1746
Helvetica Chimica Acta – Vol. 92 (2009)
Experimental Part
1. Norbixin (3). Bixin (2) was hydrolyzed by modifying a previous procedure [23]. Thus, 2 (0.1 g,
0.2535 mmol) was dissolved in 25% KOH/MeOH (0.25 ml), and BuOH (5 ml) was added. The soln. was
heated to 1108 under N2 for 7 h (TLC monitoring (silica gel sheets, acetone/hexane 1.5 :1)). After solvent
evaporation, H2SO4 (1.25 ml, 25%) was added and the soln. stirred for 5 min. Then, H2O (5 ml) was
added, and the mixture stirred for 30 min at r.t. CH2Cl2 (5 ml) was added, and the org. phase washed
several times with H2O until neutrality and then concentrated. The product was dissolved in acetone and
dried (Na2SO4). TLC and subsequent VIS-spectra analysis showed the occurrence of a cis-isomer (cis-
peak at 350 nm). The isomers were dissolved in MeOH and several drops of a I2/MeOH soln. were added,
which catalyzed cis to trans isomerization. After freeze-drying, 3 (29 mg, 30%) was obtained. VIS: Fig. 1.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): 7.85 (d, HC¼CHCOOH); 7.3 – 6.2 (m, CH of the polyene); 6.1 – 5.8 (m,
CH¼CHꢁCOOH); 2.1 – 1.9 (4 Me) [7]; no signals for the cis-isomer and for MeO of bixin (2). ESI-MS:
403 ([380 þ Na]þ) [17].
2. Norbixin Dipotassium Salt (¼(2E,4E,6E,8E,10E,12E,14E,16E,18E)-4,8,13,17-Tetramethyleicosa-
2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18-nonaenedioic Acid Potassium Salt (1:2); 5). Norbixin (3; 40.5 mg, 0.1064 mmol)
was dissolved in CH2Cl2/MeOH 1:0.6 (60 ml) at 08, and the same mol amount of 25% MeOK/MeOH
(63 ml, 0.2134 mmol) for each COOH group was added. The solvents were evaporated without heating.
VIS: Fig. 2.
3. Aggregation. Aggregate behavior was monitored by dispersing a known amount of 3 with H2O in a
UV cell. Several ml of MeOH were added prior to adding H2O to assure full dispersion. MeOH quantities
(150 ml) were continuously added, and the spectra recorded until the aggregates were disrupted forming a
monomolecular soln. Similarly, to a specified amount of 3 dissolved in MeOH, H2O (150 ml) was
gradually added until the aggregation peak was observed. Both measurements gave similar results
(Fig. 1).
4. Dispersibility. Dispersibility of 3 and 5 was determined spectroscopically in H2O (Milli-Q).
5. Particle Size. Aggregate size was determined with a N5 submicron-particle-size analyzer (by PCS;
Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton) at angles presenting reliable values after filtering the dispersion with a
200-nm filter.
6. Surface Parameters. Critical aggregate concentration and surface tension were determined in a
conical, Teflon-coated vessel with a Wilhelmy plate on a Krꢀss-K100 tensiometer by gradually adding
H2O to an aq. dispersion of 5 with a Metrohm-765 dosimat. The g value was taken 25 min after each
dilution (Fig. 3). The measurements were made in duplicate at different times by different operators. For
the calculation of thermodynamic data, see [4].
REFERENCES
[1] H. D. Preston, M. D. Rickard, Food Chem. 1980, 5, 47.
[2] A. Satyanarayana, P. G. P. Rao, D. G. Rao, J. Food Sci. Tech. (Mysore) 2003, 40, 131.
[3] D. R. Tennant, M. OꢁCallaghan, Food Res. Int. 2005, 38, 911.
[4] S. N. Naess, A. Elgsaeter, B. J. Foss, B. J. Li, H. R. Sliwka, V. Partali, T. B. Melo, K. R. Naqvi, Helv.
Chim. Acta 2006, 89, 45.
[6] D. Ouyang, R. Zhang, L. Yi, Z. Xi, Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2802.
[7] V. Galindo-Cuspinera, S. A. Rankin, J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2524.
[8] G. S. Silva, A. G. Souza, J. R. Botelho, M. C. D. Silva, T. M. S. Silva, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2007,
87, 871.
[9] J. L. Gainer, University of Virginia, US, WO 98/14183, 1998.
[10] G. F. Silva, F. M. C. Gamarra, A. L. Oliveira, F. A. Cabral, Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 25, 419.
[11] G. Speranza, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B: Biol. 1990, 8, 51.
[12] K. Kovary, T. S. Louvain, M. C. C. E. Silva, F. Albano, B. B. M. Pires, G. A. T. Laranja, C. L. S. Lage,
I. Felzenszwalb, Br. J. Nutr. 2001, 85, 431.
[13] S. Kiokias, M. H. Gordon, Food Chem. 2003, 83, 523.