sensor 1 should have weak fluorescence on the basis of
the consideration that the N lone electron pairs in the 1,3,4-
oxadiazole are brought into immediate proximity to the
8-hydroxyquinoline fluorophores, as a result of a radiationless
process via the nπ* state. This interpretation is supported
by the fact that 1 in the aprotic solvent acetonitrile exhibits
weaker fluorescence, with quantum yield (Φ) ca. 0.01 (Table
S1, Supporting Information), which obviously differs from
those highly fluorescent ether derivatives, for example, Φ
) 0.5 for 8-(benzyloxy)quinoline.11 Further, in the protic
solvent MeOH and mixed solvent 5% H2O-MeOH, Φ of 1
are 1.24 times and 3.09 times greater than that in acetonitrile,
respectively, due to the hydrogen bonding of the solvent to
the N lone electron pairs. It weakens the intramolecular
radiationless transitions from the nπ* state and makes the
emission maximum (λem) undergo a gradual red shift with
increasing protonation by the solvent. Therefore, 1 appears
to be a promising candidate for enhancing fluorescence
emission upon binding suitable metal ions if their radiation-
less channel could be well blocked.
Fluorescent sensors based on electron donor/acceptor are
usually disturbed by protons in the detection of metal ions,
so it is necessary to consider excluding the pH effect and
finding optimal sensing conditions. The response of 1 toward
pH was investigated in 5% H2O-MeOH mixed solvent in
search of the “turn-off state” (Figure S1, Supporting Infor-
mation). The emission peak of 1 is observed at ca. 397 nm
at neutral pH, and no dramatic change is expected under
alkaline conditions. However, under acidic conditions,
increasing the acid concentration leads to a gradual decrease
(4) (a) Bronson, R. T.; Michaelis, D. J.; Lamb, R. D.; Husseini, G. A.;
Farnsworth, P. B.; Linford, M. R.; Izatt, R. M.; Bradshaw, J. S.; Savage,
P. B. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1105. (b) Gunnlaugsson, T.; Lee, T. C.; Parkesh,
R. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 11239. (c) Gunnlaugsson, T.; Lee, T. C.; Parke,
R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4065. (d) Costero, A. M.; Andreu, R.; Monrabal, E.;
Martinez-Manez, R.; Sancenon, F.; Soto, J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
2002, 1769. (e) Choi, M.; Kim, M.; Lee, K. D.; Han, K. N.; Yoon, I. A.;
Chung, H. J.; Yoon, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3455.
(5) (a) Yunus, S.; Charles, S.; Dubois, F.; Vander Donckt, E. J. Fluoresc.
2008, 18, 499. (b) Lee, H. N.; Kim, H. N.; Swamy, K. M. K.; Park, M. S.;
Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, K.-H.; Park, S.; Yoon, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008,
49, 1261. (c) Liu, W.; Xu, L.; Sheng, R.; Wang, P.; Li, H.; Wu, S. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 3829. (d) Peng, X.; Du, J.; Fan, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhao,
J.; Sun, S.; Xu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1500. (e) Lu, C.; Xu, Z.;
Cui, J.; Zhang, R.; Qian, X. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3554. (f) Aragoni,
M. C.; Arca, M.; Bencini, A.; Blake, A. J.; Caltagirone, C.; Danesi, A.;
Devillanova, F. A.; Garau, A.; Gelbrich, T.; Isaia, F.; Lippolis, V.;
Hursthouse, M. B.; Valtancoli, B.; Wilson, C. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 8088.
(g) Luo, H.-Y.; Jiang, J.-H.; Zhang, X.-B.; Li, C.-Y.; Shen, G.-L.; Yu, R.-
Q. Talanta 2007, 72, 575.
(6) Chaney, R. L.; Ryan, J. A.; Li, Y.-M.; Brown, S. L. In Cadmium in
Soils and Plants; McLaughlin, M. J., Singh, B. R., Eds.; Kluwer: Boston,
1999; pp 219-256.
(7) (a) Dobson, S. Cadmium: Environmental Aspects; World Health
Organization: Geneva, 1992. (b) Friberg, L.; Elinger, C. G.; Kjellstro¨m, T.
Cadmium;World Health Organization: Geneva, 1992.
(8) (a) Cotton, F. A.; Wilkinson, G. AdVances in Inorganic Chemistry,
5th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1988; pp 957-1358. (b) Dakternieks, D. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 1990, 98, 279–294
.
(9) (a) Mao, J.; Wang, L.; Dou, W.; Tang, X.; Yan, Y.; Liu, W. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 4567. (b) Dang, F.; Liu, W.; Zheng, J. J. Fluoresc. 2007, 17,
89.
(11) (a) Song, K. C.; Kim, J. S.; Park, S. M.; Chung, K.-C.; Ahn, S.;
Chang, S.-K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3413. (b) Zhang, H.; Han, L.; Zachariasse,
K. A.; Jiang, Y. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4217.
(10) Chattopadhyay, N.; Mallick, A.; Sengupta, S. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. A 2006, 177, 55.
(12) Zhang, R.; Jordan, R.; Nuyken, O. Macromol. Rapid Commun.
2003, 24, 246.
3654
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 17, 2008